jump to last post 1-5 of 5 discussions (6 posts)

Would you vote for Hillary Clinton if she runs for President in 2016? Why?

  1. tsadjatko profile image63
    tsadjatkoposted 4 years ago

    Would you vote for Hillary Clinton if she runs for President in 2016? Why?

    Does a Tiger change it's stripes? Now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes. Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Sen. Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation. Google: Hillary Watergate.


  2. profile image0
    Old Poolmanposted 4 years ago

    No I would not vote for Hillary.  Not because she is a Clinton, or because she is a Democrat, or because she is a woman.  I would not vote for Hillary because she is a proven liar, a member of the Washington  "good ole boy" club, and just as corrupt as any member of this administration.

    To elect Hillary would just be extending the Obama reign of power because she marches to the same tune.  Hillary sold out a long time ago and is owned by some who use large sums of money to influence decisions by our government.

    We just don't need a new president who is already corrupt to the core.  We need some new blood who can have at least a few years before he or she sells out and becomes a puppet.

  3. sallieannluvslife profile image84
    sallieannluvslifeposted 4 years ago

    Absolutely not.  For many reasons, not the least being that she allowed American citizens to die in Benghazi and then had the audacity to scream in a hearing questioning their deaths, "At this point, what difference does it make?".  It makes a whole heck of a lot of difference if she and the Obama administration allows American citizens and military to die when they, with foreknowledge of the attack, allowed them to die and then like school children blamed an obscure youtube video.  She is a liar and deceiver.  Not qualified in the least for the oval office.

  4. LandmarkWealth profile image80
    LandmarkWealthposted 4 years ago

    No, but for too many reasons beyond the accusations you cited.  She was the source of too many scandals in the WH for an unelected official who should have been just the first lady, and not in charge of anything.  She appears to be a far less practical leader than her spouse.  And ultimately, this is someone who also was molded in the Saul Alinsky mindset.  She was closely aligned with him and even wrote her thesis on the man.

    Alinsky was an unapologetic Marxist, who regularly affiliated himself with members of the communist movement. Clinton wrote her thesis on the man linked to below which reflected quite favorably on him and his tactics.  It is sad that both she and our current President saw someone like this as a role model of sorts.  That doesn't necessarily make them communist.  But they are the real radicals.  Most people have no idea how twisted Alinsky was.  And if the average citizen who paid even a nominal amount of attention to politics would read "Rules for Radicals", they'd see the strategy behind their gov't at work today.

    http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/files/h … is-ocr.pdf

  5. tsadjatko profile image63
    tsadjatkoposted 4 years ago


    Interesting, 3 months and not one answer for Hillary for President 2016. Could it be that finally people got her number? or is it just that Hillary supporters prefer too stay in the closet so they don't have to discuss her record.

    Oh, I know it's that vast right wing conspiracy up to their dirty tricks. You don't want to get on their blacklist for backing Hillary! Well to console you I offer this, THERE IS NO VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY which by the way while popularized by Mrs. Clinton in her 1998 interview, the phrase did not originate with her but was from a Thatcher-era British crop of paranoid left-liberal films.

    Yes, that is what we want in the White house, the first woman president!  Who cares if she is a paranoid (vast right wing conspiracy), delusional liar
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co … 02989.html 
    who her own liberal leader a life long Democrat Zeifman said “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
    http://patdollard.com/2013/05/flashback … stitution/
    and who we all know was the one person responsible for the unnecessary death of four American Patriots and who collaborated to cover up the truth about it so that Obama could be re-elected and she'd have a chance at 2016...Well I say not a chance, America is waking up, we have had our fill of Saul Alinsky "radicals".

    1. tsadjatko profile image63
      tsadjatkoposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Hillary Clinton has no idea how regular people live. http://www.dickmorris.com/hillary-under … =dmreports