Does a New World Order have to be so bad?
Could we have a decentralized, democratic, but united world---without the bankers being in charge?
guess it really depends on who ends up running it and setting the rules. these are things the Dreamers never dream about. who runs the world if we go that route. Muslims, Red China, The UN, where more than half the Countrys are run by Dictators who dont believe in say. Free speech or freedom of Religion, where the rule of law is what the dictator decides it is.
considering the shape most countrys are in, do you really think it would be so good. this is life not a hollywood script.
No - all people are motivated by their own agendas and, often, their own blatant self-interest. Why should leaders be any different...and who exactly would lead, because someone has to provide this? Capitalism, as erroneous as it can be, provides the best system so far to at least ensure that *some* countries in the world experience democracy. Of course, remembering that those countries (i.e. USA) have then gone on to choose very un-democratic leaders because of the huge tidal wave of intellectual laziness that pervades modern culture. The world is run by mass-media and corporate interests - but at least people living in the West can use the freedom that the Capitalistic model ensures to promote a peaceful global agenda; as many think-tanks in the West have done, to promote the irrationality and lack-of-logic that persists in a Dictatorship model of order.
Basically, dictators are bad for business.
To the initial question...
I think we could... maybe. But getting there wouldn't be easy (I for one would fight it all the way), and retaining that type of government, especially on a world wide scale, over the long term doesn't seem very likely. As Always Greener said, people are often motivated by their own self-interests. I'd take that statement a bit further, in that people are always motivated by self-interest, but that human trait is sometimes more subtle, under the range of most peoples perceptions.
That's why I believe in capitalism, personally, in accomadates mans nature better than other economic systems seem to.
by Scott Belford 2 weeks ago
A comment I just read says it succinctly"By drawing down US forces in Syria to zero and Afghanistan to half, he has exposed his paltry grasp on what actually keeps Americans, their interests, and global stability on an even keel." - Nic Robertson
by Mike Russo 4 years ago
Is there a new world order?Iraq wants to be split into three different countries: Kurds, Shiia, and Sunni. Syria also wants to be divided. Israel wants to takeover Palestine. Palestine wants to become it's own country. The Eastern part of the Ukraine wants to be returned to Russia. Egypt...
by ChapmanHester 9 years ago
What is this world comming to that we would allow even under the pretense of protecting people in the event of some catastrophic event to be detained in such prisons? If we look not only at the aspects of REX 84 and the DePopulation goals of the governing forces, we will still see plans of...
by Gary Anderson 9 years ago
The new world order is the economic control of the world by international bankers. It is a one world economic system that has abused the middle classes through liar loans and scam rules from Basil 2 that allowed banks to hide toxic assets OFF balance sheet. This international banker class has now...
by Michele Travis 6 years ago
Do you believe that the Illuminati and The New World Order are real? Are they dangerous?What do you think would happen to our country if the Illuminati and the New World Order are real?
by A James Di Rodi 5 years ago
Is a one world order a solution to world peace?I DON'T AGREE WITH IT , BUT WHAT IS YOUR OPINION ON THE MATTER?
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|