http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/e … 958078.ece
So thats it is it? Obama thinks that a cheque will help prevent global warming? Whilst the EU commits to a 20% reduction in greenhouse gases.
Where are America finding this cash exactly? Does this go onto the countries already massive debts? What are we going to buy with it? A giant gas mask for the ozone layer?
This is a man who was given a Novel peace prize, yet appears unwilling to come to peace with planet earth.
I had a lot of faith in Obama to change things, but all I can see at the moment is a commitment to continuing Americas same old ways......
Britain should be equally ashamed for their role in helping to broker such a deal. Lets just put this into perspective:-
Per capita carbon emissions from consumption of energy
Metric tonnes of C02 (2007)
United States 19.94
How does it feel fellow Brits? How does it feel American citizens?
Pathetic but very predictable result.
I think people should all hold their breath or even stop breathing to save the planet.
And I suppose Americans breathe 10 times more than Brazilians do they marinealways24? Oh, yep, I get it.... I can completely see your logic there
Is it logical to be so emotional in your belief of the planet melting?
Are you aware of the consequences of ozone depletion? I guess that three firsts in environmentally focussed degree modules last year puts me a little ahead of you, or maybe its just because you are old and bitter. That baby in the photo, who is he? Do you care about that babies future?
The point is they want to make money. The cap and trade is a tax on pollution. Yes! Yet another way to tax people.
So you pay a fee for exceeding a the pollution limits (whatever they happen to be) and you get taxes for reducing emission. Either way, the whole thing is bogus. I am frustrated with it, him and the entire world for that matter. No offense world but come on!
I'm reluctant to get involved in this, but seem to be doing so anyway, but don't taxes go into things like *public* services and deficit reduction? Anyway, it's just a passing comment, I'm really not in the frame of mind to analyze any of this, but I'm pretty sure Obama doesn't get to *keep* revenues collected for *himself*...
Now if he were the former head of Halliburton... but I digress (and am not American, anyway, so may elect to keep my freakin' nose out; God knows we have enough idiots in goverment in Canada to keep ourselves busy...)
Supposed to but it doesn't happen... ever.
I don't understand why people think that money can solve everything. How can giving a lot of money ever make it ok to continue having high emissions? It's not like the money exists! It's just a load of 000s on a computer. We can't line up a load of bills and make a new money-layer around the world.
Why isnt this obvious?
Who does the money even go to anyway?
by Jack Lee 18 months ago
The EPA has been regulating emissions for quite some times. It is mandated with protecting our environment like water and air...Lately, it had put much resources and emphasis on climate change. The question becomes is CO2 a pollutant gas and does the EPA have any jurisdiction on its regulation?The...
by Goodpal 5 years ago
What is the root cause of Global Warming -- Greenhouse Gases, Bad Lifestyle or Lack of Money?People blame greenhouse gases - CO2, methane, etc - for global warming and climate change problems. In my opinion, these gases are the symptoms of the problem, the root cause lies in the modern lifestyle...
by Pamda Man 9 years ago
I recently did some research on global warming. I found out that the USA is emitting over 25% of the world's polluting gases. These include sulphur dioxide which causes acid rain, and nitrous oxides which causes health problems. I find this very alarming, as the USA, as a developed country, is...
by Barry Rutherford 6 years ago
After many years in the making the Australian Senate finally passed a Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme. Despite considerable opposition by the Conservative parties and the deniers we now have a scheme which will reduce carbon emissions by putting a price on carbon.
by Ralph Deeds 9 years ago
Economists say that taxing gasoline is the most effective way to reduce fuel consumption by non-commercial motor vehicles which are the second largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. (Coal-fired electric power plants are the only larger source.) The fuel economy of cars in Europe is...
by IDONO 5 years ago
Should the U.S. be putting so much time and money into climate change issues?Whether you believe that climate change is man made or natural, isn't the issue. But billions upon billions of dollars are being spent on regulations and fuels everyday. But what about the rest of the world? If this is...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|