jump to last post 1-5 of 5 discussions (5 posts)

Does the President truly have power over social issues, or does the American's p

  1. angela_michelle profile image99
    angela_michelleposted 6 years ago

    Does the President truly have power over social issues, or does the American's popular opinion have

    Does the President truly have power over social issues, or does the American's popular opinion have more influence?

  2. JohnGreasyGamer profile image84
    JohnGreasyGamerposted 6 years ago

    It depends which option makes him look better - the more he does that people don't like, the less support he has in the future. Yet if he interacts with his people, and asks them what should be done, maybe they can solve the issues. An example of this would be in the film Gladiator, where Russell Crowe gets more support from the fans than the Emperor of Rome. Later, he is told,

    "In that moment, a slave became more powerful than the Emperor of Rome!"

    If things go well, the people will earn his support a lot faster if they do it. Yet if they do, and things go wrong, it's typical that they'll expect the president to fix them. It can be a major responsibility that will change lives for years to come.

  3. ib radmasters profile image61
    ib radmastersposted 6 years ago

    Neither the president nor the people have power over social issues. Social issues change from generation to generation and the change may or may not be beneficial but some group of people will never be happy with the state of social issues.

    Some politicians, some groups and some people may try to usurp a virtual power over social issues but that is not real power.

  4. Vik Beluso profile image75
    Vik Belusoposted 5 years ago

    The President's powers are quite limited, though they have grown beyond those provided by the Constitution.  This is not unique to the US but is part of the trend of growth of executive power in representative governments since the early 1900s.  More regulations having the force of law are made by the various agencies of the executive than by the legislative process.  These rules, it should be noted, are never presented to the electorate for approval.  Nevertheless the President himself has a very limited effect on government policy.  This can be seen by the general continuity of policy, foreign and domestic, regardless of who occupies the office.  It is unfortunate that so many Americans seem to see the President as a kind of King, who determines major changes and bears sole responsibility for the state of things during his tenure.  It's a kind of mythology that obscures the true workings of the system, to which the President is more or less insignificant.
    As far as social policy goes, the major lines are determined like any other type of policy, by the organized actions of interested groups.  If there are enough people with enough commitment and resources working for a certain cause, and working effectively, pressure will be exerted on the architects of policy.  If this pressure, which may include public opinion but might not, is sufficient it's likely to result in the kind of thing they want.  All domestic policy works this way, whether the cause is civil rights or the abolition of the capital gains tax. Public opinion is basically irrelevant unless it is organized to exert pressure. Very small minorities can bring effective pressure to besr if they are organized, committed, and command the resources.  The President will respond to this pressure just like any other part of the system.  If he or she is too resistant, they will lose the support of thier party and that's it for them.
    The only part of the government, in he US at least, that can hold out against this organization pressure is the judiciary.  It has by far the largest impact on social reality of any govt branch, through long-lasting and unaccountable decisions which remain in force for hundreds of years, perhaps, unless overturned by another judicial ruling.

  5. joyce31202 profile image77
    joyce31202posted 4 years ago

    The popular opinion rules. The President is president not a King. He is just one person. The majority for the most part tend to have power over social issues.