Is it a bad sign when Republicans are willing to roast Chuck Hagel simply becaus

Jump to Last Post 1-6 of 6 discussions (12 posts)
  1. Steven Dison profile image78
    Steven Disonposted 5 years ago

    Is it a bad sign when Republicans are willing to roast Chuck Hagel simply because Obama picked him?

    The roughly 8 hour hearing seemed to be more about petty politics from certain Republicans, rather than an actual job interview, which it's supposed to be like. To me, at least, it seems like it's motivated from the fact that he was picked by Obama. It doesn't matter if he's a Republican and agrees on 90% of issues. They almost act like he's not even in their party. Just seems like a bad sign when partisan politics gets to this level. What are your thoughts?

  2. profile image0
    Ghost32posted 5 years ago

    My first thought is that we must have been watching different hearings.  I knew nothing about Hagel, but his responses to questions struck me as essentially incomptent.  I know if Defense Secretary McNamara had come across like that when he was powering up the shipment of troops to Vietnam (during my time in the service), I'd have been bending over, grabbing my ankles, and kissing my a** goodbye.

    In other words, it didn't seem like the Republicans were roasting Hagel so much as he was roasting himself.

  3. Steven Dison profile image78
    Steven Disonposted 5 years ago

    I certainly agree that his answers were less than ideal. He seemed to meander a bit and just drone on. Definitely not a good hearing for him, so I admit that that. But, here's why I thought the Republicans were a bit odd toward him. For instance, McCain would let it go that him and mHagel disagreed on whether the surge actually worked or not. He kept interrupting him and really pressing him for an answer to a really quite irrelevant question. It's a shame he couldn't come up with a better answer, like "who cares? The whole war was started for the wrong reasons. So, yes, I was wrong. The surge worked, but the real lesson we should learn is to not invade a nation of false pretenses or because it's led by a "bad" guy." Sadly, that was not his answer.

    Also, they seemed to pester him about his comments about the Jewish lobby over and over. He's already apologized for that comment numerous times. It's really not a big deal. He should of said pro-Israel lobby. His answer to this was also not ideal, but even so, it was a dumb and in my opinion, politically motivated question, as they all knew what he meant. His voting record is quite clear on how he supports Israel. He should have answered that, "the exact reason you're asking me this stupid question shows how some people are intimidated by the pro-isreal lobby..."

    So, I agree with your assertion that some of his answers were less than good even. He seemed very restrained and un-Hagel-like. But, my point was that *some* of the Republican questions were stupid. They should have focused on what he'd do as secretary of defense, if confirmed, rather than some comments from years ago that he has already apologized for publically.

    1. junko profile image77
      junkoposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Hagel seemed as bewildered as President Obama in the first debate with Romney, when Romney surprize him with negative aggressive rudeness. He as Obama should have expected a floor show from the right.

    2. Steven Dison profile image78
      Steven Disonposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Yeah, it seemed like he was being restrained by something. The real Chuck Hagel wouldn't have put up with any of that malarkey.

  4. point2make profile image80
    point2makeposted 5 years ago

    Chuck Hagel has a history of taking "interesting" positions on important issues and those positions often baffle Republicans and Democrats alike. The fact that his confirmation hearing is not going well is no surprise to anyone. Obama knew it was going to be difficult.. He is not being "roasted' because Obama picked him....He is being "roasted" because his grasp, and past statements, of the issues is confusing at best and incompetent at worst.  Leon Panetta the current Secretary of Defense was a Obama nomination and he has widespread support amongst the Republicans. The problems Chuck Hagel is having is not really associated with Obama or the Republicans.....Chuck Hagel's biggest obstacle to overcome is...... Chuck Hagel.

    1. Steven Dison profile image78
      Steven Disonposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Okay, that's fine. They should have focused on what he'd do in the future! Asking about his policy positions is fine, but harping on comments about the surge and the "Jewish" lobby just wastes time. It's political gamesmanship.

    2. point2make profile image80
      point2makeposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Congressional confirmation hearings are NOT a job interview. They are pure political theater. It doesn't matter whether the nominee is Republican or Democrat...whether we like it or not...this is the true vetting process.

    3. Steven Dison profile image78
      Steven Disonposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Well, if I recall correctly, the John Kerry hearings weren't like that. Though, there's a good reason for that. With John Kerry being picked, the Republicans have a good chance at adding a Senate seat, even with Scott Brown deciding not to run.

  5. peoplepower73 profile image94
    peoplepower73posted 5 years ago

    When a person goes for a job interview, the person doing the interview wants to know what you bring to the table to see if you are qualified for the job, not argue as to who was right about past events that are difficult to prove at best.  This was all political theater.  It's all part of the non-compromising, obstructionist game plan of the Republican Party. It's all about party, not what can we do for this country!  In a sense, the Republican party was being interviewed by the viewers...and in my view, they lost. Their game plan must change for the greater good of the country or we as a nation are in trouble.

    1. Steven Dison profile image78
      Steven Disonposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Exactly! If they were really serious about giving him a fair hearing they wouldn't have focused on the moronic statements of the past (or at least not made such a big deal of), but rather gauge his response to tough questions about the future.

  6. ib radmasters profile image60
    ib radmastersposted 5 years ago

    Both the democrats and the republicans do these things when they are in the minority. It happens all the time, this is nothing new.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)