Have we lost the war on Poverty?
In case you didn't know, the government offers low income people food stamps. It appears that at least the government doesn't think you know. They are waging an ad campaign focused on seniors. Have we lost the war on poverty? Why aren't all of the government programs, (food stamps, welfare, medicaid, extended unemployment benefits, etc) helping? Why has the divide between rich and poor widened? Would it be better to throw more government money at the problem or less?
Big question. I've never been convinced that we're really fighting a war on poverty since the neediest members of our society continue to be more or less invisible.
I don't approve of "throwing" government money under any circumstances. Expenditures need to be carefully planned and targeted.
Redistribution of income would help, but nothing seems to get people's hackles up quicker than merely suggesting such a thing. Certainly the stagnation and/or diminishing of middle class incomes requires action, but what? Unregulated capitalism has long been known to lead to income disparity, as well as the disruption of the middle class's means for regaining parity, such as unions.
There should ALWAYS be an aggressive war on poverty. There's financial poverty, educational poverty, moral poverty; someone is alway lacking something though no fault of their own.
But, rather than give them money or a home, we ought to provide the tools to teach people to get out of their OWN KIND OF POVERTY.
However, in no way, shape or form do I believe that "Redistribution of income would help" There is something that has led to income disparity, but I don't believe it is unregulated capitalism. Unions were a good attempt to equal that disparity in the early 20th century during the industrial revolution, but I don't see that unions are doing much good now. The bosses are getting wealthy off of the union worker who spend a good chunk of his paycheck and all the unions deliver is mediocrity and guaranteed benefits for mediocrity! Not what they were intended for.
The war has not been lost. If it was lost, then it would be much worse. The fact that they are doing something changes the situation to be a little better.
by kerryg 8 years ago
Funding for our country's children is being cut, but we allow a hedge fund manager to make enough money to pay the salaries of every public school teacher in New York City. Most of his earnings are taxed at a rate less than that of his secretary.We haven't been able to do anything about it because...
by TheDailyMessenger 5 years ago
Whats your opinion on how the elections are going? Who are you voting for?
by JON EWALL 7 years ago
The meaning of SOCIAL relates to individuals or groups. JUSTICE relates to fair treatment, correct treatment or judgment. Simple words that have so many interpretations in our world today. The world today has not changed, the poor, the middle class and the rich continue to inhabit the earth as it...
by Jane Taxpayer 2 years ago
Why does poverty even exist in 'advanced' nations, such as Canada, U.S., and Great Britain?To get a better answer to some other questions I've posted, I need to know why such 'wealthy' nations even have a poverty problem in the first place.
by icv 2 years ago
Do you think, the political system is the force behind expanding wealth inequality?Thomas Picketty's book says, the existence of inequality is widening day by day. What you think on that?
by Reality Bytes 7 years ago
This question was asked during the last debate. No one answered it.What percentage of a workers income should the worker be allowed to keep? What is a fair share?50%, 60% what do you think?The question was asked in dollars, I have rephrased it because I am interested in those...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|