About the Democratic Party & the Liberal Mindset
In breaking about the facts about the democratic party it is easy to see that they are following the British Labour Party, in that they use rhetoric that is appealing to the working class to secure votes and then turn around and hurt those who voted them in. The democratic party is highly damaging to the middle class and the foreigners who want to get ahead and live the American dream. The party preys on peoples insecurity and does what it can to further weaken the working class into believing that they NEED to have the government take care of them because they can not do it themselves.
This country was made up of independent minded people who in effort to escape the stifling taxes of Europe, came to a new land so that they could work hard, build a better life and prosper without the government interfering. Unfortunately, the average American is not educated well enough in the subject of History to understand why Europeans were so motivated to leave their mother country in effort to find freedom. The Republican party is quite different in that they want the freedom to keep their own money and prosper. This makes everyone happy in the overall picture of things because it also encourages people to be more charitable and it reduces the crime rate.
With the bombardment of liberal propaganda being served up daily through television, and the liberal press, the average person who has no real knowledge of what drives an economy, and what truly benefits the middle class, is so brainwashed by the noise that they can come up with a list of lies as to why its bad to be a free Republican and why its better to be a democrat, and be dependent on the government for help.
Christians and Muslims
Liberals are on an anti Christian rampage at the present, claiming that the Christian religion is damaging to women. The ultimate hypocrisy is that they are pro Muslim. The wildcats on The View walked out off the stage in a childish huff when their guest, Bill O'Reilly honestly stated that if he were in an airport and about to board a plane with a bunch of Muslims it would make him a little nervous. The democrats don't want anyone to fear any Muslims and are doing all they can to make the Muslims a special and protected group. If they care so much about women then why are they coddling a religion that forces women to wear rags and if they try to branch out of the religion their husband dowses them with acid? Sounds very hypocritical to me.
I attended a democratic convention to see the women wrinkle their noses and say, "oh that person is a Christian" with the utmost disdain, and when a one of their old friends who they hadn't seen is sometime was now Muslim they all gushed. This is not one isolated incident, it is like a cult. Liberals all know that they should hate Christians and ridicule their desire to worship and live a good clean life, and they show the utmost respect for Muslims who want to build a Mosque on the site of where the 9/11 tragedy took place.
If these Muslims were such good people who don't want any combat then why don't they, out of respect for the families of 9/11 build their Mosque elsewhere? This question never reaches the liberal mind, only the mindset that if you think that Muslims should show respect to the families and go elsewhere that you must be prejudice. I would think that the victims of the tragedy be put before the Muslims and their wants. If they are a religion of peace then they would back down and to the kind, respectful and human thing.
Hilary Clinton Attempts to Prove She is Open to Muslims
CNN, MSNBC & The View; Do People Really Think Its Straight News?
I am sure to get a ton of flack for this hub. But I think its worth ruffling a few feathers to point out a few facts and hope it makes some people think a little bit beyond MSNBC, NBC, The (Narrow) View, and the typical slanted mainstream media dose of daily brainwashing.
What brought me to write this article was that I was talking to a woman I have not seen in a few years, and we began talking about marriages, people, and general things about life.
In speaking of long term marriages and couples going through tough times together, I mentioned Mitt Romney and his wife. My friend smirked and I knew what was coming. "Don't you think that their relationship is just for publicity and that he does not really respect her?"
I asked her why she would say that, and got a bunch of junk about Mormon's and how much they disrespect women, and turn them into "stepford wives." This is coming from a woman who was so enthralled by the Obama's, their sweet inauguration dance, and what a great relationship they have because the press releases information about their "dates."
I waited until she finished blasting Mitt Romney for being a sexist Republican, combined with being a sexist Mormon, and how much of a disgrace he would be to women of America, before I countered with something Democrats hate hearing. You guessed it, FACTS!
