Do you think that incarceration rehabilitates criminals, and if not how would you solve the problem?
Criminals seem to harden in prisons, rather than rehabilitate. How does society be protected and give ciminals a chance of making amends?
There are three theories at work in our system.
1.rehabilitation which works in some cases but probably not a majority.
2 punishment which is based on that one commits a crime they should pay a price.
3 Get them off the streets, which is the most practical, in my opinion,
These three theories tend to conflict and cause confusion in the overall system. I personally favor rehabilitation where it is realistic and otherwise remove them fom the general population for the sake of public safety.
I think we first have to stop and remember that incarceration was never really designed into the justice system as a means or rehabilitation. That came as an afterthought. The primary reasoning behind incarceration was deterrence. There are many who point to the system and say that it has failed because it lacks rehabilitation. Stop and think about it for a bit, we have a police force on the street which is placed there primarily as a deterrent to breaking the law. If the law is broken, then they attempt to enforce the law by apprehending to perpetrator. Still, even with police presence, there continues to be crime. If we use the same rationale that we apply to prisons, then we could also conclude that police forces are a failed concept when in actuality, it is the best alternative that we currently have to fight crime. When a person commits a crime, they risk losing their freedom. They take that gamble. Rehabilitation cannot be forced on an individual no more than you can make someone quit smoking or drinking. The individual must have a mindset to seek the rehabilitation and to implement it into his life. Unfortunately, too many criminals are not of that mindset. WB
Criminals are just as capable to live and learn. God gave us all free will and some need to be taught how to use it. The best measure I believe our society could take, would be to catch the behaviors young and have the necessary measures obtainable for any income level. Counseling at young ages could guide even the most disturbed mind into the right direction, I've seen it before my own eyes. For those whom this wouldn't apply to, they would need serious help in and out of the walls. Those same people would have to use their god given will to live intentionally honest for them to recieve adequate help.
I think it depends on the nature of the crime committed, For hard core violent offenders you could probably flip a coin to determine the extent of rehabilitation which may occur as a result of incarceration.
On the other hand, with regard to some non violent less severe cases I think just the thought of or actually spending some time behind bars might be enough of a wake up call to deter future infractions of the law.
Great Question by the way.
Incarceration alone does not rehabilitate criminals. The lose of freedom serves as a deterrent to some, so much so that they walk the straight and narrow upon release.
we don't incarcerate to rehabilitate. We incarcerate to remove them from our society.
They are the problem and they need to be eliminated; either keep them locked up or permanently do away with them.
by CWanamaker 7 years ago
When it comes to criminals, do you believe in punishment or rehabilitation?
by Scarface1300 7 years ago
Do you think that prison should be used for punishment or reabilitation?
by torril 4 years ago
once someone has committed a crime, should society add to the problem by making it hard to get a jobto decide what society expects offenders to do once they have served their time and no one will employ them because of there criminal record, should a person be given a second chance to be able to...
by Dave Manors 6 years ago
Should prison inmates be allowed to vote in elections?Criminals in jail are there because they choose to operate outside the limitations that society has designed in law. Is it right that we give those same criminals a say in how those rules are made and how society is run?
by Jonesy0311 7 years ago
Is there a better option for non-violent criminals than incarceration?America currently houses 25% of the world's prison population. Around 63% of these prisoners are non-violent offenders (such as for drug possession). Currently, recividism rates after imprisonment are at 67.5% and prison terms...
by vamenasco 6 years ago
Recidivism: Are Parolees really given a Fair Chance or Does Society close its Doors for Success?It is safe to say Recidivism rates are increasing each year in some states- particularly those in the South, than in other states. Almost always, when an employer sees a potential candidate does not have...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|