Many people see the 1st Amendment today as an avenue to say “whatever they want” without regards of the feelings of others. However, according to the United States Exceptions of Free Speech: “Speeches that involve incitement, false statements of fact, obscenity, child pornography, threats and speeches owned by others are completely exempt from First Amendment protection.” (Source: Wikipedia)
Are you aware of the United States Free Speech Exceptions?
It would be nice if those exceptions were taught in the schools, so the present generation, and those to follow, were aware of them. Great post!
Unfortunately, most people don't realize it, but basically most of us don't have the right to testify in court in our own defense when accused of a crime. I'll post the explanation and details of that little surprise fact on my website sometime next year.
Everyone has that right but it is not always advisable If the attorney determines that testifying could hurt a person's case, their testimony is withheld. C.L.A.
Certain laws had to be amended by making minor changes to the text, legislation, etc. in order to make it more fair and more accurate, changes are made to reflect changing circumstances:
The free speech exceptions that you mentioned Jacqueline are also violations of speech that God forbids so, it goes deeper than what's allowed in the constitution. On the other hand, it is best to know how an angry person is feeling as opposed to them eventually acting out that anger which often times can resort to physical harm or someone's death. Today, it is called allowing someone to vent their anger about whatever or whoever, and that is a form of therapeutic treatment. You've heard someone say "I just had to get it off my chest or get it out." Violations of speech should be regarded as words of disrespect or dishonor unless the words are violations of the law like threats. But again, they go deeper than the constitution especially if a person is considered an abider of the gospel truth.
Freedom of speech is intended for some good… not some bad. We need those boundaries to protect us from the abuse of freedom of speech.
I am continually amazed at the people who cite "freedom of speech" to post cowardly and hateful statements on-line and don't have the guts to use their real names. That behavior is only cowardly and bullying, not freedom of speech. I am not referencing anything here, simply venting a pet peeve that I have about on-going #CowardlyComments that I see daily on-line and if challenged, the cowards cite the 1st Amendment...okay - vent over, and yes. my name is my real name.
I have a couple questions, one might be easier than the other. "false statements of fact". When did that get in there? I'm completely ignorant of that exception in the US. I'm aware that Germany has laws against holocaust denial, but I don't recall anything like "false statements of fact" in US law. We impeached a president over lying under oath, but that sounds completely different. Second, how do interpretations of the US 1st amendment (freedom of speech) relate to global interpretations, specifically publishing things on HubPages?
There is a blog called "First Amendment Exceptions and What the First Amendment Means." I truly suggest that you type this into your search engine. I brought up this information for discussion purposes only and do not claim to have a degree in law. This website is hosted by Stanford University School of Law. Any other questions that you have that are specific to law should be referred to a lawyer.
I would have to do research in order to answer this question but since you may have others on this subject I will refer you to this blog. You could also google Stanford School of Law or any university that has a Law School. They should definitely give you thorough information on the subject!
As you will note I did reference Wikipedia as my source of information. My degrees are in Human Resource Management and Education :-)
Thanks for the tip. I'll try to get up to speed, since I'm active in other HubPages forums where people all over the world are discussing free speech.
Quick Wikipedia summary of the legality of "false statements of fact": the US Supreme Court has struggled with how to interpret this, it includes libel and slander, and since 1964 government lies have been legal to a degree.
Quick clarification in order to paint "KU37" as a normal-thinking person regarding my reference above to "holocaust denial": I am sympathetic to holocaust victims, and I find the ideas of holocaust deniers repellent. I'm not antisemitic but I disagree with many of Israel's policies. Although I understand Germany has a different political situation than the US, making holocaust denial illegal goes against my American sensibilities about free speech.
by Kathryn L Hill 2 hours ago
We need to keep in mind that freedom of speech was created for some Good. (As in disseminating what is True.)Not some Bad. (As in Lying.)There seems to be a lot of abuse of free speech on the internet and ELSEWHERE!
by RealityTalk 5 years ago
Is freedom of speech compromised in America today?It appears difficult to publish articles pertaining to racism, unless the racist in question is white skinned. It also appears difficult to publish articles pertaining to same-sex marriage if the article is anti-same-sex marriage; even if the...
by irachx 12 months ago
Do we really have freedom of speech?
by Jeff Berndt 5 years ago
So we have freedom of speech in the US, but we also have a crime called "incitement to riot."If you want to commit that crime, what you need to do is get up in front of a group of people, and say some words. If the words you say make the crowd angry enough to run around assaulting other...
by Amanda Littlejohn 4 years ago
Which is more important, freedom of faith or freedom of speech?Many religious folks are decent, good people. Some of my best friends subscribe to institutionalised superstition - and are good humored enough to let me say that without taking offense. But most religions per se enshrine some deeply...
by LoliHey 20 months ago
Doesn't freedom of speech mean that there are no consequences?Lately we hear about people losing their jobs for stuff they tweet and post. People say, "Well, freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences." I beg to differ, though. You're supposed to be able...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|