ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

About the Democratic Party & the Liberal Mindset

Updated on March 18, 2013

The Democrats

In breaking about the facts about the democratic party it is easy to see that they are following the British Labour Party, in that they use rhetoric that is appealing to the working class to secure votes and then turn around and hurt those who voted them in. The democratic party is highly damaging to the middle class and the foreigners who want to get ahead and live the American dream. The party preys on peoples insecurity and does what it can to further weaken the working class into believing that they NEED to have the government take care of them because they can not do it themselves.

This country was made up of independent minded people who in effort to escape the stifling taxes of Europe, came to a new land so that they could work hard, build a better life and prosper without the government interfering. Unfortunately, the average American is not educated well enough in the subject of History to understand why Europeans were so motivated to leave their mother country in effort to find freedom. The Republican party is quite different in that they want the freedom to keep their own money and prosper. This makes everyone happy in the overall picture of things because it also encourages people to be more charitable and it reduces the crime rate.

With the bombardment of liberal propaganda being served up daily through television, and the liberal press, the average person who has no real knowledge of what drives an economy, and what truly benefits the middle class, is so brainwashed by the noise that they can come up with a list of lies as to why its bad to be a free Republican and why its better to be a democrat, and be dependent on the government for help.

Christians and Muslims

Liberals are on an anti Christian rampage at the present, claiming that the Christian religion is damaging to women. The ultimate hypocrisy is that they are pro Muslim. The wildcats on The View walked out off the stage in a childish huff when their guest, Bill O'Reilly honestly stated that if he were in an airport and about to board a plane with a bunch of Muslims it would make him a little nervous. The democrats don't want anyone to fear any Muslims and are doing all they can to make the Muslims a special and protected group. If they care so much about women then why are they coddling a religion that forces women to wear rags and if they try to branch out of the religion their husband dowses them with acid? Sounds very hypocritical to me.

I attended a democratic convention to see the women wrinkle their noses and say, "oh that person is a Christian" with the utmost disdain, and when a one of their old friends who they hadn't seen is sometime was now Muslim they all gushed. This is not one isolated incident, it is like a cult. Liberals all know that they should hate Christians and ridicule their desire to worship and live a good clean life, and they show the utmost respect for Muslims who want to build a Mosque on the site of where the 9/11 tragedy took place.

If these Muslims were such good people who don't want any combat then why don't they, out of respect for the families of 9/11 build their Mosque elsewhere? This question never reaches the liberal mind, only the mindset that if you think that Muslims should show respect to the families and go elsewhere that you must be prejudice. I would think that the victims of the tragedy be put before the Muslims and their wants. If they are a religion of peace then they would back down and to the kind, respectful and human thing.

Hilary Clinton Attempts to Prove She is Open to Muslims

CNN, MSNBC & The View; Do People Really Think Its Straight News?

I am sure to get a ton of flack for this hub. But I think its worth ruffling a few feathers to point out a few facts and hope it makes some people think a little bit beyond MSNBC, NBC, The (Narrow) View, and the typical slanted mainstream media dose of daily brainwashing.

What brought me to write this article was that I was talking to a woman I have not seen in a few years, and we began talking about marriages, people, and general things about life.

In speaking of long term marriages and couples going through tough times together, I mentioned Mitt Romney and his wife. My friend smirked and I knew what was coming. "Don't you think that their relationship is just for publicity and that he does not really respect her?"

I asked her why she would say that, and got a bunch of junk about Mormon's and how much they disrespect women, and turn them into "stepford wives." This is coming from a woman who was so enthralled by the Obama's, their sweet inauguration dance, and what a great relationship they have because the press releases information about their "dates."

I waited until she finished blasting Mitt Romney for being a sexist Republican, combined with being a sexist Mormon, and how much of a disgrace he would be to women of America, before I countered with something Democrats hate hearing. You guessed it, FACTS!

Obama is connected to the most horrid and anti- female religion on earth. Muslims are against women being people, period! But that little piece of reality is somehow overlooked by the feminists who voted for Obama. This alone is enough for me to lose respect for the whole feminist movement. They actually make excuses for the Muslims by saying that women are starting to be allowed to get some education now. Give me a break! "Starting?" Is that supposed to be impressive? We went from, "you've come a long way baby," to starting from square one. Even women in the 1920's were "allowed" to be educated and vote!

