… having lots of money but never being satisfied. Like the Illuminati. Although, I think their greed is for power. Actually, I think those who become wealthy, at some point, had tuned into the law of abundance. Those who become greedy, focus on themselves and care nothing for the happiness of others. The Illuminati want to own the entire world. They forget that people are happy in their own countries with their own governments and cultures. They should respect the world as it is and not try to change it to suit only themselves.
Greed at it's core I think amounts to insecurity.
Kathryn, you are right; however, the OP hates socioeconomic wealth & those who are wealthy. OP contends that NO ONE should be wealthy. Ignore OP. Kathryn, you are intelligently analytical regarding your premise. People who are wealthy have positive ideas regarding wealth & that positivity resulted in their wealth. Wealthy people have an ABUNDANCE mindset which germinated into reality. Wealth is a BEAUTIFUL thing.
Kathryn, there is NO SUCH THING as the so-called Illuminati. That is such hyperbole propagated by negative people who are miserable & failures who are envious of the successful. Don't believe the HYPE. It is good to have an intelligent person who can maturely use INDUCTIVE & DEDUCTIVE logic.
I don't see it as that simple, for we all want more than we have. I wanted a new bathtub even though the old one was serviceable though ugly. I wanted new flooring even though it was the same.
Even those that are super rich and will never spend what they have want more (money), but it's a game to them - who has the most wins. Is that really "greed" to want to win a game being played? I don't see it that way even though the end result is massive, unneeded and unused wealth.
Is greed not being happy with what one has, even though it is plenty to live on and be comfortable? Is it a demand to keep up with the Joneses for no more reason than to climb the social ladder? There is certainly more to it than simply wanting more than we have, for that is how the world advances.
You defined greed well and sited the apathy that I suggest epitomizes greed: Then discredited yourself with ramblings about The Illuminati.
There is NO SUCH THING as so-called " greed." It is in the nature of humankind to want & do better for themselves, their families, & for others- as LONG as they are ETHICAL & DON'T EXPLOIT others in the process of their wealth & success.
Of course there is such a thing as greed. Wanting something is not,in and of itself, wrong. It's what you are willing to compromise,in yourself, to get there which determines if it classifies as greed.
What do you value? If it's only money, then you are right. It isn't greed, to you.
That's probably a good description; if the price for what is wanted is too high, it is greedy.
The problem is few lack the ability of introspection....until it may be too late.
You're right - when wants (greed) are allowed to override intelligence and common sense for very long it is too late. Life becomes nothing but a tremendous desire for, and efforts to acquire, more useless wealth. "Gotta have that Ming vase so I can show up Shirley next door - it will only take a few months of overtime away from the kids!".
Who cares about showing up the neighbors! Now, you are talking about approval. The ONLY person you should please is YOURSELF & otherwise, your loved ones. Pleasing a stranger is the FARTHEST thing that any person should EVER think about. That stranger or neighbor couldn't give one s****t about you. That stranger or neighbor could care less if you become broke.
The reason why you can get the Ming vase(if you want it) is YOU & NO ONE else. I really don't believe in OUTWARD displays of wealth. Wealth should be used for some luxuries but the rest should be in $aving$, inve$tment$, financial $aving$ for immediate & extended descendants, & assisting/helping out family members, especially elderly family members. F****k the Ming vase, really now! Also, wealth can be used to help others outside the family- donate to a school, start up a charity, start a scholarship program for disadvantaged children, etc.
Yes, it is good to have wealth; however, wealthy people, who are smart, LIVE AT at or BELOW their means. It is only the nouveau riche who are garish to the point of ostentation in their displays of wealth. Wealthy doesn't mean exorbitant & vulgar materialism. There is such a thing as understated wealth. People who are garish w/their wealth DON'T remain wealthy for long- they descend into the LOWER classes quickly. To key to wealth is to work for it & once it is obtained, saved & used WISELY.
Strange talk for someone that believes the accumulation of wealth should be the #1 priority in life. You will never become rich by giving your earnings to family or friends, by donating significant amounts to schools, charity or making a scholarship program.
It's really not greed but STUPIDITY........Can't afford it, DON'T BUY IT, end of story or WAIT & SAVE until you can.......KEEP IT SIMPLE, be ECONOMIC!
by Scott S Bateman 6 months ago
In my experience, they are more than they are not. Science backs it up. Your thoughts?https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/spe … 503c1fe516
by Billy Hicks 6 years ago
There has been a lot of discussion about class warfare, and the wealthy not paying "their fair share",so my question for you, my esteemed fellow Hubbers is this:Assuming that they are complying with all current laws and regulations, and paying what they are required to pay, by law: do the...
by Sophia Angelique 5 months ago
According to Malcolm Gladwell in his book, Outliers, the answer is no.Gladwell showed repeatedly that whether people who succeeded or not, depended a great deal on how much wealth and education their parents had. For example, children who have the benefit of a private school learn a lot of things...
by IDONO 3 years ago
Do you have to be evil to be rich and successful?It seems like anyone that is successful is automatically scrutinized by media and the public in general as a person with a dark side. I realize it's next to impossible to be successful without stepping on someone along the way, but does that make you...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 7 months ago
What do you think of socioeconomically wealthy people such as Sting, Nigela Lawson, Bill Gates,Warren Buffett, Michael Bloomberg & Jackie Chan who WON'T leave their children inheritances but instead will leave the money to their favorite charities, feeling that if their children want...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 2 years ago
When will people come to the realization that socioeconomic wealth is a good thing. Wealth means a better quality of life for one & one's family. It also grants more opportunities for one's children. It means greater access to superior medical care & nutrition. ...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|