After the Associated Press released an extremely misleading article explaining how a particular graph proved that Iran was building a nuclear weapon, scientists at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, and journalists at AntiWar.com did the AP's job for them by pointing out that the graph says nothing of the sort, and that most government agencies agree that Iran abandoned its weapons program in 2003.
AP's propaganda: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ap-exclu … rking-bomb
The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists' debunking: http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/ … hic-design
Anti-War's analysis: http://news.antiwar.com/2012/11/27/ap-p … s-program/
I really find it astonishing that usually dependable people on both the left and right are fooled by this notion again, considering what happened with Iraq.
Please, not only are they building, they already have one or two.
by Ralph Deeds 7 years ago
How serious and immediate is a nuclear threat from Iran? What should we do about it? Some of the same hawks who helped talk us into invading Iraq are coming out of the woodwork and saying that a nuclear Iran is intolerable and something must be done to prevent it from happening. A timely and...
by dadibobs 7 years ago
If Iran was to succeed in developing a nuclear weapon, how should our own nations react?Would we strike at the construction facitily, and possible storage sites?, or do we just use a nuclear weapon on them first?. Would more sanctions and embargo's actually do anything to prevent them from...
by Harvey Stelman 9 years ago
Who among you is willing to admit they did not believe Iran wanted nuclear weapons? Talk the talk, now walk the walk!
by rhamson 9 years ago
With Irans new revelations that they have a secret site for the nuclear capabilities is this the latest step in the path to a nuclear war?
by AngelTrader 7 years ago
It is all falling neatly into place for the US to attack Iran on behalf of Saudi Arabia. The US views the plot as state-sponsored terrorism. Secretary of state Hillary Clinton described it as a "violation of international norms" and said she would discuss with allies in Europe and...
by Zubair Ahmed 7 years ago
Professor Francis Boyle, the person who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 enacted by the US Congress, said that in 2001-2004, the US Federal Government spent $14.5 billion for civilian bio-warfare-related work. What other purpose does this serve but to kill people?The US and...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|