I suppose that the answer lies in how we would define "success". If America could somehow persuade the Afghanis to liberalize their attitudes toward other religions besides Islam, treat their women with dignity and respect, educate their girls as well as their boys, cultivate other agricultural crops instead of opium poppies, maintain a society that respects the rule of law, etc., then we might be able to say that the war ended successfully for us. The Afghanis could then be a potential bulwark against terrorism. Most of Afghanistan, however, is stuck in a time warp of centuries gone by and, quite frankly, I don't see how at this moment that America can accomplish such a miracle.
Unfortunately, there is no success in sight given the fact that Afghanistan cannot be ruled by any legitimate government because the country is beholden to fundamentalist religious belief and guns and bombs.
I think the short answer if that Afghanistan has all the ruggedness, mountains, and caves to support hidden operations of terrorist training camps, weapons stashes, etc. Until we can successfully deprive the terrorists of those strongholds, I don't see a way that we can leave short of giving up. If we do, we will find ourselves going back to finish the job which has grown to an even greater task. I cannot envision a time when Afghanis will be able to conduct this mission on their own and do it successfully. WB
I think the answer seems to impossible but to end the war on Afghanistan they have to be diplomat first. there government rules by their religious beliefs and their courage came from their guns and bombs.
Since the center of gravity has moved to the mountainous Pakistani hideouts, the war for Afghanistan has already been lost. We're hacking at leaves on a tree in order to kill the tree.
The US Army is not and never has been trained or task organized to execute counter-insurgency operations successfully. We need constant intel from an Afghan population that won't give it to us. Why?--Because the Taliban will kill them if they do. Check mate.
Our troops must be trained to speak the language and must start acclimatizing to the local people. The local national interpreters imbedded with US troops are all spies. The army has its head too far up its own ass to know who we can and can't trust. They let interpreters take monthly furloughs to get debriefed by the Taliban. Excuse me, but trying to win a war without intel and without Afghan cooperation is like trying to swim the English Channel without knowing how to swim. Our last option available is to swallow our pride and negotiate with and/or pay off the warlords in charge (or else get out). If we get out, Afghanistan will fall back under Taliban rule and Karzai will get his job back at Unocal. Big deal. It's not as if this comedy of errors hasn't happened before in different parts of the globe. The day the US government learns from past mistakes and the day Americans actually remember these past mistakes, I'll eat my hat.
by scoop 6 years ago
What are your thoughts about the War In Afghanistan?Do you think it is time for all foreign troops to leave the country?
by Flightkeeper 8 years ago
How did Obama lose the war in Afghanistan?
by Dave McClure 9 years ago
------------------------------------------------------------KABUL, Afghanistan - President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan said yesterday that he is in full agreement with President Obama's newly announced strategy for the country, saying it was "exactly what the Afghan people were hoping...
by Chupp22 7 years ago
Should we still be pursuing the war in Afghanistan even after we killed Osama Bin Laden?Among the "many" reasons we are fighting this war in Afghanistan, was Terrorism. Well we have killed hundreds of their terrorist leaders already. Will we ever be done with this war or why do you think...
by TimTurner 9 years ago
Most of you know I am very critical of Obama but it looks like he is going to send about 20,000 to 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan which is what needs to be done. At least, that is the rumor on the street.For all of you who support Obama, I'm assuming you will be against this...
by ptosis 21 months ago
Is this what Trump voters wanted?Trumpeteers wanted disruption, "drain the swamp," vanquish ISIS, and above all, bring back jobs. But he's talking about "low-life leakers" instead of renegotiating NAFTA; Says the free press is "the enemy of the American People" instead...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|