Did Michael Flynn lie to the FBI?

Jump to Last Post 1-2 of 2 discussions (11 posts)
  1. Don W profile image83
    Don Wposted 17 months ago

    It is a federal offense to lie to the FBI. The offense is called "Making False Statements":

    "Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully

    (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
    (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
    (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry
    " (U.S. Code ยง 1001)(1)

    The FBI interviewed Flynn about his contact with Russian officials in the first days of the Trump administration(2).

    Presumably Flynn was asked if he had contact with Russian officials, and he said he had. That's not really the issue. It's extremely unlikely that the Logan Act, which prohibits private citizens engaging in diplomacy with foreign states, would be invoked here.

    However, it is an issue if Flynn was asked whether his conversation included sanctions, and he said "no". That would be a "materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent" statement to the FBI, which is a crime punishable by a fine, a maximum prison sentence of 5 years, or both(3)

    On Feb 14 White House Spokesperson, Sean Spicer, said:

    "The president was very concerned that General Flynn had misled the vice president and others."(4)

    So the question is, was the FBI one of the "others" who have been misled?

    If so, it would be very difficult for the FBI not to recommend prosecution.

    The decision to prosecute would sit with the DoJ though, and the chances of Jeff (too racist to be a federal judge in the 80s) Sessions prosecuting this case would be slim.

    However, the chances of Flynn's answers to the FBI being leaked to the press, are much higher, and if it's clear he made false statements, that would make it extremely difficult for Sessions to justify not prosecuting.

    If I were a journalist, I'd be trying to get confirmation of exactly what Flynn was asked by the FBI and what his responses were (NYT, WaPo etc. over to you).

    The next question would then be: what did Trump know, and when did he know it?

    (1)(3) https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001
    (2) https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics … ar-AAmWsPP
    (4) https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-of … 2142017-12

    1. Don W profile image83
      Don Wposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      Update

      The Washington Post have reported that Flynn denied discussing sanctions with the Russian ambassador when interviewed by the FBI(1).

      This means Flynn made a "materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation" to the FBI, which is a felony(2).

      However, CNN are quoting a law enforcement official as saying the FBI is "not expected to pursue any charges" against Flynn(3).

      That doesn't mean Flynn cannot be prosecuted. The decision to prosecute sits with the DoJ. But again,  the exact nature of Flynn's denial to the FBI is important.

      According to CNN, FBI agents challenged Flynn when he said he had not discussed sanctions, because obviously they knew he was lying, and Flynn said he "didn't remember"(4).

      That may be enough for the DoJ to justify not prosecuting, which Jeff (too racist to be a federal judge in the 80s) Sessions would be reluctant to do anyway [note: his racism isn't relevant to this case, I just like to be accurate in my description of him].

      Based purely on evidence currently available to the public, even if the Attorney General wasn't so contemptible, I think it would be very unlikely for a prosecution against Flynn to succeed anyway.

      But at least my question has been answered.

      Yes, Michael Flynn (former US national security advisor) lied to the FBI about discussing sanctions with Russia.

      That's bad. That's very very bad.

      (1) https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na … d92d8d6a4e

      (2) https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

      (3)(4) http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/16/polit … index.html

      1. Live to Learn profile image80
        Live to Learnposted 17 months agoin reply to this

        Maybe Bill had a friendly chat with the DOJ. That was all that was needed to ensure Hillary wasn't prosecuted.

        1. Don W profile image83
          Don Wposted 17 months agoin reply to this

          If you have a verified, recorded conversation between Bill Clinton and someone at the DOJ (like the one the FBI has of Flynn and the Russian ambassador), which specifically captures him lobbying against prosecution, you better get it to the Trump administration right away. They could really use a smokescreen at the moment

          If not, I suggest you stop promoting fake news. President Bannon doesn't like it (unless it's flattering to "president" Trump).

  2. jackclee lm profile image80
    jackclee lmposted 17 months ago

    Don, did Hillary lie to the FBI, did she lied to Congress???
    You are trying to score political points to what avail?
    You have got what you wanted and removed a competent person in Trump's admin.
    Is there anything else you want? Should Trump step down as Commander in chief?
    would that be your goal?
    Really, I am asking what is it that you want?

    1. Don W profile image83
      Don Wposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      Clinton was investigated 9 times over one incident. Investigated by 5 different panels and the FBI over another. And still, nearly two months after the election, you are asking whether she lied to Congress.

      That's exactly the level of scrutiny I want applied to Trump and his officials. 

      I want to know whether Michael Flynn lied to the FBI

      If he did:

           I want to know whether the FBI will recommend prosecution, and if not why?

           I want to know whether the DoJ will prosecute, and if not why?

           I want to know when Trump knew Flynn lied to the FBI.

           I want to know why Trump did not fire Flynn immediately if there was some delay.

      If Flynn did not lie to the FBI:

      I want to know why Trump allowed Flynn to continue as a member of the National Security Council for three weeks after the DoJ told him Flynn was compromised by the Russians.

      I want to know when the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence will begin an inquiry into Trump and his administration's ties to Russia, as a matter of national security.

      I want to know why Trump supporters are so keen on national security when it's being used as the reason to ban Muslims, or investigate Clinton, but not so keen when it comes to establishing whether the president or any of his other officials have inappropriate ties to adversarial foreign states.

      If you can provide any of the answers to those questions, feel free to . . .

    2. psycheskinner profile image81
      psycheskinnerposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      That's a lot of questions from someone who didn't bother to answer OP's question at all.
      Turn about is far play... and a more constructive way to have a discussion.

    3. ptosis profile image84
      ptosisposted 17 months agoin reply to this

      YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!    YES!   
      http://cdn.meme.am/instances/400x/53174827.jpg
      http://kristamoore.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/yes-man1.jpg
      YES! and YES!!!!!!!!

      https://img.wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/eagle-meme.jpg

      http://occupydemocrats.com/wp-content/uploads/impeach.jpg
      https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-P1l3lM1WWJg/WKB5259CWrI/AAAAAAAAME0/rk5-G6g2AZw25UqKfGpkfZ0VHM3LFkF5wCLcB/s640/01-TRUMP%2BTHE%2BVILE.png

      1. ahorseback profile image76
        ahorsebackposted 17 months agoin reply to this

        Feb 17th 2017, -FBI announces --NO INVESTIGATION FOR FLYNN .

        So much for your "fake news ".

        1. ptosis profile image84
          ptosisposted 17 months agoin reply to this

          Oh, you mean the DOJ Jeff Sessions?  He is investigating the WH leaks.

          1. ahorseback profile image76
            ahorsebackposted 17 months agoin reply to this

            Lets face it most of the top tier employees are still Obama  appointees. no doubt ,   Suffice to say if their are no investigations ---there was no offence !

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)