- Politics and Social Issues»
- Politics & Political Science
Freedom Means Avoiding Taxes and Letting the Poor Starve
If corporations can make money in the United State’s market, use our infrastructure including the Internet and wireless grid, roads, highways, rails, ports, power grid, sewage, military and police and not pay taxes by moving their money overseas, then Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin should be allowed to do the same. His success in using U.S. markets and infrastructure to make billions and then avoid taxes is an example to us all.
Heidi Harris, host of Heidi Harris in the Morning, has come to the defense of hero Eduardo Saverin. He spent fourteen years as a U.S. citizen, made billions on Facebook, and then renounced the U.S. to avoid taxes before the Facebook IPO would make him billions more. Singapore will welcome his cash with open arms and he won’t have to pay income taxes.
As Heidi Harris said in his defense on Reverend Sharpton’s show Politics Nation, “Taking welfare and food stamps they are dead weight…you don’t need food stamps to buy Doritos.” She brought up food stamps when defending Saverin because we shouldn’t punish him for making money. We should punish the hungry food stamp recipients for not avoiding paying sales tax on those Doritos. Makes sense to me.
Ms. Harris zinged that liberal! Yes, you don’t need food stamps to buy Doritos, and you know, that’s what people on food stamps and welfare eat, Doritos.
While there are more Whites in America that receive food stamps, it’s only the Latino and Black recipients that bother Republicans because the Whites who receive food stamps still vote republican. As long as you’re going after some of the Republican base as well, liberals can’t call you hypocritical, Ms. Harris. They can just call you inhumane, self-righteous, ignorant and a tool, but you won’t be hypocritical, thank God!
Like Ms. Harris, I too am disgusted by people who use food stamps to eat rather than starve. If only we gave them all guns, they could shoot themselves and stop being such a bother to the job creators. And Harris is correct, because she has used the vast network of spy cameras operating through all the cable networks (they all have cable) to spy on food stamp recipients and she knows they are dead weight, or will be dead weight when we give them a one time food stamp payment of a gun with enough bullets to kill themselves and every worthless member of their family. Let’s literally make them dead weight and create a few jobs for morticians. They should %$#^ off and die and stop bothering us. They are, after all, animals.
Mary Franson, state Representative of Minnesota, tells it like it is when she describes food stamp recipients as animals who will just breed if we give them food. Don’t feed the animals, she says.
The Park Service is NOT part of the Department of Agriculture; it’s part of the Department of the Interior. But why quibble with greatness? Her logic is impeccable. Rudolph Hess would agree with Rep. Franson, and we know how logical those Germans can be.
South Carolina Lt. Governor Andre Bauer, who hopes to succeed fellow Republican Mark Sanford as his state's governor, drew a comparison between government help for poor people and "feeding stray animals" who "breed" like...animals.
"My grandmother was not a highly educated woman, but she told me as a small child to quit feeding stray animals," Bauer said during a town hall meeting, as the Greenville News reported over the weekend. You know why? Because they breed. You're facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person ample food supply. They will reproduce, especially ones that don't think too much further than that. And so what you've got to do is you've got to curtail that type of behavior. They don't know any better."
Yes, many of those people that “breed” and “don’t know any better” vote Republican. I am just so thankful that Republicans are against job's programs that might employ people and reduce the food stamp problem. We need forced sterilization for these animals. Perhaps we can get the SPCA on it.
Getting rid of food stamps has benefits other than making the U.S. solvent. It will protect the sanctity of marriage because more women will stay in their marriages, no matter how abusive their husbands are. And if poor women get killed in these abusive marriages, that’s just one less mouth to feed. Getting rid of food stamps will reduce the price of prostitutes for the 1% businessmen on the go by increasing the supply of available women. It will also increase child labor using the work or starve model of labor so successful in the third world. And those child laborers won’t waste education resources in the class room. Those seats are reserved for deserving children who will not be dead weight. These are just a few of the benefits Harris, Franson, Bauer and other conservatives see in ending the food stamp program. It really is the best course of action.
Crazy liberals will say that billionaires need to pay taxes for the benefits they get and this will fund such programs as food stamps. As we have seen, we don’t even need the food stamp program. Billionaires have the right to use millions of dollars of infrastructure and make billions off the U.S. markets. It’s the food stamp recipients that are ruining us!
And please, let’s not discuss the inequity of our economic system that makes it hard for people to feed themselves. Let’s keep blaming the poor.