How is the upper class not being taxed when the top 1% of taxpayers pay almost 1/2 of income taxes?
Data from https://www.google.com/amp/www.cnbc.com … taxes.html
The richest 1% of Americans own 35.6 percent of all private wealth. The next 19% owned 50.5%. That means the top 20% of Americans own 85% of the country's wealth, and the bottom 80% of the population owns 15%.
A person making $10,000/year is taxed at 15%. That means they pay $1,500, reducing their income to $8,500. This puts undo hardship on someone who is already under the poverty line.
A person making $500,000/year is taxed at 39.6%. They pay $198,000, reducing their income to a paltry $302,000. How is this a hardship? Is it a struggle to live on $302,000/year?
The wealthiest Americans also have their Social Security taxes capped. They don't pay them for anything over $120,000.
Proportionally, there's a wide difference between what the rich pay, and what the poor pay---but realistically, the rich can better afford to pay more than those who are barely making enough to get by. If the top 20% have 85% of the wealth, they should be paying 85% of the taxes.
I agree with your points, but why are the wealthy taxed more whenever they are the successful ones? How can success be condemned?
With success comes responsibility. America cannot be "I've got mine, now to hell with the rest of you". If you build wealth, you should also bear a greater responsibility for building the country that allows you to earn that wealth.
by Kathryn L Hill4 years ago
by Nick Lucas6 years ago
I don’t understand this concept that Obama and many liberals keep clinging to…..So allow me to make it simple. If everyone is taxed at say 10% people who make more do pay more as 10% of a greater amount is...
by GA Anderson5 years ago
Political pundits are saying the Obama admin is floating the typical "trial balloons", (ie. rumors to pundits to get it in the public conversation/news), of a wealth tax - to see if it would have a...
by Grace Marguerite Williams2 years ago
Why middle, upper middle, and upper class children will be more successful in life than children whocome from lower middle to lower socioeconomic backgrounds? It has been substantiated repeatedly that...
by Grace Marguerite Williams3 years ago
middle, upper middle, and upper class parents wouldn't think of doing to their children in terms of their children's socioeconomic success, education, and future achievement?
by GA Anderson2 years ago
You work hard to build a fortune that you can pass on to your kids, or otherwise distribute however you desire on your passing. It is your money. Shouldn't you be able to do whatever you want with it, within our legal...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.