The most powerful gun lobby in the country, which fiercely opposes any gun legislation, is now saying it is willing to regulate the bump stocks used in the Vegas massacre.
I'm curious if the people posting on HP forums against gun laws agree or disagree with the NRA.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpos … story.html
It is high time that this NRA begins to finally listen to reason.
Next step is figuring out how to "regulate" making them in your garage, on a $300 machine that is widely available. Suggestions?
I can't change the way people think, 'homicide'. But like every other legally defined crime, if you are caught at any stage ofmanufacfure, distribution..... There is that word again, deterrent. A deterrent is always better than nothing in a world where you cannot spot every speeding driver, all the time.
I think its good they are willing to sit down at the table to talk. Why not.
Yes and no. I fully support making them illegal; given that they are easily made on any 3-D printer I don't think it will do any good. Pandora's box has been opened, and shutting it isn't as easy as passing a law that we cannot enforce.
Wilderness, I agree with you. Banning them will only make certain criminal elements have them. Especially since they can be made by a 3-D printer...we're only going to see more of them. Again, laws will only be followed by the law abiding...criminal elements are never impacted by laws. That's reality.
You guys are amazing, you would have the same excuse if we were talking about, say, your right to possess tactical nuclear weapons as opposed to yourneighbor. Murder has been unstopable in the human experience but does making it legal and having no penalties in its regard going to help? All of you always can be so much more definitive drawing parameters around the abortion issue and a woman's options. Why is this issue finding only the same meely mouth conservative responses.?
You mean "meely mouth conservative responses" like "I fully support making them illegal"? It's what I said, after all.
Or does "mealy mouth" mean saying that I don't think laws will help because they're too easy to make at home? We should all follow the liberal method of closing our eyes and ears to reality in the hopes that utopia will occur or we're "mealy mouthed"? We should all pretend that if people that would only use them for fun don't have one it means killers won't whip one out in a few minutes on that nifty gadget they just bought?
The ability of the liberal mind to live in a make believe world is absolutely amazing, as is their demand that everyone else join them in their fantasy.
I have asked you before, wilderness, is there ever a line between a legally possessed firearm and military ordinance for you and the conservative mindset? Why not say the same on the same line about anything and everything? Are there any limits? You said that it is legally possible to own a machine gun. I was thinking that that permit, if granted, would be rare at best. Oh, I just want one? Yes, I want a Granade launcher with live grenades, too, maybe a working anti-aircraft gun in the backyard Even YOU said that this accessory circumvent the restriction on possession of fully automatic weapons, yet you have no problems allowing for their proliferation like so many lillies in the field?
Liberals may talk about utopia, but conservatives takes stands making the Flintstones appear forward relative to the needs of a modern society.
With this rant I can only repeat, for the third time: "I fully support making them illegal".
Unlike you, however, I live in the real world where it takes minutes for a normal homeowner to print one out, and I'd like to see how we're going to fix that problem as well. You bury your head in the sand if you wish; I'd like actual solutions rather than pretend ones.
Question ... Can a person be accurate using a scope on a rifle fitted with a bump fire at that range and height from the 32nd floor? I have never used a bump myself but am wondering if it would be a recipe for a black eye.
Why do you suppose Obama's ATF in 2010 decided not to regulate these devices?
Perhaps like the NRA, they didn't know the capabilities of a bump stock. Some admitted as much. The easier thing to do is outlaw any magazines over 20 rounds or so. You cannot copy a large capacity clip with a 3D printer. Yes, you may be able to get them on the black market but the cost would be prohibitive for most "legal" gun owners, and then they could not claim they are law abiding citizens after all.
"Yes, you may be able to get them on the black market but the cost would be prohibitive for most "legal" gun owners"
Given that very few murders are accomplished using "legal" guns, and "illegal" owners will large magazines from the black market, why bother to ban them?
But beyond that, Randy, you don't need a bump stock. Bet you didn't know about this:
http://concealednation.org/2017/10/full … t-on-fire/
Worth a listen to both libs and conservatives!
You lose that wager, Dan. I already knew about this technique. Me being a leftist you wouldn't think I knew anything technical about firearms, but I can field strip a weapon faster than you can I'd wager. In my younger years I was considered a marksman with a rifle or any other firearm. I've only harvested one deer using a scope and felt bad about it although it was a difficult shot. My deer rifle of choice is a hundred year old Mosin Nagant, the same rifle the famous Russian sniper used in the Battle of Stalingrad.
I'm just telling you all this because I want you to know I respect the use of firearms for the right purpose, not simply because someone wants one.
Hmm. Sounds like you didn't watch the video. If not, you should - it really is worth the 5 minutes of time. It would be worth double that if it were longer, and I seldom watch Utube videos.
And you DID watch it, and already knew the technique, then I don't believe a word of your hunting and gun stories!
I could be wrong, but I don't think the ATF has the legal authority to regulate specific weapons or devices on its own. It has to come from laws made by Congress.
But your overall point is well taken. The responsibility for the existence of bump stocks belongs to plenty of different people, organizations and politicians.
Wayne LaPierre has said for years that we should take a look at bump stocks, and look at regulating them.
ColorfulOne, it seems like they all talk a lot but don't ever take much action.
That video is an eye opener. I didn't know that that was possible.
by My Esoteric19 months ago
The NRA leadership (not most of NRA members) currently sees Gun Control as a stark Black and White issue. The NRA et al think that ANY step to keep guns out of the hands of those who shouldn't have them is ipso...
by Stacie L2 years ago
According to a Mic analysis of political spending data collected by the Center for Responsive Politics, the NRA, —often cited as the most influential lobbying organization in the country — has spent a total of...
by zzron7 years ago
As a legal citizen of America, how do you feel about guns?
by LucidDreams4 years ago
Why fear the NRA? There is no need. They are like the bully who will cry if you actually fight back. If the NRA wants to continue to have some say in this political world, they need to straighten up and start offering...
by Michele Travis4 years ago
Some people already have a lot of guns. So if gun laws are passed, how will the government actually get guns away from people. Some guns are registered and some are not, how could the government find out,...
by Mike Russo9 days ago
Ask the 59 people who were killed and the 525 people who were wounded and all of those who were traumatized by this horrific event, if we need gun control. Why does any civilian need access to assault weapons? The...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.