Obama is connected to the most horrid and anti- female religion on earth. Muslims are against women being people, period! But that little piece of reality is somehow overlooked by the feminists who voted for Obama. This alone is enough for me to lose respect for the whole feminist movement. They actually make excuses for the Muslims by saying that women are starting to be allowed to get some education now. Give me a break! "Starting?" Is that supposed to be impressive? We went from, "you've come a long way baby," to starting from square one. Even women in the 1920's were "allowed" to be educated and vote!
Which reminds me of the day I cast my vote for John McCain in San Diego California and witnessed a group of women wearing sheets and voting for the first time, with their men telling them what to do, and how to vote on everything. A sickening sight on its own, but to see the oblivious attitudes on the "caring" and "non-sexist" Democrats who were talking about nothing more than how dumb Sarah Palin is.
Let's review some facts again. Sarah Palin had been a Governor and a Mayor when she was running for Vice President. That alone makes her more qualified than Obama, the community organizer, who was running for President. Palin is what every woman would love to be, and that is precisely why the left went after her so intensely. Their mission was to blindside the public before they had a chance to see what was right in front of them. Palin is a beautiful, intelligent, charismatic, and well educated, Conservative woman, who is married to a handsome and doting husband. If feminists could see straight, they would have been very impressed with this lady who really has it all.
What do the Democrats have to impress the feminists with? Hilary Clinton. Not exactly a charismatic beautiful woman to start with, and then when one has to remember that she is married to a lying and cheating Bill Clinton. Who is the stepford wife now? I asked a group of liberals to ponder this one, "would you rather be Sarah Palin or Hilary Clinton?" I asked them to ponder it, not answer it, because I knew it would be too much for them to admit. No one wants to be married to a man like Bill Clinton. So, I know the answer to that one.
Just try to imagine what would happen if Palin were married to a man like Clinton. There is no way that MSNBC would leave her alone for a minute. Whenever a Democrat does anything bad, they have their peanut gallery chanting, "everyone does it, and therefore its okay".
They Democratic party really has their public trained to back up whatever another Democrat does, and to ridicule whatever Republicans do. It seems as though there is no real attempt to think independently.
As a Conservative, I can look at Republicans and say that I do not agree with a particular candidate, and think that was he did was wrong, and I don't believe that person should continue to run, ect. I will not jump to a person's side just because they belong to my party, and I have found that to be true with other conservatives.
It is quite predictable as to what my Democrat friends are going to talk about after I see a clip of something on NBC ( I see a little of this "news" because when I visit my mother, she turns it on) about Sarah Palin's clothes and how terrible Ann Romney is for wearing an $800 blouse. I pay enough attention to what the social- liberal news is saying to make my little comebacks that leave the liberals dumbfounded and disinterested in talking to me any further.
During lunch my liberal friends look at each other slyly, ready to getting ready to hit me with something scandalous, "Did you know that Ann Romney was wearing a $800 blouse?" I replied yes, that seems rather cheap compared with Michelle Obama's $900 sneakers, and $2500 purse, doesn't it.?" The blank stares were telling me that they never even gave a thought that Michelle Obama shops anywhere other than Walmart. If MSNBC, CNN, or NBC does not deliver the information, it does not exist. Of course I rub it in further with, "the media failed to mention that Sarah Palin donated all the expensive clothes she wore during the campaign to charity and we are paying for Michelle Obama's wardrobe." Confused liberals ready to change the subject....
For some reason, (like I don't know), MSNBC has not presented it and the liberals don't realize that Obama is rich too. So much attention is being driven to convincing the public that Mitt Romney is too successful to tolerate that the liberals have forgotten that Obama's wealth was celebrated while he was running against McCain. Yes, Chris Matthews called McCain a loser for not being as rich as Obama.
If the Democrats really care about "little people", and hate the fact that politicians are rich, then why didn't they rebel three years ago against some of the biggest campaign money ever?
Oh, that's right, MSNBC did not tell them to.