Why is the FBI information on Clinton email released to Congress redacted?
It begs the question why if there were no classified information on the server as Mrs. Clinton claimed, the interview and related information released to Congress today is heavily redacted.
Does this make any sense to anyone? FBI Director Comey have some explaining to do.
I haven't seen the report but it appears that even the FBI fears the Clinton mafia machine. It seems there is no government agency left that we can truly trust.
I don't think Comey said there was no classified information on the server, just that Clinton had no intent to endanger national security, she was sloppy. I guess if she is President and she detonates a nuclear weapon they'll say she was just sloppy and didn't intend to do it. No kidding that is what you can expect from a Clinton Presidency if the past is any predictor of the future.
What I don't get is why Comey didn't reccomend to indict her for destroying Government emails. It is very clear that the emails she deleted, 33,000, not just a few, were government property and it was illegal for her to destroy them, only the government had the right to determine what was personal and what not, that's the law.
We've been living under a banana republic government since BO took office, it's only a matter of time before we become a banana republic if we don't get rid of these tyrants and stop their policies..
Good points. Comey has a lot of explaining to do... It is highly suspicious that over the past few months, we've been indoctrinated into thinking he is a straight shooter...and then it happened.
Look at Petraeas on Hillary,we thought he was a straight shooter, even Ken Star is now supporting Bill Clinton?http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/kenneth-starr-praises-bill-clinton-223508 Reversal is eividence of blackmail,nothing else.
I always though Ken Starr screwed up the impeachment of Clinton focusing on the Monica affair. There were many other miss deeds by the Clinton that warranted impeachment.
So you think Star was compromised even then somehow? He sure was vilified and demonized by the left and their media shills.
I'm not a conspiracy type. I just thought he mis handled the impeachment process by focusing on the one aspect and letting other more serious charges skate...
I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories either,but getting dirt on anyone for the purpose of manipulating them to do your bidding or to threaten them if they don't isn't conspiracy,for the Clintons, BO&the left it's just business as usual
There was classified and secret information on her server, including the names of various informants and discussions on trade deals.
When the information was released to Congress, the names of spies and informants and other top secret information was blacked out in an effort to protect it from release. Congress needed to know that there were top secret and classified emails but not full content.
What about the emails relating to the Benghazi affair? wasn't that the whole purpose of the investigation that brought all of this about? I want to know what was in her emails that surrounds the Benghazi incident. Is that too much to ask?
But that is proof Hillary lied to Chris Wallace when SHE said Comey said she was truthful about this. Everybody knows she lied to America about classified material on her server, redaction is just more proof, she lied and Comey sighed.
That is an interesting question.
It begs the question of what is the minimum security level of rep and senators in congress. Hillary Clinton when she became sec of state didn't get any vetting for the high level of security information for her job.
It would seem that a congressional committee would by definition be able to see any information without redaction.
And as you say, how is the email given to the congress? If it is not marked classified, then there should be no redaction at all. For classified documents, the classification needs to justify the area that has been redacted. How can a congressional committee investigate with dark lines across the material they are reviewing.
If congress can't be trusted with knowing this information, who can? This isn't even current information, and we shouldn't have to wait 30 years for it to be opened.
by Sychophantastic 20 months ago
If this private email server is such a big deal, worthy of prosecution and jail time, then shouldn't the FBI pursue charges against George W. Bush and Dick Cheney?http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/geor … 97373.htmlWhy was there no outrage about private emails servers when this happened?Are...
by Ralph Schwartz 20 months ago
The FBI just re-opened the Hillary Clinton e-mail scandal - will it tip the election against her?In a letter to Congress, FBI Director James Comey revealed that the bureau has learned of more e-mails connected to the investigation being discovered. The rumors are that e-mails from the illegal...
by Ralph Schwartz 13 months ago
James Comey just admitted he was a "leaker" to the media - should he be arrested?James Comey has been testifying today and in the course of his testimony has exonerated President Trump, made it clear that the President was never under investigation, and in a surprising revelation admitted...
by Scott S Bateman 14 months ago
It was allegedly because of the Clinton email investigation, which Trump had previously let go. We'll see if it ends the FBI investigation into Flynn and other Trump campaign connections with Russia.http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/09/politics/ … index.htmlFrom CNN:CNN's Senior Legal Analyst...
by My Esoteric 20 months ago
Even though FBI Director Comey released a 3 paragraph note, full of innuendo that may make Republican's mouth water, to Congress that they were going to review the emails Possibly contained Anthony and Huma's Shared laptop to see if they Might be related to the Clinton email server case.The FBI...
by Demas W Jasper 21 months ago
Is Mrs. Clinton entitled to expect a presidential pardon for her mishandling/labeling of classified?It seems clear now that Mrs. Clinton didn't take seriously the briefing she was given prior to serving as our Secretary of State on the proper handling of sensitive information affecting the security...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|