The US runs what is referred to as a presidential political system, where Canada runs a parliamentary system. This distinction refers to the differing relationships between executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.
For example, executive legitimacy in the US is preserved through a series of checks and balances, whereas in Canada, we have cabinet solidarity, which means that the members of the Prime Minister's cabinet must always follow his decisions, and not to diverge.
The American President is elected in fixed terms and can veto a bill, where in Canada we elect a party and are given a leader from within that party. Our Prime Minister does not have a set term, because he has the power to dissolve parliament, but alone, he does not have the same veto as a president.
For the most part, the difference are fairly subtle. We could argue that parliamentary systems might be able to pass legislation quicker than presidential systems, which would be beneficial in an emergency situation. It might also be fair to say that the American system is very secure, through a strict measure of checks and balances.
There's alot more we could say about this, but these are a few key differences between the two without going into a full-blown history lesson.
by Mark Lees4 years ago
Do you feel current party political systems are truly democratic?Party political systems are dominant in nearly all western democracies but does the limit of choosing from a small selection of parties represent true...
by Zonah3 years ago
Why are political systems designed?
by Credence24 years ago
No offense to those that call the "Volunteer State" home, but this is truly an outrage. Wasn't it in Tennessee where adherents to Islam were hassled when they wanted to buid a mosque? Are we still...
by Zonah3 years ago
Are political systems devised to tether nations or create disparity among them?
by crankalicious7 hours ago
Seriously, is this something anyone cares about?This was something President Trump engaged in before he was President, so it shouldn't factor into anything other than another indictment of his character.Remember, he...
by fishskinfreak20088 years ago
Web-site/URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/201003 … ost/490080Who cares? PALIN HAS NO CREDIBILITY NOW
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.