Which reminds me of the day I cast my vote for John McCain in San Diego California and witnessed a group of women wearing sheets and voting for the first time, with their men telling them what to do, and how to vote on everything. A sickening sight on its own, but to see the oblivious attitudes on the "caring" and "non-sexist" Democrats who were talking about nothing more than how dumb Sarah Palin is.

Let's review some facts again. Sarah Palin had been a Governor and a Mayor when she was running for Vice President. That alone makes her more qualified than Obama, the community organizer, who was running for President. Palin is what every woman would love to be, and that is precisely why the left went after her so intensely. Their mission was to blindside the public before they had a chance to see what was right in front of them. Palin is a beautiful, intelligent, charismatic, and well educated, Conservative woman, who is married to a handsome and doting husband. If feminists could see straight, they would have been very impressed with this lady who really has it all.

What do the Democrats have to impress the feminists with? Hilary Clinton. Not exactly a charismatic beautiful woman to start with, and then when one has to remember that she is married to a lying and cheating Bill Clinton. Who is the stepford wife now? I asked a group of liberals to ponder this one, "would you rather be Sarah Palin or Hilary Clinton?" I asked them to ponder it, not answer it, because I knew it would be too much for them to admit. No one wants to be married to a man like Bill Clinton. So, I know the answer to that one.

Just try to imagine what would happen if Palin were married to a man like Clinton. There is no way that MSNBC would leave her alone for a minute. Whenever a Democrat does anything bad, they have their peanut gallery chanting, "everyone does it, and therefore its okay".

They Democratic party really has their public trained to back up whatever another Democrat does, and to ridicule whatever Republicans do. It seems as though there is no real attempt to think independently.

As a Conservative, I can look at Republicans and say that I do not agree with a particular candidate, and think that was he did was wrong, and I don't believe that person should continue to run, ect. I will not jump to a person's side just because they belong to my party, and I have found that to be true with other conservatives.

It is quite predictable as to what my Democrat friends are going to talk about after I see a clip of something on NBC ( I see a little of this "news" because when I visit my mother, she turns it on) about Sarah Palin's clothes and how terrible Ann Romney is for wearing an $800 blouse. I pay enough attention to what the social- liberal news is saying to make my little comebacks that leave the liberals dumbfounded and disinterested in talking to me any further.

During lunch my liberal friends look at each other slyly, ready to getting ready to hit me with something scandalous, "Did you know that Ann Romney was wearing a $800 blouse?" I replied yes, that seems rather cheap compared with Michelle Obama's $900 sneakers, and $2500 purse, doesn't it.?" The blank stares were telling me that they never even gave a thought that Michelle Obama shops anywhere other than Walmart. If MSNBC, CNN, or NBC does not deliver the information, it does not exist. Of course I rub it in further with, "the media failed to mention that Sarah Palin donated all the expensive clothes she wore during the campaign to charity and we are paying for Michelle Obama's wardrobe." Confused liberals ready to change the subject....

For some reason, (like I don't know), MSNBC has not presented it and the liberals don't realize that Obama is rich too. So much attention is being driven to convincing the public that Mitt Romney is too successful to tolerate that the liberals have forgotten that Obama's wealth was celebrated while he was running against McCain. Yes, Chris Matthews called McCain a loser for not being as rich as Obama.

If the Democrats really care about "little people", and hate the fact that politicians are rich, then why didn't they rebel three years ago against some of the biggest campaign money ever?

Oh, that's right, MSNBC did not tell them to.

MSNBC Trying To Ambush Newt Gingrich, and Gingrich Once Again Leaves the Left Newtered

Muslim Extremists Take Over


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • gmwilliams profile image

      Grace Marguerite Williams 4 years ago from the Greatest City In The World-New York City, New York

      It is quite interesting and informative hub. Elmer T. Williams of the youtube What Happened To Common Sense channel said the same thing. You have made many valid points.

    • Skarlet profile image

      Skarlet 5 years ago from California

      Thank you eternals3ptember. You just made mine.

    • eternals3ptember profile image

      Col. Duke LaCross (...Okay, maybe I lied) 5 years ago from Sherman Oaks (Not the Nice Part, Unfortunantly)

      Oh man this hub made my day! Thank you!

    • Skarlet profile image

      Skarlet 5 years ago from California

      Thank you ib radmasters

      I actually do not watch much television at all. I get at least 70% from the internet. I watch some Fox News.

      What I get out of Fox is, during the daytime there is good hard news coverage from anchors like Brett Bayer, and great market and economy analysis from Neil Cavuto. There are debates by both Democrats and Republicans on the evening shows.

