Is the Tea Party movement good or bad for the Republicans in this election cycle?
I think the prevailing sense of it is that they are bad for the GOP, because they give voters a choice between two conservatives, which will split the conservative votes and cause a Democrat to win. My own belief is that it will not.
Incumbents of both parties should be worried about re-election, but especially Democrats. Tea Party candidates who have run for the Republican nomination have been surprisingly successful, and conservative voters will vote for them at least as likely as they will for Democrats. The notion that a Tea Party is a fringe movement cannot win a general election is simply mistaken. Whether these protest candidates can become effective legislators and executives is another matter.
I think the Tea Party movement will prove to be ultimately bad for the Republican Party. This movement, I don't think, will have any significantly homogenizing effect on both parties. I'm not sure, but considered historically, those movements which have been positive for this or that party has had a large effect on both parties, and the culture (as well as emanating from that culture).
We might think about the Progressive Movement of the early twentieth century. That movement had an effect on both the Republicans and Democrats, forcing both to become more "progressive" (small p). It was a good government, reformist movement. I would identify movements like neoliberalism and neoconservatism as homogenizing movements, which have benefitted the party (speaking in pure political and cultural terms) that seems to have originated it; but make no mistake, their success came from their ability to shift the entire American culture.
I may be missing something, but from where I sit I don't see the Tea Party as that kind of force. It is only, seemingly, conservatizing (I just invented the word 'conservatizing') the Republican and Libertarian parties and conservatives whose sympathies already lie in that direction.
The Tea Parties aren't so much a "movement" as a spontaneous reaction to the Hi-Handed hard left turn Obama took the country into. Nationalizing automobile manufacturers, the health-care insurance industry, banks and a host of other industries isn't ever a step "towards" liberty and freedom. Creating a Ruling Class Elite with two-dozen-plus unelected "Czars" who do not answer to Congress, yet wield Federal Power & Authority, smacks of Tyranny, not Democracy. Spending trillions of dollars on needless pork, which our Great Grandchildren will still be paying for, is hardly what anyone can call Fiscal Responsibility.
The Tea (Taxed Enough Already) Party is a grass-roots response to the swift adoption of all those Socialist aimed agendas. We have NO desire to see our beloved nation go the way of Greece.
If the old "country club" Republican political machine wants to cling to its dinosaur " moderate/centrist" model, and promote losing candidates like McCain again, they will find themselves out of a job in very little time.
The Tea Party is soon to be the new face of the Conservative Republican Party. This current election cycle is just the beginning. We are sending dozens of Tea Party endorsed candidates to DC this November. I fully expect a Tea Party endorsed President, come 2012.
No it will hurt them because the Tea Party candidates that won primaries are far right and you need moderates to win a general election.
Have a good day.
In certain markets/states they have potentially been a bit of a drag (most notably Delaware). However, all of the enthusiasm and drive in the party is coming from the Tea Party and the Republicans will owe all of their success to the Tea Party.
The catch with Delaware is this, O'Donnell is more in line with Conservative views, but sometimes you need the numbers for control of the senate. Jim Demint probably wouldnt win in Delaware, sometimes you have to take what you can get and follow the sage advice of "nominating the most conservative person..... WHO CAN WIN".
There is potentially some of each the way I see it. From a positive perspective, the Tea Party movement has done much to stimulate the conservative base...far more than the Republican Party has ever been able to do in exciting people to action at the polls. That is a good thing for America in all respects if we are to maintain this country in the same genre in which it was formed. On the negative side, one can argue that the pie is only so large thus, the more people who show up, the more ways the pie must be split. In this situation, the Tea Party movement is conservative dominant of populated by many who would otherwise describe themselves as Republicans. With that in mind, in those elections where there are Republicans running alongside Tea Party candidates and Dems/Liberals, it is highly possible that the conservative vote could get split in such a way as to allow the liberal candidate to gain the office. WB
by Ralph Deeds 9 years ago
This week in Michigan enough Tea Party delegates showed up at a Republican meeting to elect delegates to the party's nominating convention for the election in November to defeat the current Republican party chairman's bid to be elected a delegate. This strikes me as a cataclysmic event for the...
by LOT2DO 9 years ago
What is the Tea Party movement all about?
by SparklingJewel 9 years ago
I was motivated to write this article after reading the following two articles:Is The Tea Party Simply A Symbol Of Public Anger Or Is It The Future of the GOP? (Sodahead)http://twurl.cc/21xrwhich was inspired byThe Tea Party Teens (New York Times) http://twurl.cc/21xs Both of these...
by Jack Lee 2 years ago
Look who is protesting the election results. Would the right do the same if Hillary had won?The answer is obviously NO. Now we see who are the real intolerant, the bigots and the deplorables...It is ironic how the left talks about inclusive except when they are doing the chosing...As a spectator of...
by EPman 8 years ago
Would the same outrage still exist? Or did Obama's presidency ignite the flame?I tend to think that Obama being elected certainly was fuel on the fire -- that is to say, the Tea Party would not be as big or popular if John McCain was president. Much more people would be too complacent simply...
by rhamson 9 years ago
Whether it is perceived as a arm of the right wing or an angry leaderless mob, can the Tea Partiers gather a solid base and agenda to adequately achieve any change or is the damage already done to defeat its' purpose?
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|