Jumping to conclusions way too fast are we?
Or knowing FULL WELL what we are doing?
Trump held President Assad responsible for chemical weapons use … and acted on it with military air strikes. Was his accusation based on fact? Were his military orders justified?
"The Syrian army has denied using any chemical or toxic substances in air strikes launched Tuesday, according to state media, and blamed “terrorist groups and those behind them.”
The Syrian government routinely refers to most opponents of the regime as terrorists."
"...The suspected chemical attack *believed* to have been carried out by Syrian government forces killed at least 70 people in the rebel-held Idlib province on Tuesday. Thirty-two victims have been brought to Turkey and three have subsequently died during treatment.
That said, while the presence of sarin gas will almost surely be confirmed, the question remains how the west will prove *whose* sarin gas it was, although since like in 2013 the "chemical attack" appears to have been a goalseeked event intended to result in a goalseeked outcome, namely to get the US involved in the Syria conflict once again with the intent of removing Assad, we have little doubt that the narrative of Assad - *who had little to gain and everything to lose from the alleged gas release* - being behind the attack will hardly be challenged in the legacy press."
FROM: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-0 … al-weapons
I chose to believe that was as much of a "False Flag" as the U.S.'s 9/11 because http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/30842.html is showing some details not revealed on mainstream TV [my hub https://hubpages.com/politics/Why-And-H … Overthrown shows it concerning 9/11]. Trump should not have done anything until, if it is possible to determine the source of the sarin gas it was, there is proof of who is responsible for it. Had he seen that video he should have said the U.S.will have no part in it.
There are chemical attacks and WMD attacks that deserve no quarters as to justifications , nerve gas , dirty bomb , even nuclear , If and when they happen , they must be dealt with immediately . Today's technology allows the proper officials in the military to know where they are , who controls them and who uses them . And treaties dictate whats to happen when they are used .
What most people need to concern themselves with is imagining what would you want done if it were in the neighborhood next to yours ------because it will be sooner than not !
AHB, It doesn't appears that you know what's happening in the world. The US and most other predominantly European controlled areas of the world will not likely be a party to any of those things for 3 to 4 years. That because their militaries know where WMDs are located, only the European nations have them.
Like 9/11, it was U.S. plotted and accomplished although they knew there were no WMDs in Iraq, so, why did the US go to war there or Afghan? It is all about the NWO the European nations have been working to achieve with the intent of eliminating all except about 500 million people "the power that THINK they be" believe they can control.
Everyone following the "American Dream" will remain sleep and dreaming rather than waken up and interpret the reality of what they are dreaming and, thus, be destroyed with Mystery, Babylon the great the U.S. is in about 4 years.
"My fellow Americans, on Tuesday, Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad launched a horrible chemical weapons attack on innocent civilians. Using a deadly nerve agent, Assad choked out the life of innocent men, women and children.
It was a slow and brutal death for so many, even beautiful babies were cruelly murdered in this very barbaric attack. No child of God should ever suffer such horror."
http://www.newsweek.com/transcript-dona … sad-580339
Like any forensic investigations , the entire investigative ability of leadership SHOULD be finding out ;
- Was it Serin* gas
- how was it delivered
- who delivered it
- from where did it come
- who manufactured the gas
All fairly easy for those who investigate these incidents to investigate. NATO , The UN , Everyone continues drawing these red lines in the sand and then ignoring the actual infractions of nations or groups of nations , or separate rebel factions ! Many liberal ,anti- war freaks of nature , will have you believe that THAT is just fine .
The question is AT WHAT POINT INSN'T IT OKAY , when it happens in Toronto , Mexico city , Montreal , L.A. ...........
OF COURSE the left has to turn this into a political "wag the dog " that's the limits and extent of their grasp on political intelligence , political memory , world history , middle eastern history , foreign policy , ...........No actually that's the extent of their levels of simple intelligence .
Undeniably , For Trump , The results of this act ---Even though not fully yet time realized , just elevated his level of respect across the world to the level of Ronald Reagan's incredible leadership ability !
Can't wait till someone argues that !
Early assessments by U.S. intelligence officials, Doctors Without Borders and the U.N. health agency suggested that chlorine gas and traces of sarin were used in the bombing,
by Missing Link 5 years ago
Are we (the USA) really going to launch an unprovoked attack upon Syria? Really?Obama said a long time ago if the Syrian regime used chemical weapons in Syria it would cross a line. The last thing Asaad wanted was to have USA involvement. So, it makes no sense...
by Scott Belford 5 years ago
Let's say Israel hadn't bombed the Syrian nuclear program into oblivion decades ago, or the world lets Iran develop nuclear capability and they ship some suitcase nukes to Assad, or North Korea sneaked some in. In any case, what I am posing is what if Assad had tactical nukes. Now,...
by Susie Lehto 21 months ago
More than 50 tomahawk missiles were launched from US Navy destroyers, targeting an airfield near Homs, the report said, citing a US official.More to follow..* http://www.itv.com/news/2017-04-07/repo … near-homs/Tell me it isn't so.
by Deforest 5 years ago
According to my source of information, those children were the ones who were kidnapped by djihadists. Experts are stating that they didn't die from sarin attacks since the symptoms don't correspond. In one word, we armed those dogs that killed those innocent angels. And God bless America right?...
by Thomas Byers 4 years ago
What Do You Think About Chemical Weapons Used In Syria?In the name of religion various factions of the Muslim faith are fighting one another and now they have used chemical weapons. Why do these people keep doing this to their own people. I think the world, not just the USA should step in and take...
by Deforest 5 years ago
It just happened in Syria and guess who did it? The so-called Free Syria Army. Most of the victims were civilians! But what do we care? We are so far!Where do those chemical weapons come from if not from the West? Since radical islamists possess chemical weapons with our blessing why did we make a...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|