What if Assad used small Tactical Nukes Instead of Chemical Weapons?

Jump to Last Post 1-4 of 4 discussions (25 posts)
  1. My Esoteric profile image86
    My Esotericposted 10 years ago

    Let's say Israel hadn't bombed the Syrian nuclear program into oblivion decades ago, or the world lets Iran develop nuclear capability and they ship some suitcase nukes to Assad, or North Korea sneaked some in.  In any case, what I am posing is what if Assad had tactical nukes.  Now, instead of chemical weapons he uses these "low-yield" nuclear devices on the opposition.  They devastate about a 2-mile radius and the lethal  fall-out will probably stay inside Syria's borders, depending on winds. 

    SO, should we let Assad use these weapons for the same reasons we seem to want to let him use chemical weapons?

    1. cmoneyspinner1tf profile image84
      cmoneyspinner1tfposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Should we let Assad?  (???)  Who's letting him do what he's already doing?  USA and everybody else may be undecided on how to deal with Syria.  But Israel isn't.  Israel say they gonna stay on the map!  No bluff!!  Wish we all know what to do in cases like this?

      1. My Esoteric profile image86
        My Esotericposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        You make an interesting point.  If the US and the rest of the world don't take Assad's use of chemicals seriously, will Israel?  I suspect they might for they have a lot at stake if Assad feels empowered to use WMD by the actions of the US people and Congress to prevent the anti-war President Obama from setting aside his principles and attempting to make Assad understand the use of chemical weapons are off the table.

    2. MG Singh profile image79
      MG Singhposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Frankly one shouldn't even think about it. Just 2 bombs and Israel will cease to exist. Its such a small country. It's better Israel comes to an understanding with its Muslim neighbors. Frankly using poison gas and Nuclear bombs are 2 different things. Nuclear bombs have a half life period of some 60 years and life will be dead for that period. No, Assad will not use nuclear weapons though the USA might. After all they killed 300,000 in the atomic bombing of Japan.

    3. My Esoteric profile image86
      My Esotericposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      I watched Obama's Prime Time talk tonight.  He did the best he could given the fast changing situation and the histrionics from the Right and the Left.  For example, the Progressives said of his speech:

      "9:45 p.m. ET - The Progressive Change Campaign Committee, a left-leaning advocacy group that has been opposed to military action in Syria, responded to the address saying "public pressure worked.""

      - BULL PUCKY!  Public pressure had nothing to do with it although it is clear Obama has been paying attention to what was being said as he addressed each of the rationale arguments.

      Then the Right had this equally stupid thing to say:

      9:43 p.m. ET - Republicans National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus responded to the president's address by saying, “The administration’s handling of the U.S. response to Syria has been so haphazard it’s disappointed even the president’s most ardent supporters."

      “This rudderless diplomacy has embarrassed America on the world stage. For a president who campaigned on building American credibility abroad, the lack of leadership coming from the Oval Office is astounding," Priebus added.

      BULL PUCKY!  It doesn't deserve anymore comment.

      Both the Progressive spokesman and Priebus must have gone to the same political unintelligence school.  The only difference is when they got their Stupid Diploma and walked out the door, one turned Left and the other turned Right.

  2. cmoneyspinner1tf profile image84
    cmoneyspinner1tfposted 10 years ago

    "They" say there's proof chemical weapons were used.  Not sure if they also said the proof trail leads straight to Assad.  (I don't have cable TV.)  If so, then not only does Assad need to be stopped from doing it again but whoever supplied him with the weapons needs to go down too!  I'm anti-war but pro-self-defense.  The perpetrator and the accomplice(s) are both guilty of crimes against humanity!  Aren't there international rules about this kind of stuff?

    1. My Esoteric profile image86
      My Esotericposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, the latest Geneva Convention which 97% of the world has signed up to allows stockpiling but not use of chemical weapons.  The intelligence the Congressman are being show is supposed to have classified film of Assad's forces using chemical weapons, which makes Assad responsible; it is his troops.  The Russian's, who I doubt supply the chemicals, sarin gas can be made easily enough, probably help with the technology to use, store, and mix them safely.  (Sarin gas itself degrades quickly, so, like epoxy glue, the components are kept separated until needed.)

      You are probably lucky not to have cable.

      1. cmoneyspinner1tf profile image84
        cmoneyspinner1tfposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        I noticed the responses you're receiving.  I'm thinking I answered the question so I'm done here!  Great question! smile

  3. sannyasinman profile image58
    sannyasinmanposted 10 years ago

    The Syrian Govt did not use chemical weapons. This is a false flag operation (just like the non-existent WMDs in Iraq) to try to justify a war with Syria which has been planned for years.   
    See the evidence in this video from the mouths of General Wesley Clarke, Ron Paul and others . . .

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl … 8fiTc#t=13

    1. My Esoteric profile image86
      My Esotericposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      There wasn't one iota of evidence in that video, just people's opinions who are opposed to intervening in Syria (accept for Clark, who was talking about Iraq, which I also opposed, not Syria).

      The gov't, on the other hand does have hard video evidence which has convinced such anti-war Doves as Obama, Feinstein, Boxer, and Polosi that something must be done.

      Nevertheless, you didn't answer the question I posed.

      1. sannyasinman profile image58
        sannyasinmanposted 10 years agoin reply to this

        I did answer your question. The Syrian Govt did not use chemical weapons, and therefore the second part of your question is not relevant.

        You want evidence? The evidence is that this is a false flag operation designed to provide an excuse to invade Syria, and that it was the rebel forces backed by the USA that used these weapons.
        Russia even presented the UN with a 100 page scientific report to back this up. 

        By contrast the evidence of Kerry is flakey to say the least. Doesn't this smell like Iraq and the non-existent WMDs all over again, to you?

