|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Do you see any characteristics of an oligarchy in America?
Some say yes due to a concentration of wealth in the hands of a few. Do you agree with this? Do you see any other characteristics?
I think we're certainly headed in that direction:
The 400 wealthiest individuals on the Forbes 400 list have more wealth than the bottom 150 million Americans---and their wealth is growing, while that of those at the bottom is shrinking.
In 2010, 25 of the 100 largest U.S. companies paid their CEO more than they paid in U.S. taxes. 15 Fortune 500 companies paid no taxes at all in 2014.
There are 22 corporate lobbyists for every member of Congress. 50% of members of Congress become lobbyists when they leave office.
If an oligarchy is the concentration of wealth and power among a small group of people, I think we're well on our way.
I'm also finding a lot of statistics such as yours that I didn't know previously. It's shocking that some hedge fund managers earning billions pay less in taxes than their secretaries or administrative assistants!
I think there was one Presidential race in the past 30 years that did NOT include a Bush or Clinton on either side as a president or VP.
"I have a phone and a pen! " Someone has been heard to say on the airwaves. They believe those are all you need to change the policy of the country. They have been rather successful in doing so
by ptosis11 months ago
federal income tax rates history, During the eight years of the Eisenhower presidency, from 1953 to 1961, the top marginal rate was 91 percent. (It was 92 percent the year he came into office.)What does it mean, though?...
by Sophia Angelique5 years ago
https://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/ … sone_share1. Only 3 percent of the super rich are entrepreneurs. Most entrepreneurs come from the middle classes.2. America is No 4 from the bottom in terms of...
by tksensei8 years ago
BARNEY FRANK: "I'm a supporter as many in the House are, of a surtax on very wealthy people. We should probably be restraining this. But secondly, this is why a surtax on the very wealthy ought to go forward. This...
by Gary Anderson6 years ago
The richest 1 percent have a greater net worth than the bottom 90 percent. If you don't want revolution, this must change. Countries that have this discrepancy are at risk of social unrest. Bottom line, if you want...
by Grace Marguerite Williams3 years ago
crisis, that the influx of immigration should be curbed unless it is determined that the immigrant has either contributable thus relevant educational and technical skills? Furthermore, do YOU...
by Evan G Rogers6 years ago
Billionaires are evil, right? Liberals are always on here reminding us of this.http://www.latimes.com/business/money/l … 9484.storyKABOOM, go the heads.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.