Allowing motorists to hit protesters with their vehicle legally if they are blocking roads.
* http://www.charlottestories.com/nc-hous … ock-roads/
People on Twitter sure do like to speak their mind. From what I have read they are hoping all states will pass such a law.
* https://twitter.com/LeviSmithUSA/status … 69/photo/1
The BLM haven't been around blocking roads since Obama left the WH.
I certainly hope that means inching forward until they move and not mowing them down at 60 miles per hour.
I hope so! People with common sense would normally assume that. I have seen videos where some protesters became road bumps though.
Throwing molotov cocktails and pointing guns could change the rules.
Doubt you can push them out of the way. "Due Care" would seem to prohibit that. The intention seems to be that if you are driving and suddenly come upon people intentionally standing in the road you won't be liable.
So happy to read that North Carolina Republicans are now legalizing the right for drivers to kill people exercising their Constitutional right to free expression.
Mowing down protestors is a much better idea than simply calling the police and having them remove the protestors if they are breaking the law or endangering anyone.
Blocking a major thoroughfare does endanger others. I'm not for vehicular manslaughter but the right to free speech does not include denying others the right to go about their business.
I understand your point. If they are breaking the law, the police should arrest and remove them. Driving a car into them is not a safe or rational solution.
But the police don't arrest them. Over the span of hours (by which time you have been damaged financially and;/or socially, they remove them and let them go.
I'm with you - the answer doesn't seem to be mowing down any protesters that can be found, but what IS it then? This notion that "free speech" means interrupting the lives of other people in order to be on TV has gotten way out of hand.
The article you provided seems to say that people accidentally hitting protesters who are blocking the street cannot be civilly liable as in sued for damages. It does not say they can’t be held criminally liable. So, you can’t aim for the protesters.
Twitter is people speaking their minds not the facts.
civil liability. n. potential responsibility for payment of damages or other court-enforcement in a lawsuit, as distinguished from criminal liability, which means open to punishment for a crime.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictiona … +liability
As a long-distance cyclist, I can tell you that 99% of all drivers are safe and responsible. The 1% are not. They literally drive as close as possible to us just to make a point.
But even when they hit someone, they often get away with it because it's so difficult to prove intent.
That won't stop a criminal prosecutor wanting to make an example. I think it would be a little easier to prove intent or imply intent to a jury if a person hits a line of protesters (especially if there are no skid marks on the road) over a person hitting a bicyclist on an open road (hitting one bicyclist hard to prove intent, hitting a flock of bicyclists a little easier).
As a delivery driver I see some of the worst driving everyday. People driving 50 in a school zone, playing dodgem at 70 on the highway. I pass at least 2 accidents everyday. We have to remind people about looking out for motorcycles and the 3 feet rule for passing bikes. Just look at the Amish being killed in their buggies by the people on the road today.
I think it's more like 60% good 30% thoughtless 10% deranged
That might be more accurate. So many with road rage. I won't get in a car if I know someone is porn to road rage. Healthy boundaries help. Its too easy for some drivers to be triggered, I hope they understand this new law isn't a license for their rage.
by ptosis17 months ago
Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) 500X-RE can be heard 2 miles / 2,000 meters away. At 149 decibels the blasts is not only well past the 120-decibel discomfort mark but also above the 130-decibel threshold for potential...
by Jack Lee9 months ago
These are not protesters in the traditional sense. They are anarchist and violent and destructive. They act like mafia thugs and threaten local shop keepers reminescent of the protection racket.Why are these people...
by Susie Lehto14 months ago
Obama's stand-down orders have been changed, now police can deal with the anarchists and anti-Donald Trump protesters from blocking traffic. They took these guys down gently but firmly. Portland Police...
by Petra Vlah6 years ago
America is praising itself as the voice of democratic values – freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and all the other empty slogans that are making the rest of the world laughing and many real Americans...
by lady_love1587 years ago
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/briefs/a … 20buildingI haven't seen much reporting on this! Looks like the left has a penchant for weapons! I wonder what they were planning to do with this? This is an indication...
by Don W6 years ago
Given the Christian message about social justice, what position do you think Jesus would take regarding OWS and the St Paul's protest? And what do you think the Church of England should do? Can't help think that images...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.