Who is the bigger criminal, Richard Nixon or Hillary Clinton?

1. 58

   retief2000posted 9 years ago

   Who is the bigger criminal, Richard Nixon or Hillary Clinton?
   
   Nixon's allies and cronies used White House authority to block investigations and hide illegal and marginally legal actions. Hillary and her allies and cronies, including the President, have participated in the greatest illegal transfer of classified information in the History of the Republic. Which is the greater crime?

   replyreport
2. 78

   tsadjatkoposted 9 years ago

   
   
   Which is the greater crime? Great question.
   
   Democrat answer: No crimes were committed by Hiliary, Republicans did the same thing. (a total lie but exactly what we expect of the criminal, socialist, democrat party)
   
   Republican answer: Richard Nixon was the bigger criminal because he got caught and didn't have an immoral and corrupt party accepting of cover ups and to protect him from prosecution.
   
   My answer: They were equally corrupt and their crimes were equal. They both committed various crimes however the high crimes they both are equally guilty of is lying to America and covering it up. Once either crossed that line they became equally guilty of anything that resulted from their immorality.
   
   I am certain the two of them would get along fabulously were they to share a deserved jail cell.

   replyreport
   1. 0

      LoliHeyposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      I love the picture!

      replyreport
   2. 78

      tsadjatkoposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Strange bed fellas, huh! At night they allow Bill to come in just to watch the sex.

      replyreport
   3. 58

      retief2000posted 9 years agoin reply to this

      I would rank Hillary's crimes as more severe and therefore deserving of greater punishment. Nixon did use the power of his office in ways that would now be considered de riguere.

      replyreport
   4. 78

      tsadjatkoposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      As far as I'm concerned anyone elected to public office who calculatedly and purposefully lies on camera to the nation is capable of any crime imaginable and has no sense of respect for this country or it's people. That is where the bar lies.

      replyreport
   5. 60

      fpherj48posted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, it is beyond the scope of egregious to LIE to an entire Nation you are obligated to represent, protect & work for.  I'm not fond of nor do I respect NON-Politcians who LIE & deceive either. Lying is the HUGE flaw & breakdown of Humai

      replyreport
3. 83

   tamarawilhiteposted 9 years ago

   Nixon: botched attempt to break into building to steal files
   Clinton:
   1. stonewalled investigation of the attack on an embassy that killed an ambassador after blaming things that were unrelated to it AND likely illegal activities going on there
   2 had a private server set up when becoming secretary of state, in direct contradiction to government procedure, to evade public record requests
   3 had secret and top secret data on said server, a violation of federal law and separate offense
   4 foreign businesses give donations to Clinton Foundation or Bill Clinton paid a million dollars for a one hour speech, State Department within a week or two gives trade permissions, export permissions, etc.
   5 Huma Abedin and several other aids worked for the Clinton Foundation AND State Department and often another federal office, getting multiple paychecks, most likely bribery/fraud
   6 Allegations but not yet proven like the five above that Huma Abedin and other aids had inappropriate access to top secret data and used it in their Clinton Foundation work, in essence, leaking info to curious parties while soliciting bribes

   replyreport
   1. 78

      tsadjatkoposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Sounds like as Chucky Schummer says "Hillary Clinton is one of the most accomplished people ever to run for the Presidency." If you are a leader in the Democrat Party the primary qualification to run for president is a record of criminality

      replyreport
4. 60

   fpherj48posted 9 years ago

   I vaguely remember the chaos and scandal of Nixon. I had an enormous overall aversion to the man. I could barely look at him or listen to him.  Not to mention the fact that at that particular time in my life, I had much more immediate and vital things to do, not the least of which was raising a family.  Politics did not interest me.  Frankly, I wish I'd have remained disinterested.
   
   I have much disdain and disrespect for Politicians the world over.  I see nothing but hard core greed, theft, oppression, deceit, war mongering and power freaks.  Whatever it takes to get there, they are pathological in their quests.
   
   Hillary is so dirty, I'm amazed she hasn't imploded from the heavy load of crimes, lies & money grubbing. It is beyond me how it is every single human being cannot clearly see these blatantly obvious flaws in the woman.. The blindness is stunning.
     John Edwards is a dirt bag as well but at LEAST he bowed out of sight and owns his shame.  These people are truly sick as well as sickening.

   replyreport
   1. 78

      tsadjatkoposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      John Edwards,almost electedVPwith Kerry?Yes,on balance the Democrats really know how to run the criminals(Bill,serial rapist,HiliaryFBI) for office.At least the Republicans,like Nixon,wait 'til they are elected to office to commit crimes. :-o

      replyreport