|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Is the electoral system out-of-date? Should we elect our U.S. presidents on popular vote?
There have been four occasions in U.S. history where a would-be president lost the election, even though he had MORE popular votes. It happened in 1824, in 1876, again in 1888, and a fourth time in 2000 when Al Gore had 540,000 more popular votes than George W. Bush. Bush had 271 electoral votes, and Gore had 266.
Is it time for a change?
Past time to get rid of this antiquated system. What a different world we might live in today if we'd rid ourselves of the electoral college 20 years ago. Check out the National Popular Vote movement.
My opinion is we need to continue popular vote. However in an ideal world testing would be required prior to voting. I think far too many people vote who have no understanding of politics.
There are enough free resources no one should be uninformed, yet it seems the masses usually are.
The Electoral College defeats the purpose of a Democratic Republic in one person one vote. The elector college changes the math to ignore that one person one vote.
Isn't it bad enough that when one party wins the presidency, then the voters of the other party will not be represented for the next four years by the president. Why, because the president is going to be loyal to the party, and not the voters. Especially not those people that voted against the president.
The parties have and continue to divide the country even more so than slavery did it causing the Civil War. No matter the outcome of the 2016 election, the results will conform to those of the part presidential elections. That means that there will be no progress or prosperity for the country, as evidenced by US history.
It is time to cast aside voter loyalty to the party, and focus on how to be loyal to the country. Yes, that does mean that party loyalty is being disloyal to the country.
We have the current system so that cities and states that have a bare majority don't overwhelm the interests of the rural and suburban areas.
by Faith Reaper18 months ago
I may be a bit naive on this topic, but I believe that my vote should count. I understand the history and all, but I still think one's vote should count, and the candidate who receives the most votes should...
by ptosis5 years ago
"A constitutional amendment, which requires a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress (or a Convention under Article V of the Constitution) and ratification in three-fourths of all fifty states, would be...
by Grace Marguerite Williams12 months ago
Why won't some Americans realize that Trump is LOSING & Clinton is WINNING which is evidentby Republicans endorsing Clinton by leaps & bounds- one of the Bush daughters, Barbara is endorsing Clinton...
by Dan Harmon18 months ago
It seems that at least two electors from Texas have decided to cast their electoral college vote not for the man they promised to, but someone else.Christopher Suprun is one of those faithless electors:"That was...
by Mike Russo19 months ago
People are protesting President Elect Trump? Because Hillary won the popular vote by .3% Trump = 47.4%, Hillary = 47.7%, but she lost the electoral college. That means more people voted for Hillary's platform than for...
by Old Poolman23 months ago
The more I hear about this upcoming election the more confused I get.One of the so called "Delegates" even loudly proclaimed it was they who choose the next winner, not the voters.What if all Primaries were...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.