After 70 years, why do we still call the attack on Pearl Harbor a sneak attack?
It was a time of war and we knew that the entire Japanese navy was sitting 100 miles west of Pearl Harbor. Admiral Nimitz warned of an attack but Washington, with their infinite wisdom said the Japanese wouldn't dare attack. What did they think was going to happen, the Japanese navy was coming for tea.
Had similar thoughts yesterday when I heard a news reporter frame it as a sneak attack. Common sense tells us that war is all about covert activity.
People often pretend to come for tea in their personal lives when their intent is actually clandestine. One has to ask why anyone would deceive themselves about what happens in war time.
Actually if you follow the historical timeline of the events, the Japanese and American diplomats were in the middle of peace talks at the time. Japan had intimated that they were not looking to take any American territories, unlike what they had already done with the western Pacific rim and parts of China. Unfortunately, we did not know they were as close as they were due to the cut backs in the National Defense budget.
The Japanese Ambassador in Washington was suppose to hand the Declaration of War to our Secretary of Defense, 30 min. prior to the attack. There was a problem with the decoding of the order from Japan to the Japanese Ambassador which set the time of declaring war on us not until after the attack already happened.
That is why it has been looked down upon, because war had not been declared by either side, and the Japanese had been actually talking peace rather than what took months of planning.
Because it was a sneakie thing to do!Why do we after 70 yeasr call what Hitler did to the jews a mass genicide?
by Sid Kemp 5 years ago
Is it valuable to remember Pearl Harbor? If so, why? If not, why not?Today is the anniversary of Pearl Harbor. When I was growing up in the 1960s and 70s, it was an important day. My parents remembered the horrible surprise of the attack. It was "a day that will live in infamy." Now, the...
by Deforest 6 years ago
Pear Harbor, the Tonkin gulf incident, the september 11th attack, this clash have the same common denominator, a U.S. attack leading to a "justified" international intervention to an invasion or war. Many of you will refute the theory but, unfortunately it passed the theory level to being...
by Credence2 22 months ago
Another reason that I distrust conservatives, (GOP) domestic spending is pinch penny, while they turn a blind eye to DOD wasting money like it grows on trees. Add this to their cover up and subsequent embarrassment, and I ask what makes THEM the sacred cow? As a progressive type, I consider THIS...
by sushant143 7 years ago
what if japan not attack on pearl harbor?the main reason to enter in WW-II for USA is pearl harbor . what if japan not attack on pearl harbor? can USA enter in War ?
by manlypoetryman 8 years ago
“A Date Which Will Live in Infamy”: FDR Asks for a Declaration of War."The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, on December 7, 1941, stunned virtually everyone in the United States military. Japan’s carrier-launched bombers found Pearl Harbor totally unprepared. President Franklin...
by tobey100 8 years ago
A mosque at Ground Zero. How about a monument to Kamikaze Pilots at Pearl Harbor or a statue of Harry Truman in Hiroshima? It’s not a matter of religious freedom or race. It’s a matter of decency and common sense. There are plenty of other properties in New York City,...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|