Why can't a business choose whom they serve as customers?
Does a private business come under the control of the government and the courts because they don't want your business?
Why isn't the Right to Refuse Service to anyone a valid right for a business?
It shouldn't even matter why they refuse to serve someone.
It is like saying that expensive restaurants are discriminating against the poor because their prices are too high.
A car insurance company won't insure your car because it is a high risk theft make, and is that discrimination?
At what point does Freedom get abridged and chilled by the government involving themselves in private businesses?
In my state businesses are covered by a "right to refuse" law. Though I must admit having grown up with parents who owned a small business, I can't see refusing a sale period, every sale is profitable. I would happily except anyone's money in exchange for whatever goods or services I offer. Just seems to me that refusing a sale for any reason makes absolutely no sense, as far as profitability is concerned.
I think they should have the Right and ability to refuse service anywhere without any issues arising with the government or court system.
Though I stand fast on my opinion that its not the best financial decision for a bussiness. Word travel fast these days and one refused sale can lead to the loss of additional customers by word of mouth, or the refusal being shared on social media. It sucks, but it is what it is I suppose.
There is an interesting contradiction between politically protected groups and politically unprotected groups. For example, several civil rights commissions have said Christians can't refuse to make homosexual wedding cakes they find blasphemous per obligations to serve, while homosexual owned bakeries had the right to refuse cakes with messages of traditional marriage because their refusal was deemed political.
Ditto where liberals could deny service to conservatives on banner and T-shirt printing jobs, where their refusal was seen as political free speech, but conservatives were denied the right to refuse.
So these rules are enforced with an immoral double standard - PC groups don't have to do things they don't like, but everyone else does.
I feel like this is a slippery slope kind of situation. If all businesses have the right to refuse services to anyone they please, based on their own beliefs, then we could very easily slip back into a place where black people are suddenly no longer allowed in many public places, where gay people aren't allowed in certain stores, where trans individuals out in public could face even MORE ridicule and harm.
So what. What about ladies night where women get in free?
The Jews don't seem to have a problem, and they were killed for their religion.
A private business is just that, it seems like involuntary servitude for the government to force a business to
by Credence2 3 months ago
Just after I was finished bashing the Right over the gay cake-bake thing in Colorado, along comes Sarah.As I say, you are in business to serve customers, discrimination based on race, color, creed, religious preference and sexual orientation is not authorized. That even protects those who have...
by Claire Evans 3 years ago
Ashers Baking Company in Ireland was found guilty of discrimination for refusing to make a cake for a local gay activist. It was to mark the election of the first openly gay mayor in Northern Ireland, Andrew Muir. They explained it was in conflict with their religious beliefs. I...
by Scott S Bateman 2 years ago
The Mississippi Religious Freedom Restoration Act protects religious people from legal repercussions if they verbally condemn the lifestyle or actions of LGBT persons. Additionally, the bill expands the definition of an individual to include businesses, and so if a business owner thinks their...
by LoliHey 2 years ago
Is a $135,000 fine necessary for refusing to bake a cake?What is your opinion on the verdict concerning the Oregon bakery that refused to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple? They were ordered to pay a hefty fine for their refusal. Necessary? Preposterous? Thoughts?
by Evan G Rogers 7 years ago
Hey all,I came across this article today. http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block169.htmlI highly recommend reading the whole thing, but I'll summarize a few key points for those uninterested in the "hurdle" that is "reading".1) Block (the author) discusses how angry the US got...
by junko 4 years ago
I remember when I was growing up in a community where there were small community supermarkets and appliance stores all around the town. There were Drug stores and hardware stores, bakeries, and fish markets in walking distance all over town. Walmart drove almost all of those small business...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|