Should "in God we trust" be on our money, or does this violate atheists' rights?
Michael Newdow, and lawyer and doctor who is an atheist, has been working for many years to get the words "in God we trust" off money, and the words "one nation under God" out of the pledge of allegiance. He says this violates the constitutional assurance against any establishment of religion by the government. Although I am not an atheist myself, I tend to agree with him. It doesn't seem right or fair to have our money say, "in God we trust", when "we" means the American people. Atheists do not trust God. Are they, therefore, less American? Are they not part of "we"?
Seeing as that was the motto of our forefathers when they founded this country. I say to the Atheists deal with it. I'm getting tired of losing all the stuff I believe in or like because of a hand full of people that don't like it, and just want to see their name in lights, or as most say have there 15 min of fame.
I could care less if it does violate the so-called rights of atheists. Where the hell were they when we found the country on Christian beliefs? Why do they all of a sudden have a right to show up and decide that America is offensive to them. Who will it be next...the Muslims, the Jews. As a country, we damn well better understand our origins and our history and we damn well better quite attempting to change it so that we don't offend the next bunch who wanders in and wants to partake of the milk and honey of America. It is good enough that we allow folks to live here and celebrate their heritage but in the end, we are a Christian Nation founded on Christian principles...let's not lose sight of what makes up our centerline as a nation or we might just be relegated to wandering around with no direction...God! And...just one last question, where is it that we find a list of atheist rights in the Constitution of this country? WB
Although I think it's stupid that we print this ridiculous 60-year- old motto on our money and strike it onto our coins, I don't think we should take it off just beause some people are offended by it. With 300 million people, someone will always be offended by something these days. The only way people will stop being a bunch of whiney babies who want special consideration for themselves will be when we the people start telling others to shut up about themselves. Political correctness is the dumbest and most selfish concept ever conceived by man. "God" is a universal term used by Christians, Jews, Muslims, or even spiritual people with no defined religion. That motto could mean anything. I'm a liberal and a virtual atheist and see nothing wrong with the motto being on our money.
Though I understand the spirit of you statement, I would keep in mind that Muslims use the term Allah, Hindus usually use Visnu or Krishna, other traditions do have differnt names for the creator, I think it is something to consider as times change.
Legally, it does violate the constitution, but I'm an atheist and it doesn't really bother me.
@Wayne Brown: They were about half the people in the room when the Declaration of Independence was signed and the First Amendment to the Constitution was ratified.
Wayne, You're wrong. This nation is not a Christian nation. It is secular. This is why state and church is separated.
The reason "In God We Trust" is on the dollar has nothing to do with the rights of Atheists. The reason it is there is because the Federal Reserve put it there. It is not a federal entity so therefore, they can put whatever they want on their money.
This country was founded on Christian beliefs, why would we throw out our heritage - it's unAmerican
wow... um, it it a motto. it is a historical motto. God could mean anything you hold as a value or a belief...so what is wrong with that... and with all the problems we are facing right now, is this that important? maybe one should try using some other countries' currency since ours is devalued... maybe that is what we should be more concerned about.... hum?
I think that because this country claims to have separation of church and state the words should be removed. I hope China trusts God because the U.S. owes them a lot of money.
China and U.S. Debt
The largest portion of U.S. debt, 68 cents for every dollar or about $10 trillion, is owned by individual investors, corporations, state and local governments and, yes, even foreign governments such as China that hold Treasury bills, notes and bonds.
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/moneymatt … na-Own.htm
by M. T. Dremer 2 years ago
Does the use of "In God We Trust" on our currency violate the separation of church and state?"In God We Trust" wasn't always on U.S. currency. I believe it was put on coins in the 1860s and then later on paper money in the 1950s. From what I understand, court cases have already...
by kathleenkat 6 years ago
Context reference:http://money.msn.com/business-news/arti … =ansmony11I am curious as to what my fellow Hubbers think of Chick-Fil-A.I personally believe that as our country is founded on the principles of FREEDOM (of religion, of speech, of choice, etc.) that Chick-Fil-A is well within...
by T 5 years ago
Does President Obama actions violate the oath he took to uphold the United States Constitution?A federal appeals court panel ruled Friday that violated the Constitution in making recess appointments. They said that Obama did not have the power to make three recess appointments last year to...
by Pandoras Box 8 years ago
What do you think? I'm not gonna argue it, though I may come in later and post my opinion, but I wondered if many people here would agree with that term as an apt description of our country. Additionally she says“Lest anyone try to convince you that God should be separated from the state, our...
by Susan Reid 4 years ago
Since when is America a "Christian" country? I challenge anyone to find a single mention of Jesus Christ in any of our founding documents."God" does not equal "Christ." I swear to God, yes. I swear to Jesus His son? No.One nation under God, ok. One nation under the...
by Xenonlit 6 years ago
Did the USADA violate Lance Armstrong's civil and constitutional rights to a fair trial? If so, How?The USADA completely ignored a citizen's constitutional rights to a fair trial to hound Lance Armstrong, with no proof whatsoever and with no fair trial to determine that he took performance...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|