Folks, this one brings a flood of cliches' to mind, but if you just think of the one - "... there's nothing new in politics," then the rest will come to you.
This started as a tweet, (or retweet), from pundit Jamie Dupree, headlined;
"From an old newspaper column, echoes of current political arguments"*clickable
"In recent weeks, I’ve been compiling a list of frequent arguments that are being made to me on social media about the troubles of the current administration, thinking I would put together a blog about the daily reaction of President Donald Trump’s supporters, as backers of both parties do battle over the Trump Presidency."
*just click on the image to go to the tweet, then click on the tweet image to get a readable image of Art's column.
Come on - follow the link, it won't be any fun if you don't.
A poignant excerpt from the article, GA
"This old Buchwald column and the ready comparisons to today is not to say that Trump equals Nixon."
Hey here Credence2, I have noticed your sparse participation lately, have the 'Righties' worn you down?
I don't think Pres. Trump compares to Pres. Nixon, in general, but I can see where some comparisons might be offered.
It is nice to be missed, GA, thank you
Family matters required my return to Colorado for a few days, everything is peachy-keen.
But, I am back with a vengeance.
Yes, there are some similarities in the nature of the complaints and comparisons. But, we are in different era than what was the case almost 50 years ago. I remember the 1968 contest between Nixon and Humphrey. While, I preferred Humphrey, Nixon was not a guy totally without a clue in left field. If it weren't for his own demons, he may have well been considered a good President by historians. There were few men who were better prepared for the office at that time. Contrast that with a bumbling political neophyte?
The polarization between the political parties and ideologies behind them are far greater now than it was then. Compared to someone like Donald Trump, I can look back on Nixon with fond nostalgia.
I hope you caught Kathleen's link. I think you will find it an interesting read that you might agree with, (his argument made sense to me).
ps. I stole your Nixon had his "own demons..." thought for a comment to ahorseback - but I did give you author's credit.
It s interesting and funny , I remember Nixon's days , I have to say one thing that does bother me a little is that the media right seems to instantly go on the defense every time a newbie- on -the- job liberal media robot creates another fantasy story line about Trump , My feeling is , to heck with the obstructionist media , all we need is a grass root's movement for us all to turn off all the leftist drivel .
Remember that bumper sticker 'Kill your T.V. " ?
When comparisons arise , we also have to consider the positive sides of Nixon , He got us out of Viet -Nam , began a dialog with China after none was present -forever , brought the brilliance of Henry Kissinger into the world of foreign policy and middle east political strategies , sure Nixon was a white house liar in the end but which one did you say wasn't Bill Clinton ,Jimmy Carter , Barack Obama ...........The left sometimes really loves to conveniently and correctly categorize all the political evil ---with the exception their own .
In the annals of true history the Clinton Dynasty will come to be known as a far , far worse than Nixon's. Richard Nixon's evil cannot hold a candle to political atrocities that this pair of organised criminals conjured up out of a multitude of offences . Here's a real comparison--- Nixon brought down by an act of others in the RNC--------- Clinton -Sanders - brought down by their actual manipulation of the DNC rules , The Clintons and the DNC in fact may be a accomplice's in a murder .
Pick a crime and put the Clinton name on it . In fact ,they brilliantly invented modern political crime
Hello ahorseback, I was pondering how to address your defense of Nixon, (which in detail, I agree with), when credence2's comment gave me the words... "Nixon had his demons."
I would also defend Pres. Nixon's policy leadership, in both foreign and domestic areas, and his legislative leadership actions, but I think any defense must first acknowledge the "demons" of his dark side. The consideration of ethics was not a primary concern for him.
I agree with you , however it is easy to demonize one who actually wasn't in control of THAT part of his downfall .I believe watergate happened without his pre- planning any part of it but I do say, get all the Lawyers out of government . They hold an evil and often separative political ideology . We are a nation of laws and I believe they overuse that in self promotive policies . , ie. the Clintons .
Interesting. This hub came to mind when I read the following article today in Politico:
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/ … ans-215175
Unintended consequences are amazing.
Lately when I think back to nixon and watergate , I am freshly reminded of one more of Hilary Clinton's great accomplishments , To be fired by the watergate investigators for lying or for lying once again or for her first political lie , or was it for her first bout of lying and total incompetence ?
I'm so confused .
by Grace Marguerite Williams14 months ago
PresidentLove or hate Hillary Clinton, she is leading significantly in the polls for Democratic presidential candidate. She has the political smarts & experience to led this country. She also have...
by Mike Russo10 months ago
Trump is not your normal candidate nor is he running a normal campaign. I know the word normal is relative, but in the world of campaigns, it is based on previous campaigns that had some sense of being normal with...
by Denise11 months ago
I'm curious. There is no 'smoking gun' pointing to Russia's involvement in the email hacks of Hillary's campaign but I have a few questions I'd be interested in hearing opinions on.1. What does the Democratic party and...
by Denise18 months ago
The best I can figure the Trump phenomenon, from listening to co-workers and reading comments on line is that the primary thing Trump has to offer is that he isn't Clinton, or Sanders, or Cruz or Rubio. The man has no...
by G. Diane Nelson Trotter6 months ago
Donald Trump is the president of the United States. The odds are in his favor to accomplish many of his objectives because of the trifecta.When his lies can easily be proven, does that impact1) public trust2)...
by ahorseback11 months ago
Just one gathering ,!5,000 people for Trump , turning away another ten thousand !--From the beginning Hilary's have dwindled , She's lucky to have 1,500 !............I suggest Hilary...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.