Which got off to a worse launch, Obamacare or the U.S. Satellite program which b

Jump to Last Post 1-4 of 4 discussions (7 posts)
  1. My Esoteric profile image91
    My Esotericposted 4 years ago

    Which got off to a worse launch, Obamacare or the U.S. Satellite program which began in 1955?

    Keep in mind of the 11 Vanguard launches, only 3 were successful; Vanguard was the official U.S satellite program although the Army was working, more successfully, on their own projects, e.g., Redstone, Juno, Jupiter.

    If Obama had been the President in 1955 instead of Eisenhower and the current crop of Conservatives ruled the Republican Party, would there even been a U.S. space program given the initial results?

  2. Tusitala Tom profile image67
    Tusitala Tomposted 4 years ago

    The question itself asks for a comparison but I think a key point is missed.  It is the intention of the program that is important.  Both programs are important; important at their outset and will continue to be into the distant future.   We need to know about 'space' and our place in it as we human beings expand and evolve.  We need to know that all of our species (and even those creatures which are not our species) are cared for.

    The United States has prided itself in being the leading nation of the world for the last hundred and twenty years or so, yet it is still miles behind a lot of other nations when it comes to looking after its populace.    Obama Care, as it is being called, is something that America should have introduced fifty years ago!

    1. My Esoteric profile image91
      My Esotericposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      So true but what is depressing is there are segments in both Parties who don't feel the exploration of space is a worthwhile effort and most on the Right believe gov't has no business providing support of any kind to its citizens beyond nat'l defense

  3. profile image54
    tbHistorianposted 4 years ago

    Obamacare got off to a worse launch because the Democrats that voted for the failure never read the document.  And now with the activation millions of citizens have lost their healthcare that they liked. 
    At least the satellite program had 3 successful launches.  And, they never ruined the lives of the middle-class, even with their failures.
    Besides, the satellite program only cost $20 million that year which was less than 1% of the GDP.
    Obamacare costs more than $27.5 trillion to those who pay and an additional $26.4 trillion for those who receive support from the government which is more than 28% of the GDP.
    Comparing apples and oranges like this is utterly ridiculous.
    However, with the disorganized radicals in charge, everything fails.

    1. My Esoteric profile image91
      My Esotericposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      BTW, how do you actually know nobody had their staffs read the law or found the time to read it themselves?  I hope you aren't relying solely on Pelosi's flippant remark and have other well-placed factual sources.

  4. junkseller profile image84
    junksellerposted 4 years ago

    If the current conservatives ruled the Republican party in the 50's, there wouldn't even be space, let alone a space program. There would just be the heavens and a belief that God wouldn't allow man to reach the heavens of their own accord (not unlike the global warming deniers who say only God can destroy the world), combined with a massive disinformation campaign saying that the Russians aren't really sending anything into the heavens, they are just lying communist, atheist, heathens trying to destroy God and America.

    Even so, I don't think it is the fairest comparison. Rocketry and getting satellites into space and properly orbiting the planet were still experimental technologies. Putting together a website isn't. And the other big failure of Obamacare so far has been the "if you like it, keep it" statement, which whether we call it a lie or not, at the very least was a mistake.

    With that being said, mistakes shouldn't be used to condemn the plan. I don't think it is the best plan, but I do think it will be better than what was before. Conservatives should focus on constructive action to try and make it better. In that sense, your comparison is apt. They want to go backward instead of forward and it doesn't really make sense.

    1. My Esoteric profile image91
      My Esotericposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Conservatives, by definition, look backwards, not forwards.  I do understand the vast difference between the two, but your initial analysis was what I was looking for.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)