Toward the end of Governor Romney's convention speech, he claimed:
"That united America will care for the poor and the sick, will honor and respect the elderly, and will give a helping hand to those in need."
Food for the starving, universal health care for ALL, and guaranteed college education to those who desire to go and are intellectually able.
My question is: why is Romney a Republican?
I wasn't going to bother, but oh well.
1 - Do Democrats have a corner on the market of 'helping people'? That would be news to me.
2 - You seem to criticize Romney when he says something you disagree with and when he says something you agree with.
3 - Did he say anything about universal healthcare, or universal college education?
He said nothing about universal healthcare, or universal college education; however, his principles are perfectly in line with most liberals. He just isn't following them for some reason! It's quite odd really :p
Yes, he DOES follow them. He not only talks the talk, he walks the walk. He gives of his money AND his time to help others.
No. He does not follow them. If you are a Republican in favor of gutting the social safety net, increasing defense spending, opening up every square inch of the earth to oil tycoons, giving huge tax cuts to the wealthy, and are a homophobic bigot (though he just recently became this when he decided to run for President), no, you do not follow those principles.
So, you're saying that Romney has NOT helped the poor, the sick, or those in need, which you quoted in your original post? I guess the IRS and all those folks Mitt helped are lying. Please tell me how many times Obama has visited the sick and counseled those in need. And Biden's charitable contributions are a joke. Dems are always generous with OTHER people's money, but when it comes to their own cash, they can be pretty stingy. Have you really read Romney's plan? I can't find where it says it does away with safety nets and social programs. You do know that the number of Americans in poverty is higher now, right?
If I have 500 million dollars, and I hoard 300 million of it in offshore accounts to avoid paying taxes on it, give 5 million to my church, and support cutting my own taxes and others that are wealthy, cutting social programs, and privatizing medicare, no, he has not helped to the extent that he should.
The government policies he supports have nothing to do with wealthy. There are middle class voters who want to screw the poor also, at least until they lose their job, then they want unemployment insurance and food stamps... But I digress.
Do you understand we have this massive amount of poverty when there is a safety net AND charities. It's nothing for you to donate money to charity if you are filthy rich thanks to your daddy's connections, and your ability to skim off the work of others. Why does he need all that money, while people are starving to death, can't afford a college education, or are being poisoned by corporations?
Democrats aren't much better, but they aren't openly advocating taking steps to begin the destruction of the social safety net, which is what the "Path to Prosperity" does. Romney has said he and Paul Ryan agree on the vast majority of the points within it.
Do Democrats have a corner on the market of 'helping people'?
Do you approve or disapprove of Romney being socially moderate?
I was thinking the same thing you said in point #2, but I think you meant for that second "disagree" to be "agree." lol
It must be a political thing, as the Republicans do the same to Democrats.
Romney is not a Democrat because Democrats want more food stamps, more welfare, more free healthcare, bigger government and oh, they want someone else to pay for it.
This stops working when those who are paying for all these programs realize it is better to live in a different country.
A united America can do all the things Romney said, but America will never be united as long as Obama is pushing a cultural war between the rich and the poor, the young and the old, man and women.
Now hold on just a minute.
Romney said "a united America."
He did not say "The United States of America' (meaning government).
One could (if so inclined) interpret the comment to mean that until America unites, those feel-good things for her citizens will not happen.
In other words, given the extremely divisive partisanship in evidence today, it will be a cold day in hell before the poor, sick, elderly and needy are cared for here!
Cynical much, MM?
MM is talking to herself again on HP...
Don't worry MM, the nice people will be along with your jacket shortly
But good point, there was quite a bit of rhetoric about united Americans/communities/churches helping each other out, and not just in Romney's speech.
"Mitt Romney, it turns out, is the perfect frontman for Wall Street's greed revolution. He's not a two-bit, shifty-eyed huckster like Lloyd Blankfein. He's not a sighing, eye-rolling, arrogant jerkwad like Jamie Dimon. But Mitt believes the same things those guys believe: He's been right with them on the front lines of the financialization revolution, a decades-long campaign in which the old, simple, let's-make-stuff-and-sell-it manufacturing economy was replaced with a new, highly complex, let's-take-stuff-and-trash-it financial economy. Instead of cars and airplanes, we built swaps, CDOs and other toxic financial products. Instead of building new companies from the ground up, we took out massive bank loans and used them to acquire existing firms, liquidating every asset in sight and leaving the target companies holding the note. The new borrow-and-conquer economy was morally sanctified by an almost religious faith in the grossly euphemistic concept of "creative destruction," and amounted to a total abdication of collective responsibility by America's rich, whose new thing was making assloads of money in ever-shorter campaigns of economic conquest, sending the proceeds offshore, and shrugging as the great towns and factories their parents and grandparents built were shuttered and boarded up, crushed by a true prairie fire of debt."
From Matt Taibbi
by Julie Grimes6 years ago
What is Mitt Romney's true agenda for America?He is not a proponent for the separation of church and state. What does this mean for the future of America's future with a man like this in the oval office?
by ParadigmShift...6 years ago
What are the fundamental differences between the Democratic and Republican parties??Can there be a happy medium?
by Thomas Byers5 years ago
What do you think about Mitt Romney being the first president in U.S. History to have millions stashed in offshore Tax Havens. You know I saw this tonight and it really bothers me that we keep letting people like this...
by Dr Billy Kidd5 years ago
Men like Romney better than they do Obama. Is It Romney's ability to make money that they admire?
by Jean Bakula5 years ago
I thought Mrs. Romney was very artificial and stiff. The things she said about all the roles we women play were true, but more for our Mother's generation. She was discussing things like helping the kids write the book...
by GA Anderson5 years ago
How did the Republican party get started?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.