jump to last post 1-13 of 13 discussions (13 posts)


  1. bill yon profile image73
    bill yonposted 8 years ago


  2. JC Grif profile image58
    JC Grifposted 8 years ago

    If I could travel in a time machine back to the forming of this country, I would beg the founders to do 2 things: include term limits for Congress and the Supreme Court.

  3. J_T profile image53
    J_Tposted 8 years ago

    Life election for anything in a "democratic" country really makes no sense.
    The whole point of America is that no one regime has omnipotent rule and that is exactly what has been constituted. If a judge is 80 years old how can he or she adapt to the changing times with any accuracy?
    This isn't to say every old person can't change, but it is alot harder when you have been doing the same thing for 40 years.

    Also I don't think younger people should be judges, there should be an over 30 age limit, but there should be re-election so that judges cannot get too comfortable in their positions and forget about what the people really need.

  4. profile image44
    cybernistposted 8 years ago

    nope, they should have max term of 7 yrs.

  5. RascalBrat profile image59
    RascalBratposted 8 years ago

    I do not think they should be elected for life,  When they are elected for life they do not vote with the will of the people.  Give us back America as it was written in the Constition, give us back the respect for our Flag like we had year ago.  In our Schools, Court House, Post Office.  I am tired of a few taking this right away.

  6. princeofthenight profile image54
    princeofthenightposted 8 years ago

    We are seeing an example going on right now with the senate hearing prior to approval of our next court justice.  There are obvious discrepancies in this nominees background but the democrats have the numbers to get her in baring a complete breakdown like something we would see in a Perry Mason episode.  So my answer is no, it should not be a life time position simply because someone can get appointed based on nothing but the number game of politics.  if they do a good job then they should have no problem keeping their post from election to election.  As it is now they are answerable to nobody once they are appointed and we say no one is above the law.

  7. Ralph Deeds profile image60
    Ralph Deedsposted 8 years ago

    I would support a maximum age of 75. Justice Stevens is 89 and could drop dead or be afflicted by dementia at any time, if he's not already. Souter provided a good example by retiring at the top of his game and when there is a president in office who is likely to appoint a moderate replacement with similar views to his (Souter's) own. He could as easily have retire last year and let Bush appoint another conservative like Alito or Roberts. Instead, he wisely waited to allow Obama to appoint his replacement.

  8. amillar profile image83
    amillarposted 8 years ago

    A dog is for life.  However, judges could be elected - rather than appointed. 

    I can't see it happening in the UK for a while.

  9. Maria Appleby profile image54
    Maria Applebyposted 8 years ago

    I feel there should be term limits for the Supreme Court and Congress, in fact, all political offices. Should all offices have term limits, and more frequent elections "by the people" - I feel those in office can be held to account much better; their behavior and actions less influenced by "special interests" and more influenced by "the will of the people".  Just a thought.

  10. BlogggerOne profile image57
    BlogggerOneposted 7 years ago

    No.  No one should be voted into office for life.  It's silly.  Life is constantly changing and so are the judges.

  11. drdspervez profile image68
    drdspervezposted 7 years ago

    No ! I think supreme court Judges should be elected for a tenure of three years.


  12. someonewhoknows profile image74
    someonewhoknowsposted 7 years ago

    First of all - Supreme court justices are not elected by the people.They are appointed by presidents and approved by our representitives.

    Second,I think all public officials should go through a psychriatric examination for sanity and when their sanity is in question.President,vice president and congress.

    Third,the supreme court should have a clear understanding  of what the founding fathers intended when they created the constitution.It has been said that the constitution was  intended only for a moral and ethical people and it was not intended for any others.

  13. perfectperception profile image61
    perfectperceptionposted 7 years ago

    Not really. There should be a cutoff point