The Third Law

Jump to Last Post 1-6 of 6 discussions (36 posts)
  1. Mikel G Roberts profile image77
    Mikel G Robertsposted 8 years ago

    In the definition of the Laws of Motion Newton states:

    Whenever a first body exerts a force F on a second body, the second body exerts a force −F on the first body. F and −F are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.

    Later someone attempts to clarify with:

    Whenever a particle A exerts a force on another particle B, B simultaneously exerts a force on A with the same magnitude in the opposite direction. The strong form of the law further postulates that these two forces act along the same line. This law is often simplified into the sentence, "To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction."

    While I agree that the first statement is partially true, it is also very easy to jump to a secondary belief, that is not correct, as illustrated in the latter clarification.

    Whenever a first body exerts a force F on a second body, the second body exerts a force −F on the first body. TRUE, but only with the addition of, for a split second. Then one of two things occur:
    If the first body has a greater force(F) than the second body has resistance(-F), the second body will move. If the secondary body has greater resistance(-F) than the force(F) of the first body the secondary body will remain at rest.

    In other words, If I am (F) the first body, and a mountain is (-F) , the second body, and I push on the mountain... it will not move. But if I(F) push against a pebble(-f), it will move. because the resistance(-f) , [the amount of force] that the pebble has is less than,(not equal to) the amount of force I am exerting on it. So the forces are opposite, but not equal, hence motion. In the time it takes for the forces to interact there is a split second where the forces are equal and opposite, but after that split second the forces are UN-equal and may or may not be opposite.

    If the bodies (the two forces) act along the same line. In the case of (-F) being the greater force, the force(F) of the first body is redirected in the opposite direction, the direction of origin, and causes the first body to "bounce".

    In the case of deflection, the forces are not opposite and one or both "bodies" will alter course(trajectory) based on the amounts of force applied, mass of the bodies, and velocity.

    Am I Wrong?

    1. ediggity profile image61
      ediggityposted 8 years ago

      I can't quite follow what you are trying to say, or what your question is, but the forces exerted on each object will be equal, even though the result of the force to the naked eye looks different.  Just think if a Ford Fiesta ran head on into a Mac truck.  The Force at impact will be equal, but the reaction of the two vehicles will be disturbingly different. I think what you are trying to understand is the Conservation of Momentum.  What you described, from what I can gather is an elastic case unless you are saying it loses its kinetic energy.  Then it would be inelastic.

      Check it out along with Newton's 3rd Law here

      http://230nsc1.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbasees/hframe.html
      Click Mechanics/Conservation of Momentum

      1. Mikel G Roberts profile image77
        Mikel G Robertsposted 8 years agoin reply to this

        NO it won't the force of the Mac truck will be greater and the Mac truck will continue along it's trajectory. Equal and Oppostie would mean they (both objects) would stop instantly at the precise point of impact. Of course if the third law was true, they couldn't have gotten past the intial effect to acheive motion in the first place...

        1. ediggity profile image61
          ediggityposted 8 years agoin reply to this

          Yes, it would.  What you are describing is the conservation of momentum.  The Force would even be the same if a mosquito flew into the windshield of the same Mac Truck.  Maybe this will do a better job of explaining it for you.  Remember, equal and opposite.

          http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/N … /U2L4a.cfm

          1. Mikel G Roberts profile image77
            Mikel G Robertsposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            Whenever a first body exerts a force F on a second body, the second body exerts a force −F on the first body. TRUE, but only with the addition of, for a split second.

            Newton was wrong about the rest of it, because then one of two things occur:
            If the first body has a greater force(F) than the second body has resistance(-F), the second body will move. If the secondary body has greater resistance(-F) than the force(F) of the first body the secondary body will remain at rest.

            But the forces are NOT equal and opposite for anything more than the split second it takes for the greater force to overpower the lesser force

    2. ediggity profile image61
      ediggityposted 8 years ago

      LOL, ok man whatever you say.  Did you even review the conservation of momentum?

      The Force= mass x acceleration (delta V/delta T)

      The Force wont even become a factor until the collision, or whatever it is being exerted on.  One object isn't going to randomly produce any more Force than the other.  That is why you need to review the Conservation of Momentum.  No, an object remains at rest unless acted upon by an outside Force.  That is the First law not the third.  lastly, there is no greater.  If there was airplanes wouldn't fly, and cars wouldn't drive down the street.  Sorry, but Newton got that right.  You are mixing up the laws.

      http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HB … kc.html#c2

      1. Mikel G Roberts profile image77
        Mikel G Robertsposted 8 years agoin reply to this

        Your trying to add a secondary theory, that is not relevant to the discussion we're having. Though it is in a related field, and plays a seperate part.

        My point is Newton and you are saying: if Every force is equal and opposite, then force=force and mass x acceleration is irrelivant... which obviously isn't correct, so you and Newton are wrong.

