I know that Trump is not serious about buying Greenland?

Jump to Last Post 1-10 of 10 discussions (73 posts)

80
Credence2posted 5 years ago
I like to think that he would consider the desire of the 55,000 residents there first?

Such retrograde, colonialist sort of thinking....
reply report
1. 0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  You know he's not serious? I'm not so sure.
  reply report
2. 0
  promisemposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  From what I have read from multiple sources, he actually is serious about buying it for the sake of some natural resources.
  reply report
  59
  Randy Godwinposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  He may want to rename it Trumpland.
  reply report
  0
  promisemposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Imagine what he could do with his own country.
  reply report
  59
  Randy Godwinposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I'm ready for him "to do" some other country for a change. Perhaps Putie will give him one of his very own.
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Why stop there, let's look at Antarctica as a 51st state?
  reply report
  0
  promisemposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I would rather he buys Canada. Or we could just invade. That way we connect the continental U.S. with Alaska once and for all.
  
  If Trump declared war on Canada and took it over, he could:
  
  - Cut taxes on rich people and drive the country deeper in debt.
  - Make it pay for the wall with Mexico.
  - Shut down all media except for Fox News.
  - Kill their commie health program.
  
  So many possibilities.
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Ha, I don't think that the Canucks would take kindly to that..........
  reply report
  60
  TessSchlesingerposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Plus he could tell the Eskimos to go back to where they came from.
  reply report
  82
  GA Andersonposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I think that comment was in jest, but, considering many other factors that would be involved, (see my comment to Don - an accessible Arctic Ocean is a game-changer in lots of international considerations), I think it would be most definitely in the U.S. strategic interests to convince Greenland and Denmark that being a U.S. territory would be a fantastic idea.
  
  Of course, I am not talking about an Imperialism-type action. I am thinking more like $24 worth of beads and gew·gaws.
  
  GA
  reply report
3. 81
  Don Wposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  It's funny you should say that, because I've been following the politics of the arctic circle for a while (yes I'm real fun at parties).
  
  Anyway, as you know, climate change is causing the polar ice caps to melt. This will cause bad things to happen. It will also make the arctic ocean accessible, and more importantly the natural resources below it.
  
  The US Geological Survey thinks the Arctic Circle has large deposits of natural resources:
  
  " . . . the United States Geological Survey has assessed the area north of the Arctic Circle and concluded that about 30% of the world’s undiscovered gas and 13% of the world’s undiscovered oil may be found there"
  https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70035000
  
  Here's the thing, every country that borders the arctic circle (US, Canada, Russia, Norway, Greenland) gets the default maritime border of 200 nautical miles off their coast. Even after accounting for that though, the majority of the ocean is up for grabs to anyone who can prove it belongs to them (this is why Canada has an Extended Continental Shelf Program).
  
  In response to this situation, Vladimir Putin has:
  
  Deployed MiG-31 fighters to the region
  Deployed SU-34 frontline bombers to the region
  Established a main military base equipped with air defense missiles
  Established radar stations and airstrips on four arctic islands
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russ … SKBN15E0W0
  
  Literally planted a flag on the seabed below the North Pole
  https://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/03/worl … rctic.html
  
  In response to this situation, Donald Trump has:
  
  Denied climate change is real.
  Suggested buying Greenland (it is unclear whether this suggestion was a joke or not)
  
  To be fair, this has been something that's been known about by previous administrations, so any lack of long term strategy for the region doesn't sit entirely on Trump's shoulders.
  
  But here's the thing that's unique about Trump's situation. He and the GOP have been adamant climate change is a hoax. His base are all sold on that. If it's true, then the polar ice-caps are not melting, no need to secure the country's claims to the arctic ocean. On the other hand if the administration admits there is a need to secure US interests in the arctic ocean because the polar ice-caps are melting, then clearly climate change is not a hoax and needs to be taken serious.
  
  So the incompetent buffoons we laughably call an administration need to try not to upset Trump's base by admitting climate change is real, but at the same time secure US interests in the area.
  
  The result? "Can't we just buy Greenland?"
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Funny you mention it, as I was reading about a 1947 attempt to buy Greenland.
  
  Other articles pointed to new sea lanes for maritime traffic that now are accessible due to global warming and melting ice. Short cuts abound.
  
  I think that the anti-global warming position is just obstinance on the part of conservatives who are more interested in raping the planet for resources now, and worry about the effect and outcomes, later.
  
  Trump, if nothing else, is expedient. I don't think that he has any real principles about anything.
  
