James Comey dodged a bullet...

Jump to Last Post 1-3 of 3 discussions (85 posts)
  1. jackclee lm profile image82
    jackclee lmposted 6 months ago

    He should get down on his knee and thank God.
    He could have been prosecuted for his miss deeds.
    He causes a distraction of our government, 2 years of Russian collusion investigation and 30 million dollars...

    1. jackclee lm profile image82
      jackclee lmposted 6 months agoin reply to this
    2. Randy Godwin profile image92
      Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

      Actually we netted over 10 million in fines and compensation on Muller's investigation. How much did we net on Hillary's, Jack? And how many people were indicted?

    3. Sharlee01 profile image83
      Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

      More to come for Comey... I would think the Horowitz report will hold more crimes Comey committed.  Hopefully, he is indited for his crimes, and not let off the hook.

      1. Randy Godwin profile image92
        Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

        We get it, Shar. Comey is a criminal and Trump isn't.  Why, because Trump sez so....

        1. Sharlee01 profile image83
          Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

          No,  as I said " I would think the Horowitz report will hold more crimes Comey committed. " Emphasis on I would think. Just an opinion due to media leaks.  I mean arent the media leaks what has you thinking Trump committed crimes?

          1. Randy Godwin profile image92
            Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

            Nope, the Mueller report and the false testimony Hicks and Junior  made before Congress re the Moscow Tower deal. Among many other things..

            1. Sharlee01 profile image83
              Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

              Randy, It is very clear we use a different thought process when defining crime. There are many articles in regard to Hicks testimony to Congres. All use verbiage such as "could have lied", "may have lied"... None make the claim of actual lies. Trump Jr in regards to the Trump Tower deal is covered in the Mueller report.  There is no there there...  I do not buy into if come or have no appreciation of slandering anyone just because the keyboard allows it.  Following facts are the fair thing to do.

              1. Randy Godwin profile image92
                Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

                I don't believe you could follow a fact if you were chained to it, Shar. You'll find out how wrong you are when Hicks and Jr. appear before Congress again. But you're all in with the lies Trump's cohorts tell on a regular basis, and how could they not with the World Champion Liar as their role model?


                Or do you believe they are all telling the truth?

                1. Sharlee01 profile image83
                  Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

                  "But you're all in with the lies Trump's cohorts tell on a regular basis, and how could they not with the World Champion Liar as their role model"?   I guess one could say I believe facts not what anybody tells me, especially when they use words like perhaps, could have or may have...  Facts are not followed by doubtful words Randy.

                  My comment was polite, factual, and I am not willing to get in the mud with you.   It's not me that spread untruth. I should reorient you to the fact Hicks and Trump Jr have already answered congresses questions weeks ago and neither has been recalled...  not sure why you feel "Shar. You'll find out how wrong you are when Hicks and Jr. appear before Congress again.". Just not factual.

                  1. Randy Godwin profile image92
                    Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

                    I believe both will be subpoenaed to reappear before Congress because of the inconsistencies of their testimony between Congress and Mueller. Hicks was a lot more forthcoming when interviewed by Mueller but refused to answer many questions from Congress first time.


                    Jr. also refused to answer many questions from Congress, especially about the Moscow Tower Project among other issues.

  2. Live to Learn profile image81
    Live to Learnposted 6 months ago

    They all dodge bullets. All of them. Pretty much every day. There is no accountability in Washington.

    1. Randy Godwin profile image92
      Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

      We'll see. Trump is still in the target area.

      1. Live to Learn profile image81
        Live to Learnposted 6 months agoin reply to this

        Comments such as this one are why I see little hope. They break laws, there is no accountability, because of people who make comments like yours.

        It's all ok, as long as you are with your party. If you are not, then shame.

        Whatever happened to our collective sense of fair play? Whatever happened to our belief of all equal under the law?

        This partisan bs that has infiltrated society even to its lowest levels is troubling.

        I've always said if Trump is proven to have committed a crime he should be held accountable. I'd like to see equal treatment for all politicians and people we pay to do a government job.

        1. Randy Godwin profile image92
          Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

          Instead you make excuses for the cretin in the Oval Office. No matter what he does, your side ignores it as something quite acceptable.

          Until the Right comes to their senses, you can expect nothing but partisanship from both sides.

          1. Live to Learn profile image81
            Live to Learnposted 6 months agoin reply to this

            Yeh. Ok. Bias partisan bs. You're all in.

            Gotcha.

            1. Randy Godwin profile image92
              Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

              And you're completely immune from partisan BS, I suppose?  lol

              1. Live to Learn profile image81
                Live to Learnposted 6 months agoin reply to this

                You can't see it because you are so blatantly partisan.

                1. Randy Godwin profile image92
                  Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

                  Right. You are the arbiter of all things political...

