ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Managed Futures: An Alternative Investment Strategy

Updated on August 6, 2013

Managed Futures

The core principles of applying investing to a sound financial plan have for more than a half of a century revolved around the work of Harry Markowitz, and the foundation he outlined for Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT). Yet, in recent decades we have seen that as the world has become more greatly interconnected at an economic level, portfolio correlations have also increased. This is particularly true in period of great economic stress. This has led to somewhat of an over dependence on MPT in financial planning. The increase in correlations has created greater demand for more alternative asset classes to help lower correlations and reduce portfolio volatility. Yet, this is easier said than done. Many asset classes defined as “alternatives” do not necessarily offer the lower correlations during the most stressful periods.

One of the areas that for some time has served as a potential hedge against portfolio volatility is the futures market. The futures market allows investors to take long and short positions in futures contracts on various assets including…equity, commodity, fixed income, and currency holdings. Futures are similar to options contracts, but not identical. As one such example, in the futures market both parties to the contract must actually deliver the underlying asset on delivery date. In the options market this is not necessarily the case. This can be problematic for the average investor to engage in, as most investors are not capable of, nor do they wish to deliver a crop of wheat on delivery date.

The futures market does allow for professional management through what is known as a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA). CTA’s are regulated by Commodity Futures Trading Association (CFTC). CTA’s can manage money for individuals, or other professional money managers who do not offer such expertise, but wish to hedge their client portfolios. More recently they have been utilized through mutual funds for the average investor wishing to participate in the managed futures market.

The single biggest benefit associated with managed futures is the lowest demonstrated correlation to the broad equity markets during periods of extreme stress, such as the swift market decline of 2008. According to Callan Associates, the managed futures market posted a positive 13.60% return in 2008, compared to a -37% on the S&P 500 index.

Similar to other alternative asset classes such as Long/Short equity funds, Managed Futures have the ability to take positions across the marketplace which can be bullish, bearish or neutral. Yet because of the time value involved in the underlying contracts, Managed Futures tend to do best in periods where more clearly identifiable trends can be found. Trends in the futures market can exist over a period of years, months or even intraday. Typically a CTA has an expertise in a specific type of asset and a specific trading strategy. Yet in recent years since the 2008 crisis, there has been a great deal of government intervention in the marketplace, particularly by the Federal Reserve Bank. This intervention inevitably has the effect of distorting markets and making it much harder to identify trends. Not surprisingly, this has resulted in returns that are substantially lower than the broad markets since the 2008/2009 crisis. Yet, if one believes that the central bank will begin to limit its involvement in the marketplace, this may create more opportunity in the Managed Futures marketplace.

While Managed Futures have demonstrated a low correlation to the broad market, that does not mean they are not volatile. Due to the inherent potential for volatility of such an asset class, it’s important to look for an experienced CTA. Searching for a CTA may not be easy. There are many, just as there are many mutual funds which focus on different strategies. As a method to minimize risk, we tend to look for a multi manager approach that applies various strategies. In doing so we believe this has the ability to further reduce extreme mistakes to the downside, yet also reduces the possibility of hitting the proverbial investment “homerun”. However, hitting “homeruns” should not be the ultimate objective of utilizing such a strategy. It should be to reduce volatility, without sacrificing significant long term investment returns. That should be the overall general objective of utilizing any form of alternative asset classes.

One negative to utilizing such a strategy is that expenses are high, whether you employ a CTA directly or utilize a mutual fund as a resource. Expenses in general tend to be higher in all forms of alternative assets. Ultimately, due to both expenses and the negative correlation...this strategy should be applied in relatively small proportion to the average investors account. However, when you apply a Managed Futures approach along with other alternative asset classes as a method to supplement a traditional MPT asset allocation, the data suggests you greatly increase the chances that your overall portfolio volatility will decline markedly, without sacrificing a substantial amount of portfolio performance.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.