It's time for a Special Investigation OF THE Special Investigation ?

1. 0

   ahorsebackposted 7 years ago

   Jees ,........ This  Trump obstructionism from the left couldn't show  more ignorance of origin than the naked moral corruption OF the  actual investigators ? From Mueller to his hired , high payed  minions  of Clinton ,Obama donors  to Comey himself.  Time for the charades  to begin ?
   
   Actually , Trump  , just "Executive Order" them right out of the entire investigation !

   replyreport
   1. 59

      Live to Learnposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      I sure hope Trump doesn't take your advice on this issue. Boy, would that put him into a pickle.

      replyreport
   2. 78

      colorfuloneposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Hillary Clinton Told FBI's Mueller To Deliver Uranium To Russians In 2009 "Secret Plane-Side Tarmac Meeting"
      *  http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-1 … ne-side-ta
      
      I had read about this before but as the story goes, it has come to the forefront again.  There's something about all the agains cycling, again.  That's good!

      replyreport
   3. 72

      ptosisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      How would that be a good idea? So far unable to fire his way out of a pickle like a reality show. How many turtles are stacked on top of each other?
      
      If want to end the queries then investigating the investigation would further distract. Is that really how you are able to get the thing you want?

      replyreport
      1. 0

         ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

         How about this , NO EVIDENCE ,     would that constitute anything but a ideologically generated witch hunt ?   All it amounts to is an attempt to  FIND evidence of anything , anything at all . Got any unpaid parking tickets Donald ?
         
         Trump should probably just stand up and say " I may have broke a law but I had no   INTENT   !" per Hilary investigation .
         
         End of investigation !

         replyreport
         1. 72

            ptosisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

            Mmmmmmmmmmm that's the very definition of investigation.  You should welcome it in order to exonerate and remove all doubts of innocence.

            replyreport
            1. 0

               ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

               You mean , like a Fishing Trip ?

               replyreport
               1. 72

                  ptosisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                  Well, yeah, in Trump's case that would be true since Donnie Darko is alway taking the bait & tweeting himself deeper into the Tidy-Bowl Whirlpool. ! buhahaha !  Trump twitters like the blue whale challenge.
                  
                  No, seriously, folks:
                  Russians attempted to influence 2016 but nobody is saying that any illegal influence resulted in order to maintain the illusion of having  a legit election and a legit gov't.
                  
                  Comey says that domestic influence via dirty tricks has always been true in politics. So I guess according to Comey, it is OK for the Mercers to use a Canadian data scraper via Facebook info to launch a personal social-political experiment onto the human race without informed consent.
                  
                  Several former colleagues of Mercer’s said that his views are akin to Objectivism, the philosophy of Ayn Rand. Magerman said, “Bob believes that human beings have no inherent value other than how much money they make."
                  
                  Cambridge Analytica’s parent company is SCL Group, lists Dmitry Firtash as a board member.  Austria had arrested the Ukrainian businessman Firtash at the request of the United States which had been investigating him since 2006.
                  
                  Documents are emerging that implicate Ukrainian oligarch and Poroshenko partner Dmitry Firtash in trying to bribe US Justice Department officials, including FBI Director James Comey into declining prosecution of his person and Arseny Yatsenyuk on corruption charges in the United States. This could be the reason why Special Counsel Mueller hired a DoJ attorney w/experience prosecuting money laundering & East European organized crime.
                  
                  Robert Mercer: The Billionaire Behind Donald Trump |
                  Did Cambridge Analytica influence the Brexit vote and the US election?
                  Robert Mercer & the Dark Money Behind Trump
                  Populism Is A Right-Wing Lie Fronting A Dark Future
                  
                  
                  How important was Mercer to Trump being elected president? He supported U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, before throwing his support to Trump. “All I can take away is that they just want to be power players,” said a former Breitbart  staffer,  “I don’t know what their principles are. I don’t know how you switch from Ted Cruz to Donald Trump so quickly.”
                  
                  http://www.bluedotdaily.com/trumprussia … -imagined/
                  
                  
                  
                  
                  
                  

                  replyreport
                  1. 0

                     ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                     Oh no ,  CONSPIRACY THEORIST'S  are breeding and  they are now calling  themselves , the media !
                     
                     How the left creates so much conspiracy out of Trump and ignores[d] the entire Obama Legacy , is beyond understanding .

                     replyreport
                     1. 72

                        ptosisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                        How RWNJs selective attention and denying reality to justify self important prejudical narrowmindess is quite unbelievable.
                        
                        Hard not to suspect willfull ignorance as trolling who admitted to listening to Breitbart - which in itself is a conspiracist theorist propaganda outlet.

                        replyreport
                        1. 0

                           ahorsebackposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                           Obviously you haven't listened , Nothing new there though ,    They are the only balance out there , I dare you to listen to David Webb , no don't listen  it would embarrass you or your friends , google him .?

                           replyreport
                           1. 72

                              ptosisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                              Remember this interview awhile back when tRump said, ‘As far as hacking, I think it was Russia, but I think we also get hacked by other countries and other people,’”
                              
                                  By the way, if Russia was working so hard on the 2016 Election, it all took place during the Obama Admin. Why didn’t they stop them?     — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 22, 2017
                              
                              Why didn’t the Obama administration do more to sound the alarm over Russia’s meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign?
                              
