Should we control the growth of our population? And if so, who should refrain fr

Jump to Last Post 1-6 of 6 discussions (9 posts)
  1. Sterling Sage profile image75
    Sterling Sageposted 7 years ago

    Should we control the growth of our population? And if so, who should refrain from having children?

    Would you personally agree not to have children if it would keep the world and its people healthy? What would be a just way to curtail reproduction?

    The Human population is always growing, and our world has limited resources. The more depleted our resources become, the more urgently we need to limit our own growing numbers.

    If it were up to you, who would have children and who wouldn't? How would you decide?

    I'm especially interested to hear from young people who haven't (yet) had any kids, but I encourage anyone with a good idea to share it.

  2. H P Roychoudhury profile image48
    H P Roychoudhuryposted 7 years ago

    For the protection of the world- weather we are conducting Copenhagen Green House Gas conference. For preventing nuclear holocaust, we are thinking through UN to formulate non-proliferation treaty. But what is about over population, the effect of which is going to destroy the pleasure and beauty of the world. For a disciplined happy family, the family require an estimated budget of expenditure, and a limited number of family members. Similarly a happy universe require equal-distribution of wealth and a control of population region wise that might be by moral teachings if failed by uniform enforcement of law.

  3. nightwork4 profile image60
    nightwork4posted 7 years ago

    though i might sound harsh, anyone who is not able to afford their kids , shouldn't be having them. social assistance is great but when a person raises their kids on it as their main sourse of income , it's not right. we don't have the right to say who can or can't have kids but we do have the right to use common sense before we have them. also people who have serious genetic problems shouldn't have kids due to the fact that the kids will end up being a burden on society .

  4. Jefsaid profile image67
    Jefsaidposted 7 years ago

    Who would be denied? is the question.  How can one person be denied over another?  How can accidental pregnancies be avoided or even determined? Would compulsory abortions be required?  Maybe there could be the requirement to hold a license to prove you are able to financially support a child although again circumstances can change and what would be the measure. 

    I can see no real solution other than one of two extremes - education or dictatorship.  Anything in between would be contentious.

  5. sarasca profile image70
    sarascaposted 7 years ago

    I agree with the person who answered that anyone who cannot AFFORD to raise a child should not be permitted to have one.  It seems anymore that more people live on government assistance than don't.

    Since this is a hypothetical question, issues relating to politics (i.e. dictatorship status) are moot.

    People under the age of 25 should not have children, because they are not mentally or emotionally mature enough to comprehend what it means to give up your priorities for at least 18 years and place someone else's needs above your own.

    People who are already on government assistance should not be permitted to have children.

    People who have more than child by more than one parent should not be allowed to have another child by yet another person.

    People who have EVER had an abortion should not be allowed to have children.  They should've given it up for adoption so someone who couldn't have kids could have given it a good home and a good life.

    People who cannot successfully demonstrate that they are capable of existing as responsible, independent adults should not be permitted to have children.  (This includes people who still live with mommy and daddy for whatever reason.)

    People who have terminal diseases with a remaining lifespan of less than 20 years should not be permitted to have children,, because a CHILD should not have to lose a parent.

    People who have been in a relationship with each other for less than THREE YEARS should not be permitted to have children.

    People who have ever been convicted of sexual offenses against a child should not be permitted to have children.

    I guess I could go on...but there you go.  Food for thought.

  6. andrew savage profile image59
    andrew savageposted 5 years ago

    For the benefit of maintaining sustainability and stability on our planet, I highly recommend enacting a law to make it so that everyone is required to take drugs that will render them temporarily infertile until they find a suitable match and have taken a screening test to see if they have the aptitude and skills essential to bringing another life into this world. This solution is very easy, as it would begin with where we are now as a society and would continue through weeding out bad elements within our universal culture and preventing such bad elements from becoming poison in the well so to speak. An IQ test is a very good example of a test to include into the rubicon or rubric of creating more people. And there may very well be many other tests and evaluations that we should implement into creating a license department for creating children. Moreover passing legislation for such a proposal will make removing genetic disorders from the population much easier, and other countries and cultures would no longer have to have prearranged marriages, thus granting the people a civil liberty to replace one that has been lost. That civil liberty of course being to seek out your partner freely, while signing onto the policy of selective or intelligent reproduction.

    1. profile image0
      CalebSparksposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      That idea is one the most monstrous and dictatorial notions I have ever heard of. Who has the rightful authority to regulate reproduction? Certainly no human power.
      May you never come to any position of authority. You lack basic morality.

    2. andrew savage profile image59
      andrew savageposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Perhaps. Perhaps it is far worse to excede one's carrying capacity of the world and to go on while we deplete tomorrow resources. My idea would prevent wars, famine, malnutrition and the death of potentially billions of souls.

    3. profile image0
      CalebSparksposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      You are fighting an imaginary war, brought to a frenzy radical idealists. The earth is not overpopulated. Better management of current resources and better planning for future production would be more worth the time.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)