what if japan not attack on pearl harbor?
the main reason to enter in WW-II for USA is pearl harbor . what if japan not attack on pearl harbor? can USA enter in War ?
well may be that would have delayed usa's entry in war or may be usa might have not entered war ...who knows..there are ifs and buts involved...
If Japan had not attacked Pearl Harbor -- the Wars raging in Europe would have remained separate and distinct from the Second Sino-Japanese War in Asia.
Japan's attack first on British Malaya -- and then on Pearl Harbor MERGED the wars in Europe and Asia and made it the Second World War.
I've written 3 hubs which answer your question:
WWII -- Did it begin at Pearl Harbor
The Greater East Asia War & WWII
WWII -- understand it within the hour
I hope those help!
If Japan had not attacked Pearl Harbor, the outcome of World War II might have turned out completely different. Here is why:
1.) The militarists that control Japan during the war were divided into two groups depending which military doctrine they supported: the Hokushin-ron or the Nanshin-ron.
Hokushin-ron - Northern Strike. These Japanese warlords focused on expanding their empire on the Asian mainland. This meant conquering the rest of China, and going to war against the Soviet Union. Northern Strike enthusiasts were mainly brushed aside after the Battles of Khalkhyn Gol (1939), a border skirmish in which the Soviets and their Mongol allies dealt the Japanese military a swift and decisive defeat.
Nanshin-ron - Southern Expansion. Supporters of this doctrine wished to occupy the resource rich areas of Southeast Asia. This put them in complete conflict with the European powers that controlled the region: France (Indochina), Great Britain (Honk Kong, India, Burma, Malaysia, and Singapore), and the Netherlands (Indonesia). The Southern doctrine also targeted America, which controlled the Philippines, several strategic Pacific Islands, and the largest naval force in the region.This strategy was more appealing due to the resources in the area, Japan basically has no natural resources, and the fact that the European Powers were preoccupied with Hitler.
The only way Japan would not have attacked Pearl Harbor is if they went North rather than South. I would imagine that being invaded from both the East and West would have been too much for the Soviet Union to handle. The USSR would most likely have surrendered to the Axis powers. Even if this was the case, Japan would have most likely turned back to the Southern Doctrine once the USSR was defeated due to the resources it could have supplied for the empire.
Could Pearl Harbor have been avoided? I personally do not think so. if the Japanese did not attack on December 7, 1941, they would have attacked eventually in the future.
This question is a year old, but I just saw it and wanted to get my answer on record. Prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor, FDR gave Japan an ultimatum that we would go to war if Japan did not end its war on China. Japan would never do this. But the US would never actually declare war on Japan because 90% of the US was against entering another foreign war. The Japanese did not know this, so they made the first strike to cripple the US Navy and Army in the Pacific. In other words, there is no way an attack against the US would not have occured somewhere by Japan. So let's assume Japan merely attacked the Philippines and sunk a few US vessels elsewhere. The US Pacific fleet would have remained intact and would have been able to support Macarthur in the Philippines. If Macarthur retained the Philippines, our airfields and troops would have been more prepared to bomb mainland Japan sooner, thus ending the war against Japan probably by 1943. This would have ended the war in Europe sooner while, FDR was still alive. A living FDR means no nuclear weapons, no cold war, no Korean War.
by Sid Kemp 5 years ago
Is it valuable to remember Pearl Harbor? If so, why? If not, why not?Today is the anniversary of Pearl Harbor. When I was growing up in the 1960s and 70s, it was an important day. My parents remembered the horrible surprise of the attack. It was "a day that will live in infamy." Now, the...
by Deforest 5 years ago
Pear Harbor, the Tonkin gulf incident, the september 11th attack, this clash have the same common denominator, a U.S. attack leading to a "justified" international intervention to an invasion or war. Many of you will refute the theory but, unfortunately it passed the theory level to being...
by Credence2 20 months ago
Another reason that I distrust conservatives, (GOP) domestic spending is pinch penny, while they turn a blind eye to DOD wasting money like it grows on trees. Add this to their cover up and subsequent embarrassment, and I ask what makes THEM the sacred cow? As a progressive type, I consider THIS...
by Jay S 6 years ago
After 70 years, why do we still call the attack on Pearl Harbor a sneak attack? It was a time of war and we knew that the entire Japanese navy was sitting 100 miles west of Pearl Harbor. Admiral Nimitz warned of an attack but Washington, with their infinite wisdom said the Japanese wouldn't dare...
by Rajinder Soni 8 years ago
Tell me some controversial facts about pearl harbor
by Ron Montgomery 9 years ago
John Stewart recently agreed with a Daily Show guest that Harry Truman was a war criminal. Later, Stewart retracted his stated opinion and talked about the complexities that went into Truman's decision. This isn't a new contoversy, it started as soon as the bombings of Hiroshima and...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|