                  1. Live to Learn profile image81
                    Live to Learnposted 6 months agoin reply to this

                    Never said that.  You spend more time putting words into my mouth than you do listening to me words.

                    I'd say we should just agree to disagree but you seem bent on disagreeing with everything so I doubt we could even do that.

    2. jackclee lm profile image82
      jackclee lmposted 6 months agoin reply to this

      Perhaps not. The IG report will be out in Sept.  I suspect more people in the DOJ and the FBI will be exposed as committing crimes. Whether they will be indicted is up the attorney general Barr.
      Comey is not out of the woods.

    3. tsadjatko profile image58
      tsadjatkoposted 6 months agoin reply to this
      1. promisem profile image97
        promisemposted 6 months agoin reply to this

        Thanks for propaganda from an anonymous website called Forbidden Knowledge, most likely owned by Russians.

        1. Randy Godwin profile image92
          Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

          It's what we've grown to expect from it...

          1. promisem profile image97
            promisemposted 6 months agoin reply to this

            It doesn't seem to matter if a website is anonymous or owned by Russians as long as it tells them what they want to hear.

            1. tsadjatko profile image58
              tsadjatkoposted 6 months agoin reply to this

              Owned by Russians? Yeah, that’s why the owner promoted and voted for Hiliary and was a never Trumper until the fake media turned her with all their lies.

              Is that all you have, attack the messenger? Really, that’s your fall back on everything you can’t factually deny.

              1. promisem profile image97
                promisemposted 6 months agoin reply to this

                I "attack" extremists who spew out fake news from anonymous websites.

                It's hypocritical and irresponsible to use anonymous websites to spread pro-Trump propaganda and then attack real media people who don't hide their identities.

                BTW, I'm curious how you know anything about the owner when there is zero information about the owner on the website. Likewise, the owner has a secret domain name registration.

                http://whois.domaintools.com/forbiddenknowledgetv.net

        2. Sharlee01 profile image83
          Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

          Perhaps you would respect this resource, in regards to the ongoing investigation into "investigating the investigators"?

          As of late Judicial watch thas obtained he 302's in regards to Bruse Ohr. The new information.

          https://www.judicialwatch.org/tom-fitto … -fbi-302s.

          1. promisem profile image97
            promisemposted 6 months agoin reply to this

            I respect any non-partisan source. Judicial Watch isn't non partisan.

            1. Sharlee01 profile image83
              Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

              Not sure why you have a problem with Judicial Watch, they lay out the documents, up to you to read them and make your own decision. The Ohr documents are very damming. I do prefer to wait for the Horowitz report, before condemning anyone.

              1. promisem profile image97
                promisemposted 6 months agoin reply to this

                "Judicial Watch is an American conservative activist group that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials."

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch

                1. Sharlee01 profile image83
                  Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

                  So I am to believe you find any organization that is conservative one that should not be respected or believed?  The link I provide gave the 302's on Bruce Ohr and held very interesting information.  So, you feel these records have no value in getting to the bottom of the investigation into the 2016 investigation into the Trump campaign? As I said I will not discuss the investigation. I prefer to see what comes out of the Horowitz report on the matter.

                  1. promisem profile image97
                    promisemposted 6 months agoin reply to this

                    Please read my comments. I said, "I respect any non-partisan source."

                    I don't read anything from a partisan source like Judicial Watch because they have zero credibility.

                    The silly Horowitz report is a good example. Sean Hannity screamed to the world 3 months ago that the "devastating" report is done. Still waiting.

                    https://welovetrump.com/2019/05/17/hann … vastating/

  3. Sharlee01 profile image83
    Sharlee01posted 6 months ago

    Your guess is as good as mine? Barr most likely was keeping the records private due to the other two investigations going on. Horowitz and Durham.  I suggest you read the 34 pages of 302's, and see what you think. I have an opinion on the findings, but I prefer to wait for the Horwitz and Durham reports. These reports should give good legal opinions on the mess. I am not going to speculate, because it well seems anyone working in our Government on both sides of the aisle rarely answers for breaking the law. 

    .https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ex-top-cia-official-perturbed-by-john-durhams-review-of-intelligence-analysts

    1. Randy Godwin profile image92
      Randy Godwinposted 6 months agoin reply to this

      So what did the redactions show? If you cannot read it all then you have to cherry pick to get any sort of opinion from the 302s

      1. promisem profile image97
        promisemposted 6 months agoin reply to this

        Exactly. And that's what JW did.

      2. Sharlee01 profile image83
        Sharlee01posted 6 months agoin reply to this

        One can guess what under a redaction. I would not presume to do so/ There is still plenty of there there. Like I said you would need to read it and see what you think.  One other reason I think it's just smart to wait to see what the two investigations share. Both Horowitz and Durham have the unredacted versions.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)