Absolutely not. Nothing good can or will come from nuclear weapons but distruction. The sooner we eliminate these life threatening mechanisms, the sooner we ensure our longivity here on earth.
I agree with you, but I asked the question to see how many people are for or against countries with these weapons of mass destruction
If people would be mentally on a higher level, then I would say yes - but not for defence against other nations. Nuclear weapons are our primary defence when it comes to a threat of an asteroid on trajectory to earth (not as impossible as one would assume) so it would be nice to have a widely spread defence and a good number of nukes.
However as we are still globally mentally retarded and there will always be someone, some leader that will have the need to use these horrible weapons for mass destruction to harm people, the answer is no, no and again no.
No. These weapons create nothing but fear to other small countries who are not equipped with these weapons, and on the other hand countries who are equipped will act as if they own everything because they can threaten people and other countries by their weapons.
If one country has them, then every country should need them for their own protection.
Of course it would be better if noone had them. Most countries have nuclear weapons to let other countries know that if they send a nuclear missile, they will get one back.
It is just like the cold war. All sides will have them, but noone will want to use them.
by Steve5 years ago
What is the greatest threat to the world today?In today's world we are facing struggling economies, religious extremism, greed and poverty to just name a few. In your opinion what is the greatest threat to world peace...
by Jack Lee10 months ago
It is a delemma for me. As a conservative and one who does not like wars unless absolutely necessary, I am just not sure what we can do in this case.You have a dictator who is treated as a god by his own people, almost...
by Miss Info6 years ago
Why is it okay for the US to harbor weapons of mass destruction, but not okay for any other country?We all know that the US is in possession of weapons of mass destruction. Therefore, why is this okay for the US, but...
by Zubair Ahmed6 years ago
Professor Francis Boyle, the person who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 enacted by the US Congress, said that in 2001-2004, the US Federal Government spent $14.5 billion for civilian...
by Mike Russo8 months ago
What did America do to make North Korea hate us?
by dadibobs6 years ago
If Iran was to succeed in developing a nuclear weapon, how should our own nations react?Would we strike at the construction facitily, and possible storage sites?, or do we just use a nuclear weapon on them first?....
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.