Who can be so blind as to believe that it could ever end ? Terror and all that we know about it , is eternal , and so the war against it ! Much like the history of war itself . Isn't terrorism simply the weaker opponent's offensive action against an enemy , by definition ?.
How blind to this by percentage do you think the masses are ?
I don't see that as a very good definition. Rather, terrorism is intentional targeting of non-combatant centers/peoples for the express purpose of spreading fear and horror. 911, beheading journalists, shooting schools of children; none of these can have any military effect at all. Just fear.
Not really a good definition. There can be no association between a government and a terrorist group, and the terrorist group will still assault the other state for, simply, having different ideals than them. That state could have no distinction for the specific group.
The masses are not blind to it but they are seemingly helpless to be of any effect against it. The War On Terror will end, but not as most would think. Extreme ideologies, be it global assimilation, economics, theology, technology, medicine, mythology -even sexuality- can all be classified as forms of terrorization, depending on the perspective of the viewer and expression of the doer. Eradication or fusion of one leads to another, to a shift in power. The small percentage of leaders, worldwide, know this. They also know an end must come. The game is to see who ends up with the most marbles when the dust settles.
In recent days, this particular pressing by the group known as Daesh was foreseen nearly 75 years ago when The Plan for Balkanization of the Middle Eastern region began. Under the guise of a theology, a powerful one at that (5 Billion members strong), the leaders of the world have decided to use these people as pawns to further the end game. History notes this was previously done with Christianity, as well as Hebrew/Jewish, Persian/Babylonian, Macedonian/Greek, pre-Christian Roman -even Buddhism, via Genghis Khan...
The few control the many, which is, perhaps, the greatest terror of all.
Why did everything start to get labeled Terror or Terrorism? After sept.11th every violent incident got labelled terror. This created the so called need for security which by default is causing the loss of our freedoms.
Religion if based on fear.
The world is run on fear rather than love first.
Fear is your terror and more love is you solution.
Quite frankly terrorism has been around quite a while ! Modern terrorism probably began in the mid east yet also long before then ! The bigger question might actually be ; Why don't soo many people understand that the war on terror is an unending war , that some form of Gitmo will always be required to house the terrorist POW's, AND ,that there may be some that can never be set free ?
Those of you who wish to close Gitmo might offer up an importation of these terrorists to your own country ! Fat chance there .
The war on terrorism will never end because it is how governments justify and make their turnovers. Academi, Raytheon, Dyncorp are our government 's supplier and masters. If Obama decides to wage war in the US against citizens or abroad the lobbies behind him are both his CEO and supplier. They work in tandem. They coexist. If the US citizen is not afraid, he will refuse any intervention abroad, it is the reason why we have to stimulate with few bombings here and there... In Boston, in New York (sept 11). Who can justify an increase of military, intelligence, surveillance budget if the nation is peaceful, tranquil. No, our government has to shake our torpor.
Terrorism will end with economical collapse. When our government will face restrictions, when our taxes won't flow anymore in their pockets to act with impunity then a new paradigm will be drawn.
You see John , I believe that's what would have happened before the big political correctness surrender of action against , talking about action , and its what many, many people wish would happen now . Refund the CIA it's deposit to the leftist media and go back to the days when Langley was the whole war machine against world terror .
In a way that's what's happening now ," secret agents" a Micro-war , drones , intelligence , rockets , Why do you think that the world just adores James Bond --yet can't get out of its cradle in the morning against really bad people !
Enjoy your freedom of movement !
Don't worry though John , dissidents are just that , they don't disappear here they just multiply although the last ones to commit to the costs of freedoms , and the first to whine about the lack of them ! Ahh - the cries that come from the cradles of freedoms ! May they one day learn to contribute the costs of them !
What are you on about?
I was talking about innocent people being held in Gitmo with no evidence and no chance of an honest trial.
Your proof of their innocence (you make the claim, after all) and that there is no evidence? Or are you just talking through your hat, making claims you cannot substantiate?
I can't be bothered searching for specific people but here's the first one I found
http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/1 … in-kuwait/
I don't suppose an apology will be forthcoming? No, I thought not.
by Chris Mills 2 years ago
Could the war on terror ever be called World War III?The Wikipedia definition of World War is "a war involving many or most of the world's most powerful and populous countries. World wars span multiple countries on multiple continents, with battles fought in multiple theatres." ...
by cooldad 5 years ago
Now that we all have had time to reflect, was the United States war on terrorism valid?Or, did our instant gratification culutre, react to quickly based on emotion and fear?I think American people are easily led by fear and were easily sold on the war on terror like a good beer commercial. ...
by cooldad 3 years ago
I can't help but wonder if the United States could be considered a terrorist nation. With its actions in the past and the present, can the U.S. be considered terrorists?The treatment of Native Americans, slavery, Cambodia bombing, Iraq, Afghanistan are just a few potential examples.What are...
by Lince 16 months ago
Don't you think Pakistan should be called a "terror sponsor of terrorism" by the United States?There are various proofs of Pakistan officials giving aid and also giving shelter to many terrorists.So don't you think it should be called be a terrorist state?
by Susan Reid 5 years ago
I hate that term, but didn't quite know how to phrase it better.Obviously, there have been a LOT of incidents and investigations in the last fewmonths that have raised terrorists and US security to new levels of scrutiny.So my questions: Using 9/11 as baseline, how have "terrorism" and/or...
by shinujohn2008 9 years ago
India is on the verge of starting a war with Pakistan. The Indian Air forces are now moving towards the borders and waiting to get commands from Officials to attack Pakistan occupied kashmir and smash Terrorist camps. CNN, Times Now and Headlines have reported such moves by Indian Army.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|