                              Lisa Monaco, President Obama’s top homeland security and counterterrorism adviser, describes a White House afraid of “doing the Russians’ work for them.” By going public before the election with evidence that the Kremlin was trying to help Donald Trump , the Obama team feared it would be accused of intervening to help Hillary Clinton.  - http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/ … ump-214976
                              
                              In Obama  last days, some White House officials scrambled to spread information about Russian efforts to undermine the presidential election — and about possible contacts between associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump and Russians — across the government. Former American officials say they had two aims: to ensure that such meddling isn’t duplicated in future American or European elections, and to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators. - https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/us/p … cking.html
                              
                              Appomattox.-     Johnson details a largely failed effort to get elections system designated as critical government infrastructure -- which would have given greater priority to states seeking help in possible cyberattacks. But the proposal faced a severe backlash, with some state officials alleging that Johnson was attempting a federal takeover of state-based elections systems.
                              
                              "Why wasn't that done? Was there thought given to that? Why was that course rejected?" asked Rep. Adam Schiff. Johnson said that Obama clearly wanted that message out there, but did not want to make it look like he was putting his thumb on the scale for (Democratic presidential nominee) Hillary Clinton. "We considered all those things and the decision was made that the Director of National Intelligence (James Clapper) and Department of Homeland Security together should make this statement," Johnson said.
                              
                              I don't think - so just wanted to go ahead with the fake election that is not legit. One way civil society grants legitimacy to governments is through public elections. Trump has stated several times about 'rigged elections'. It's an open secret.
                              
                              

                              replyreport
2. 78

   colorfuloneposted 7 years ago

   As President, Trump would have the authority to do just that.  Might as well get to the truth though.  I want to see Lynch interrogated under oath and several others.

   replyreport
3. 0

   ahorsebackposted 7 years ago

   FBI , Special Council Investigation to date ;
   Facts .
   
   One , The Russian hacking   in the elections began with attacking the DNC incompetence.
   Two,  it continued and thrived with internally driven DNC leaking
   Three , Obama -Clinton stop it ?  They THOUGHT it would help  more than hurt.
   Four , NSA offered DNC help , DECLINED  for privacy protections .
   Five , There has not been a RNC , Trump connection to Russian  election interference whatsoever .
   Six , All Russian interference has not effected one actual vote or voting machine
   
   No matter how the left  spins it .

   replyreport
   1. 72

      ptosisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      That's a good post. but really, "All Russian interference has not effected one actual vote or voting machine " - That's a broad statement which again appears to be emanating omnipresence from your viewpoint. Each individual voter's mindset has not as of yet been uploaded to 'the cloud' aka The Matrix.
      
      Regarding the DNC email leak, that the Russians did, that certainly hacked the minds of voters. Russia-linked social media bots played a big role in online conversation about the election.  For all I know you could be a Russian bot, and all this time I was talking to nobody.
      
      All of us are the target for disinformation. The use of social media bots to spread fake news was part of a larger disinformation campaign to help Trump get elected.  You are either a bot or the result of right-wing media network anchored around Breitbart developed as a distinct and insulated media system, using social media as a backbone to transmit a hyper-partisan perspective to the world. - https://www.cjr.org/analysis/breitbart- … -study.php
      
      Although a very important point is Disclosure of embarrassing information should not be confused with disinformation. I.E. Podesta, and the DNC screwing of Bernie. I have no love for the DNC so I get pissed off when you insult me as if I were. I'm a progressive, not a liberal. When I call you a RWNJ it is in retaliation.
      
      You have admitted freely  that you listen to  Breitbart, so as a product of indoctrination,  you distrust all other information.  It has been drilled into your mind  - or you are a program.
      
      Programmed or a program doesn't make much difference to me.
      
      

      replyreport
   2. 72

      ptosisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      This is not a left, right, up, down thing. Not talking quantum physics here. Not talking opinion. Just the facts Ma'am.
      
      #1  Establish personal contact: Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort & Carter Page — and using them as a means to further Russia's foreign-policy goals.
      
      #2 Hacking DNC and the give info to WikiLeaks, which leaked in batches throughout the second half of 2016.
      
      #3 Amplify the propaganda value of the leaked emails with a disinformation campaign waged predominantly on Facebook and Twitter, in an effort to use automated bots to spread fake news and pro-Trump agitprop.
      
      #4 Breached US voting systems in as many as 39 states, steal registration data that can be used to target and manipulate voters in future elections.

      replyreport
4. 0

   ahorsebackposted 7 years ago

   Back to your #'s
   One -you forgot -Russians buying  the Clinton's  , Podesta , Uranium One
   Two-The Russian DNC "hacking " was really  DNC leaking
   Three- That was a DNC conspiracy and where was all done under Obama oversight  ?
   Four -Fact -To Date No voting tallies were affected, but what country outside doesn]t wish or opine to sway out elections ?
   
   Careful , You're  usually fairly  fair Ptosis , but you're falling for leftist conspiracies --fact dodging , where was the Obama administration oversight of our elections actual integrity   ,under his watch  He allowed the DNC  fiasco , the election collusion  with outside influences  of the DNC , the media collusion's with DNC cheating ,   he also allowed the Clinton  State dept.  being "bought " by the Russians ,the  Saudi's ,  and every other Clinton Foundation payee .

   replyreport
   1. 72

      ptosisposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Back to your #'s
      {What about-ism} - One -you forgot -Russians buying  the Clinton's  , Podesta , Uranium One
      
      {No, a leak is someone leaking, this was a hack}Two-The Russian DNC "hacking " was really  DNC leaking
      
      {Kettle calling the pot black}ouThree- That was a DNC conspiracy
      
      {How do you KNOW this?} Four -Fact -To Date No voting tallies were affected,
      
      {Projecting!} -fact dodging

      replyreport