        1. ediggity profile image61
          ediggityposted 8 years agoin reply to this

          I'm not adding any secondary theory.
          F=ma is Newton's second Law.

          We wouldn't even have a 3rd if the second wasn't there.  Like I said, you are getting them mixed up.  You are confusing impulse Force and the Conservation of Momentum.  Lastly, it's not irrelevant if you want to know how much Force there was at the time of impact.  It's very useful, and helps determine safety restraints etc..

          1. Mikel G Roberts profile image77
            Mikel G Robertsposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            And that is my point, the second makes the latter part of the third incorrect, There IS NOT an equal and opposite reaction, there are consequences that may or may not be equal and/or opposite.

            1. ediggity profile image61
              ediggityposted 8 years agoin reply to this

              No, the second LAW proves there is a Force, and the third just explains what that Force does.

              The Force is always equal and opposite.

              1. Mikel G Roberts profile image77
                Mikel G Robertsposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                if F=MA then MA=F and if F=ma; MA=f=ma right?
                then MA=ma still with me?
                M=10
                F=10
                m=1
                a=1 
                then your saying 10 times 10= 100 and 1 times1 =1 so 100=1?
                the forces are not always equal. nor are they always opposite, what if the mosquito t-bones the Mac truck...

                the third law states F=f always every single time...and is therefore WRONG.

                1. ediggity profile image61
                  ediggityposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                  LOL, sorry but you are really confused. That is correct what you said.  In that case the Force cancels out. Think of it like this.  There is a book, resting on a table, producing a downward Force.  In turn that table is producing the same exact force upward, and they cancel out.  Reading the Law and being able to apply it are two different things.  What you described earlier is an inelastic collision.  In addition, the force is used to calculate many things including Work.  If the Mosquito T-bones the truck the Forces would still be equal in opposite directions.  The truck is only going to put back as much Force as the Mosquito exerts onto it...always....and forever.  It's not like the Mosquito hits the truck, and the truck says, "you son of a B!@#ch" and then can magically conjure up some super Force to propel back at the Mosquito.  It's basically an eye for an eye every time.

                  1. Mikel G Roberts profile image77
                    Mikel G Robertsposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                    I don't think so...It is true that for a split second the force that the baseball applies to the bat is equal and opposite, but only for that split second. Then the greater force, mass, velocity of the bat UN-equals the action of the ball and sends it flying. The action of the ball flying is an action unto itself, the stopping of the ball is too an action. The equal and opposite reaction of the "ball stopping" action, is that the ball never stop moving. Since the ball does stop, again the third "law" is proved inaccurate...

                    Your example of the table isn't a very good example becasue the force of gravity and the forces of the objects are all interacting...

                    1. ediggity profile image61
                      ediggityposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                      LOL, that is my whole point.  That is what the third law says.  My book example is two stationary objects exerting a Force.  You are confusing that with two objects in motion.  You can't do that! THERE IS NO ACCELERATION OF A BOOK RESTING ON A TABLE! I don't know how I can say it any more clearly.  Read the CONSERVATION OF MOMENTUM!

                      Here's your baseball.

                      http://library.thinkquest.org/11902/phy … entum.html

                      Lastly, if you want to believe that Newton's Laws are incorrect, because you are unwilling to actually put forth the effort to understand them, then be my guest.

    3. profile image0
      Denno66posted 8 years ago

      Is that like the third law of robotics?

      1. Mikel G Roberts profile image77
        Mikel G Robertsposted 8 years agoin reply to this

        Third Law of Motion

      2. Stimp profile image73
        Stimpposted 8 years agoin reply to this

        We are in way over our heads here....we gotta split, man, split like a fat man's pants.

        1. profile image0
          Denno66posted 8 years agoin reply to this

          I thinks yer right....

          1. Stimp profile image73
            Stimpposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            giggity!

            1. profile image0
              Denno66posted 8 years agoin reply to this

              OMG! You rock!!!! big_smile

              1. Stimp profile image73
                Stimpposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                Fn-A....sorry, that's MY favorite phrase.  But I looked yours up.

                1. profile image0
                  Denno66posted 8 years agoin reply to this

                  I say it so often , I may have to retire it....

              2. Mikel G Roberts profile image77
                Mikel G Robertsposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                Thank You Thank You smile

    4. ediggity profile image61
      ediggityposted 8 years ago

      Only if it doesn't conflict with the first or second law.

      1. Mikel G Roberts profile image77
        Mikel G Robertsposted 8 years agoin reply to this

        LMAO

    5. ediggity profile image61
      ediggityposted 8 years ago

      Here is a really good example of Newton's third law.

      http://www.batesville.k12.in.us/physics … dCart.html

      If you really want to understand it, then you will read the whole thing.  Additionally, I also realized that you don't understand how to sum vector Forces.  I highly recommend reviewing that also to fully understand Newton's laws.

      http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/n … /u2l2d.cfm

     
    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)