    • ib radmasters profile image

      ib radmasters 5 years ago from Southern California


      Let me ask you a question about what type of news you watch and what you get out of it.

      For me, I got nothing of value out of watching the news. It even takes a half hour or more to get the full weather report. I can get the weather report on the Internet in a few keystrokes.

      just curious...

      BTW, congrats on writing one hundred hubs.

    • Skarlet profile image

      Skarlet 5 years ago from California

      I think its a good idea to avoid watching the news, but I can actually watch it and very often times see plainly what they are trying to "make me think."

      Some people do not question what they hear, and I am convinced that the democratic party is counting on that right now.

    • ib radmasters profile image

      ib radmasters 5 years ago from Southern California


      What if on a designated day, everyone would email the cable news networks, that on that day they refused to watch their shows.

      Most TV rating are done on a sampling of selected viewers, but that is just statistics. Sending the emails would be actual independent viewers.

      The problem with this plan is that the viewers are really as much of the problem as the media. They are addicted to these fountains of opinions.

      I get most if not all of my news from the internet. This is not survivor or dancing with the stars that actually pick a winner, it is verbal spin.

      I know too many people who get their opinions from the media, as opposed to their independent thinking.

      I was once addicted myself, but ten years ago I just dropped the cable news, and I don't watch local news on Network TV. If the media news was a steak, you couldn't eat it because it is over 90% grizzle.


    • Skarlet profile image

      Skarlet 5 years ago from California

      thank you

      I love your comment, and I actually feel a little bit hopeful when I see that so many people here are making sense.

      People are addicted to their own bandage. When Muslim women stand up for the hand that bites them, that is one thing, but when free women are determined to respect dehumanizing someone by making her wear a sack, so that only her eyes show, while, at the same time talking about Mormon life being degrading for women, I lose it.

    • profile image 5 years ago from upstate, NY

      It really makes me laugh when the liberal feminazi's talking up islam. If they knew the what the religion teaches about women, many probably wouldn't be so keen on it! From what I've heard, Islam has a horrific record on womens rights!

      I think you're onto something,in regards to the liberal's Loathing of facts. You've got to remember that the poeple of liberal land are moral relativists, they reject absolutes of right and wrong. They believe our morals change with the times and this may explain why facts aren't important because they can be malleable and made to fit any script the left wants to write!

    • Skarlet profile image

      Skarlet 5 years ago from California

      Haha. I do the same thing. Thank you Patriette:)

    • Patriette profile image

      Patriette 5 years ago from Las Vegas, NV

      Love it! Excellent hub and comments. You really know your liberals, Skarlet. Laughing to keep from crying.... Voting UP!

    • Skarlet profile image

      Skarlet 5 years ago from California

      Thank you so much for your support Don.

    • Don Crowson profile image

      Don Crowson 5 years ago

      It is great when hubbers write the truth. And that is exactlky what you have done. Good hum

    • Skarlet profile image

      Skarlet 5 years ago from California

      Thank you again breakfastpop. The mainstream media keeps people thinking and talking about all this nonsense, and it plays on people's irrational fears. Women are hypersensitive to having their rights taken away, and in reality I think we really know that no President is really focused on that. But, it keeps people emotional, and vulnerable to all of this craziness, while keeping the big picture far in the background.

    • breakfastpop profile image

      breakfastpop 5 years ago

      Obama has the mainstream media in his pocket. He must have quite a few pictures on file. I will never understand what is going on right now. How much more proof do the American people need to realize that we have a very dangerous man in the White House? Voted up and awesome.

    • Skarlet profile image

      Skarlet 5 years ago from California

      Thank you so much Herbert, I really appreciate the supportive feedback. I have often said that we need to focus on "real" issues and get past all this stuff, but most voters base their entire vote on these issues.

      There liberals I am talking about are people with degrees who are educating the public. This is why I get so crazed. I was talking to one of them about the pipeline and the response I got was, "I am more concerned about what Santorum is trying to do to my ovaries." That media brainwashing runs deep. There is no way I was going to convince this woman that Rick Santorum does not want her ovaries.

    • profile image

      Hubert Williams 5 years ago

      Very well done. Dems do get confused with facts.You are right. You have probably started a s....storm. Grab your umbrella.

    • Skarlet profile image

      Skarlet 5 years ago from California

      Thank you for your comments Angela Blair, Davesworld. ib radmasters, and Onusonus.