  Acquiring that much gas and oil, now that is expedience, all other considerations have been shelved.
  reply report
  60
  TessSchlesingerposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Who would he buy Greenland from? That was my first thought. He didn't say, did he?
  reply report
  88
  wildernessposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Presumably the 56000 people that live there. And then face it's connection to the Kingdom of Denmark as well - it is an autonomous constituent country within the Danish Kingdom just as Scotland is to the UK.
  reply report
  78
  lobobrandonposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  They do deny that climate change is a hoax, the melting of the artic circle in our lifetimes is just the natural process, we have been moving away from the last ice age for hundreds of thousands of years already, it was bound to happen within just the span of a single generation. Don't you see?
  
  He was dead serious about it. I have been following the stuff in the North too and you missed out one point: Coal deposits in Greenland. Interesting about the flag, didn't know about that one.
  reply report
4. 81
  Don Wposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  President Obama is due to visit Denmark in September to give a talk.
  https://www.thelocal.dk/20190813/barack … -september
  
  Some are speculating this is the real reason Trump cancelled his visit.
  https://twitter.com/davidfrum/status/11 … 8636050434
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I guess, as for the Danes, Obama is still president
  reply report
  78
  lobobrandonposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  If they are showing up in higher numbers it's not because they consider him President. They are showing up because his talk will offer some sort of value to them. If Michelle Obama was coming to speak, there would be equally as many or more willing to attend, it's not because they consider her first lady.
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I was being facetious, it is likely that Obama would receive a greater welcome as a civilian than Trump as a Head of State
  reply report
  78
  lobobrandonposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Definitely.
  reply report
5. 82
  peterstreepposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  This news was staggering.
  First Trump wants to buy Greenland. He wants to buy a country!!!
  And because Denmark told president Trump that it is not for sale.
  President Trump cancels his diplomatic visit to Denmark.
  It is clear that the President of the united states is mixing self interests and being a president of the US on a grand scale.
  Joke or no joke. This is a behaviour that can not be excused. Self interest before national diplomatic relationships.
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  The United States has made an offer on Greenland before Trump came along. Strategically, it'd be a good thing. If he was serious (which I don't know), it isn't self interest.
  reply report
  82
  peterstreepposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  more people wanted to buy or obtain Greenland in the past.
  doesn't make it less absurd.
  It shows a president who has megalomaniac tendencies.
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  So, does everyone with an interest in buying real estate have megalomaniac tendencies, or just Trump.
  
  Overreaction and embellishment. Is that a prerequisite for being on the left these days?
  reply report
  78
  lobobrandonposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Since when is buying people along with the land termed as a real estate deal? Or do the people not matter since they are just a few? This is a bad analogy.
  reply report
  82
  peterstreepposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I do not generalize.
  I only read about what the president of the united states wanted. I do not know how other people with interest in real estate are.
  I said Mr Trump shows us megalomanic tendencies by wanting to buy a country.
  I did not say all people who want to buy real estate are megalomaniacs. Or did I?
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  You never explained why an interest in purchasing proves he is a megalomaniac. If it stems from a simple expression of interest in a purchase then it isn't unreasonable to ask you to what extent interest in real estate contributes to your definition.
  reply report
  60
  TessSchlesingerposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  1. Because he oversteps what people without a lust for power do?
  2. Because his previous behaviour has demonstrated that he is going in a particular direction? He likes to bully people?
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I would agree with you if:
  
  1. Denmark could sell an autonomous region.
  
  2. Trump had sent an offer, as just opposed to expressing a random thought.
  
  3. If the left wasn't so bizarrely inclined to freak out at anything and everything Trump related.
  reply report
  82
  peterstreepposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  So If Putin announced that he wanted to buy Alaska you would not find it absurd and megalomanic?
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  If you think Putin wouldn't be interested in Greenland, for its strategic location, you'd be naive.
  reply report
  82
  peterstreepposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Why is it so difficult for you to criticise the president? If I vote for someone I would criticise him/her if he/she did something stupid.
  Or are you simply defending him because the “lefties” (whoever they may be) criticise him?
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I just noticed you said Alaska. Why would I do anything but laugh? I would be fretted with the man if he showed up at the White House with a contract in hand and tied himself to a column until someone signed it.
  
  Have you all lost your sense of humor?
  
  Never mind. I know the answer is yes.
  reply report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Oh, I finally get it. Trump was just joking, right? So all of these comments you made justifying and defending his idea to buy Greenland were also just jokes?
  
  Man, you need to send your resume to Conan.
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I stand by everything I said. We have explored the possibility of purchase before and been rebuffed. I wonder if Truman would have had such leftist outrage when he actually came up with a price for a bid. It has strategic possibilities.
  
  That to the side. Trump didn't even pursue it. He just thought about it and you guys go off on a tizzy. If you can't see the humor in all of the outrage, it's your loss.
  