        High-Level U.S. Intelligence Officers say that Syrian Government Did Not Launch Chemical Weapons
        http://www.globalresearch.ca/high-level … ns/5348643

        Obama & Kerry Caught Misleading the public on Syria & Weapons Inspectors
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl … AUByw#t=81

        Fake photos to justify war
        http://chasvoice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09 … -from.html

        UK-US Backed Terrorist Rebel Fighter is also FAKE  Sarin Gas Attack Victim
        http://nodisinfo.com/Home/takfiri-terro … eat-video/

        http://www.globalresearch.ca/did-the-wh … ck/5347542

        http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/09/03 … us-record/

        And regarding tactical nuclear weapons, do you mean like the ones used by the USA in Iraq?  Have you seen the photos on the Internet of the terribly deformed childen now being born in Iraq because of this? And what about the white phospherous used against the Palestinians in Gaza?

        Aren't you outraged? The USA decides to be the worlds policeman, but who is policing the USA?

        1. wilderness profile image95
          wildernessposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          OMG - do we now have a conspiracy theory that the US set off nuclear explosions in Iraq, explosions that were hidden from the rest of the world by their respective governments?

          Absolutely unbelievable what lengths some people will go to in their hatred of their country.

        2. My Esoteric profile image86
          My Esotericposted 10 years agoin reply to this

          To all of your offerings, except the second one, @Sanny, I give you this from the Foreign Policy Blog, http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/201 … s_truthers

          For the second on, there is http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Timeli … ia-324303.

          1. sannyasinman profile image58
            sannyasinmanposted 10 years agoin reply to this

            I respect your right to believe whatever you want to believe. I have read your links.

            Your first link: There are many examples throughout history of governments (including the US) using false flag operations, involving killing their own people, in order to achieve what they would not have achieved otherwise. It is a practice which works because people just refuse to believe that THEIR president/ king / Prime minister would do such a thing. This is precisely the argument used in your link. As I say, you have the right to  believe whatever you like - even a president who has broken almost every single promise he made to you before being elected. Its your choice.   

            Your second link: The head of the UN is appointed by the USA. Do you really expect him to oppose US policy? However, the vast majority of member states of the UN OPPOSE the US action in Syria, as do the majority of people in the USA, and its "war allies" UK and France.

            "crossing the red-line" by accusing Assad of using chemical weapons is just the latest in a string of attempts to force a war with Syria. And I say again, if you choose to believe the constant propaganda put out by CNN, the BBC and other mainstream media that is your choice, but viewer numbers for CNN are plumetting as more and more people are questioning "the offical line" and seeking the other side of the argument, via alternative news channels and the Internet. The constant bombardment of info on TV about the guilty Syrian Govt is an attempt make the people believe what they want you to believe.

            Who was it that said "Tell a lie often enough and eventually the people will believe it"

            1. cmoneyspinner1tf profile image84
              cmoneyspinner1tfposted 10 years agoin reply to this

              @sannyasinman - "force a war with Syria"?  Just for clarification.  Syria is already AT WAR with ... themselves?  Is that a lie?  Cause I really don't believe everything I hear on on TV.

              If true, what's a reasonable viable alternative?  Just wait until they kill each other, then move in and take over what's left?

              I'm all for CORRECT INTELLIGENCE.  How can anyone make good decisions without them?  I mean if the information you get is BOGUS!  How can you even discuss it let alone decide to GO TO WAR based on it?

              @esoteric - I said I was done but then I checked my eMail and this was in it.  smile

              1. Uninvited Writer profile image82
                Uninvited Writerposted 10 years agoin reply to this

                Isn't he/she going to look ridiculous when they decide on a non military solution, which they are heading towards.

                1. My Esoteric profile image86
                  My Esotericposted 10 years agoin reply to this

                  Actually no, @Uninvited, he won't, instead, he will look brilliant because it is clear this would not have come about without his credible threat of military action in the first place.

                  1. cmoneyspinner1tf profile image84
                    cmoneyspinner1tfposted 10 years agoin reply to this

                    If I decided (I'm a "she") ... If I decided on a non military solution and it worked!  I wouldn't care if I looked like Bozo the Clown!!

            2. My Esoteric profile image86
              My Esotericposted 10 years agoin reply to this

              @Sanny, saying things like "The head of the UN is appointed by the USA ..." and other clearly false statements puts your veracity in serious doubt and makes one wonder if you don't live in an alternate reality.

              1. sannyasinman profile image58
                sannyasinmanposted 10 years agoin reply to this

                The head of the UN is chosen / appointed by the government of the USA (covertly, of course). Don't believe me, that's OK. You need to look outside of the mainstream media theater propaganda circus to have any idea how the world really works . . .  and yes, I do live in a reality which is different to the dreamworld that you believe to be real.

                1. wilderness profile image95
                  wildernessposted 10 years agoin reply to this

                  Wrong.  God does a little surgery on Satan, removing horns and tail, clothes him in a suit and installs him as the head of the UN.  Don't believe me?  That's OK - I live in a different reality than your dreamworld.

                  Useful comment, isn't it?  I'm sure you found it so, just as everyone else finds your unsupported claim that the US secretly picks the head extremely valuable.

  4. maxoxam41 profile image63
    maxoxam41posted 10 years ago

    That's the stupidest theory I've ever read and it is not worthy of any answer. So far Israel attacked its neighborhood showing us its bellicose intentions, we never assess or theorize about its danger to the survival of the middle east, do we?

    1. My Esoteric profile image86
      My Esotericposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      That is an interesting take on things, @maxo, not sure how well it jives with reality, but interesting nevertheless; it also didn't answer the question that was posed either.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)