      @ib radmasters- I agree with you. Sadly, most voters are actually voting based on these issues. This is what happens every time we have an election, and is my point exactly. The media does this because if they did not, the election would be a landslide.

    • Onusonus profile image

      Onusonus 5 years ago from washington

      That stuff about Mormons oppressing their wives is a complete fabrication. LDS families have some of the lowest statistics in the nation for divorce because of the mutual respect they have for one another, and the emphasis the church puts on building family togetherness.

      Making that stuff up about Romney's marriage is pure delusion when you have a big fat Bill and Hillary staring you in the face.

      Well done article.

    • ib radmasters profile image

      ib radmasters 5 years ago from Southern California


      While interesting and even true this is just a distraction on what voters should be doing in the 2012 presidential election.

      In every election the distractions or the red herrings outweigh the important issues.

      The focus should be on the issues, and who would be the best choice to solve the issues. Unfortunately, the two major political parties pick the contenders, and then the loyal party voters pick the one that the party really wants to win.

      The Clintons are certainly not the poster married couple for a model family. But it really doesn't matter if the person that wins the presidency can do their job, that of solving the issues of the country.

      Moral issues like abortion, same sex marriages, etc. cannot be solved by politics. Although the proponents of these issues use politics to further their goals.

      The two party system is the real problem, as they are divisive for the country. Once elected the party should dissolve into the common interest of the country. This has never been true, and it has become more divisive each decade.

      Without a common goal the Congress and the Presidency have reduced the country to the level that we see today. For those people demanding facts, I think all they have to do is look at the United States today. If they are happy with the country as it is today, then they are part of the problem.

      My point is that the distraction by the party to enhance their candidate over the other party's candidate includes the topic of this hub. It also includes the military background of the candidates. When Bill Clinton and Barrack Obama were showcased for the presidency. Their party avoided the whole military background, or lack their off. Clinton was a draft dodger during Vietnam, and even left the country. Obama had no military experience at all. Obama was a presidential candidate when the country was heavily into military action.

      Contrast that when John Kerry was the democratic candidate. The issue became a Vietnam veteran with purple hearts over George W Bush's National Guard.

      Again my point is politics for the sake of distraction to hide the weakness of a party's candidate over the opposition.

      If I exceeded the scope of this hub, then I apologize.

    • Angela Blair profile image

      Angela Blair 5 years ago from Central Texas

      Skarlet -- another Hub with insight and excellent information. As a fellow independent I cheer you on -- excellent read. Best/Sis

    • Davesworld profile image

      Davesworld 5 years ago from Cottage Grove, MN 55016

      If placed in the same position, I doubt Sarah Palin or Ann Romney would remain married to a jerk husband as Hillary has. But then again, Bill was/is Hillary's route to power - which is in keeping with liberal feminist doctrine, don't you know. And as for Bill himself, evidently actions speak softer than words, he says the right things.

    • Skarlet profile image

      Skarlet 5 years ago from California

      Thank you Roderic29. Haha, funny, and well put.

    • Skarlet profile image

      Skarlet 5 years ago from California

      Thank you ata1515.

      @bashraismail- I can't stop laughing at you for your "educating women" statement. Are unaware of the "honor killings" not to mention the acid attacks?

      I mentioned that women are "allowed" to be educated now."Allowed" being the key word. A girl I was in school with is married to a muslim and she has a degree. But, she has to were muslim rags, and is scared of being killed if she leaves her husband. Sorry, this is not a healthy or civilized way to live.

      Obviously you watch The View, and are angry at my pointing out the lack of knowledge these women have. Nothing I do is going to improve their viewership. The only thing I am going is making those, like you, who watch it angry.

    • Rodric29 profile image

      Rodric Johnson 5 years ago from Phoenix, Arizona

      Love it! I do not like it when the pot calls the kettle black and they shop at the same stove! Misdirection, lights, mirrors I feel like I am about to go up in a hot air balloon.

    • bushraismail profile image

      bushraismail 5 years ago from ASIA

      Nice FACTS about muslims.......hehe....i personally know a thousand muslim female graduates alone including cousins are female doctors, managers,bankers..

      I cant stop laughing at your fact. Muslims started educating females 1400 years ago, when the world itself had used women, used them just like a dirty old rag cloth.

      I agree to ur point that most marriages are for show and what you are doing (writing this hub including those marriage fakers names)your simply helping them improve their show and publicity.

    • ata1515 profile image

      ata1515 5 years ago from Buffalo, New York.

      You are certain to ruffle feathers with this one. Interesting take on it all, voted up and shared!