Congress Gets Tax Payer Funded Healthcare Why Don't They Want The Rest Of Us To Get It?
Good question. I think it's because they are basically corporationists. They believe health care should accrue to high ranking executives as a "perk" or reward for their high ranking services.
If we all had publicly funded health care, it would diminish their "differential", their added privilege for serving the public as selflessly and magnificently as they do. If we erode this differential, what incentive would they have for trying to achieve high office?
Ironically, they claim that a "single-provider plan" is not achieveable at the moment and, if you could get them to be truthful, they would tell you that the country cannot afford it. The point is...ObamaCare is not about healthcare...never has been. It is about gaining control over and into our lives using a single tool. One only has to list the built in "booby-traps" like tax on real estate sales, mandatory penalties, Care-Review panels who give a thumbs up or down on certain care for certain age groups. This is not about a concern for healthcare but more a case of "giving up handouts" in order to buy voter loyalty. The vote of those who cannot afford to pay carries more weight today apparently than the vote of those who will pay for it does. My Congressman showed us his healthcare card at a local town hall meeting. He is covered under Blue Cross Blue Shield like all federal employees. His deductible on major medical is $350 per year. I do not believe he is not of pocket for the cost of the coverage which is huge...$6000 or more per year. Much of the woes of our current medical costs could be addressed by resolving issues associated with frivilous lawsuits. Since Congress is filled mostly with lawyers, you can figure out why there is no action in that regard.
Such conspiracy theories imply the government has some level of competency. There's corruption, sure, but not in a "lets pass a healthcare bill that secretly controls peoples' lives" kind of way.
In my last job I was in a PPO with virtually no out of pocket expenses. My share of the premium was about $1,000 per month. I am paying that much for "wannabe" insurance that covers hardly anything. There are many problems to address.
We elect congress so technically we don't want it for ourselves. In the end tax payer funded Healthcare comes out of your pocket anyways! Obamacare is already on it's way so let us just see how it turns out.
''so let us....out.'' 9/20/13
Obama's big debt limit deception
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/19/opinion/g … index.html OBAMACARE MUST BE REPEALED POTUS says ''TRUST ME'' don't be STUPID?
I do not agree with you. That is my right. I think you are incorrect. For me, a 62-year-old man with prior health conditions who cannot buy health insurance. Obamacare is needed. I resent the implication that people who disagree with you are stupid.
I previously worked for a former Congressman. He said that he had to pay a portion of the premium. While the insurance he had in Congress was great, the policy we had at our office, was better, but it cost a lot. Unfortunately, when I was discharged after 22 years, I was denied retirement coverage but had a year of company-paid COBRA--could not convert because the group policy, we had does not write individual policies in my state. Thus at age 62 and with a medical history that is not stellar, I cannot buy real insurance. Therefore, I do support Obamacare--not all parts--but the part that will assure me the right to buy real insurance will cause me to accept the rest of the plan. Call me selfish if you wish. I spent eight days in the hospital in July. On the fourth day the bill was $19,000. I have not seen the final bill. If someone wants to pay the bill, I can provide the account number and hospital address. Obamacare is not going to solve that problem for me, but with my history, I expect more visits. It's tough getting old.
Because that would be "SOCIALISM!"
I'm being sarcastic, of course, but it's still a serious answer. Many people--i.e., voters--have this notion in their heads that a government health care plan would be "socialism." They have no qualms about driving their cars on the "socialist" public highways or sending their kids to the "socialist" public schools or calling the "socialist" public fire department when they see smoke, but for some crazy, wholly inexplicable reason, health care is different. It's really pretty mind-boggling. Regardless, the politicians aren't about to push for us to have taxpayer-funded health care because they perceive that it would be political suicide, and they may be right about that. Their survival instinct trumps their desire to do the right thing.
I believe that Obamacare is a step in the right direction, but ultimately a single-payer system ("Medicare for all") will be the only way to ensure that everyone has coverage. Moreover, it's something that we the people should demand. Health care is a basic human right--not a privilege or commodity. The profit motive has no place in health care.
Funny how "socialism" has come to be such a dirty word. I wonder if it's anything to do with media owned and controlled by capitalists? ))
Yes, very true. I guess it's somewhat comforting (and simple) for folks to think of the whole capitalism versus socialism issue as a dichotomy, but clearly it's not. Neither exists in pure form. By necessity, we've always had a hybrid system.
Just want to apologize to to Jon Ewall for accidentally deleting your post. Re post it if you will.
by Grace Marguerite Williams 5 weeks ago
Do you believe that the nuisance known as Obamacare will finally be repealed? Why? Why not?I believe that the government SHOULD NOT be in private affairs such as health care. I believe that health care is the sole responsibility of the individual. If individuals want health care,...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 13 months ago
Obama "care" for the most part has been a disaster. Premiums keep rising & for many, it has become exorbitantly expensive. According to the latest news, steps to repeal Obama"care" has been defeated. Trumpcare as it was proposed would have...
by Susie Lehto 14 months ago
Trey Gowdy posted this article link on Facebook minutes ago. It is the beginning of the end of Obamacare and a legacy.* http://thirdestatenewsgroup.com/breakin … d-to-know/The repeal legislation will go to the Senate next. A complete repeal is expected according to the article, and...
by Judy Specht 2 years ago
I have been listening to how the government has a billion dollars for getting people to sign up for the Affordable Healthcare Act. Would that money have been better spent training more doctors and building new hospitals? New Jersey has closed how many community hospitals in the last few...
by Dr Billy Kidd 6 years ago
For me, U.S. House majority leader Eric Cantor made the best lie on Morning Joe (6/29/2012). Cantor said that the law takes away your healthcare policy and replaces it with one dictated by Washington. NBC’s Tom Brokaw immediately challenged that. Brokaw said that the law states that you can keep...
by Susie Lehto 2 years ago
HEALTHCARE REFORM TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAINSince March of 2010, the American people have had to suffer under the incredible economic burden of the Affordable Care Act—Obamacare. This legislation, passed by totally partisan votes in the House and Senate and signed into law by the most divisive...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|