  I don't see the problem. He had a random thought. He didn't act on it. He just thought about it. And you guys just can't see the foolishness of going on and on about it.
  
  The up side is, you keep me laughing.
  report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  The only person who is in a tizzy is our petulant man-child president.
  
  https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/fumin … mark-visit
  
  You do know this is not normal behavior for a head of state, don't you?
  report
  60
  TessSchlesingerposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  You don't think there is something inappropropriate for the American president to post on twitter, to constantly lie, to offer to buy countries, to not know the basics of etiquette, to be a racist, to point out that some thought him appointed by god, etc.?
  
  Why would you not think that inappropriate?
  report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I didn't say it was appropriate. We are talking Trump. But, since we are talking about Trump the fact you guys go on and on is the silly part.
  
  The down side of Trump is he says what he thinks. He always says what he thinks. No one can make him stop saying what he thinks. Every random thought.
  
  And that's the up side of Trump also. He has no hidden agendas because the guy is incapable of hiding jack. The worst we can see is the worst there is. Those who read stuff into his tweets and come up with negative comments because he might have meant something, or if he says this publicly then he thinks much, much worse privately, etc. are not really that intelligent. Trump is like Roman from 'Easy A'.
  
  Do I like it? On many levels, of course not. But with the political and social climate what it is it is almost a prerequisite for survival in the public eye. With the news media frenzy of ridiculous accusations it is mandatory.
  
  Trump is such that it would be impossible to come up with a deep state conspiracy theory about him. He appears to be an open book. And, that isn't a bad thing in government.
  report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  That's nonsense, you cannot be our chief ambassador and not be judicious in your use of words and be oblivious to their consequences.
  
  Despite what conservatives keep hyping about, I don't see an open book at all. Honesty and being forthright is certainly not part of his character, so he ain't no Harry Truman
  
  Did you see the News Hour piece, Panther linked?
  
  The dnderhead continues to forget that being the President of the Unit d States is more than being the CEO of a financial empire.
  
  And right now he is a "bad thing" in government.
  report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I don't know whether you've noticed this or not but it doesn't matter what he says. Bad is bad, good is bad, benign is bad, happy is bad, sad is bad, angry is bad, hungry is bad, sleepy is bad, etc etc etc etc.
  
  To the left. Everyone else understands that if all you see is bad, the problem isn't Trump.
  report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  What has Trump done to earn that assessment from so many? That was not said about Obama or even George Bush. Living during his administration, I don't even think that they were as hard on Nixon, because at least he had some political smarts.
  
  It did not just come out of the blue, he's earned it.
  report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  LOL. If you say so.
  
  My opinion is that if you can't give credit when due, if you can't separate your emotions from everything else, you didn't earn your outrage. You fabricated and embraced it.
  report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Your opinion has no basis in reality.
  
  Trump gets credit all the time for being a masterful manipilator, a con man of unprecedented proportions, and the most prolific liar of any president, ever.
  
  He is truly one of a kind.
  report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  From MY point of view, he does not deserve much credit. Who are you to say regarding the source of my outrage?
  
  Could it be his policies and the way in which he handles the office. Am I entitled to an opinion? Rightwingers seem to have no problem expressing theirs.
  report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Conversely, it doesn't matter what he says, his supporters defend him. And, further up this thread, you said he always says what he thinks, yet you and others have repeatedly defended what he says, no matter how racist or ugly. Since, according to you, he says what he thinks, he truly is a demented, disgusting, lying racist.
  report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I'll repeat. Using a term like rat infested is not inherently racist. A racist might see a term they use as racist, because they are racist, but to the general population it just means a community has serious rodent problems and probably needs help, that they haven't been getting.
  
  Edit. I lived in an apartment once that got over run by roaches. We moved when the landlord refused to address the issue. We were lucky that we could move. Those who didn't, who continued to live in a roach infested environment, were not somehow considered lesser by my commenting on the fact their homes were roach infested. My commenting on the conditions was not racist.
  report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Lol, that's one comment of many over the course of decades. What a weird response.
  report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  What's the old saying about ask a stupid question?
  report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  report
  60
  TessSchlesingerposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  It helps to know the facts.
  
  https://www.npr.org/2019/08/22/75319236 … in-the-day
  reply report
6. 93
  Tim Truzy info4uposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, there is the fact the Chinese and the Russians are considering building military bases in the Arctic along with exploring for resources. Maybe our President just thought the name "Greenland" in an area surrounded by beautiful white snow seemed somehow right and really didn't mean it. He loves green and a very few other colors.
  reply report
  80
  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Nice to see you, Tim.
  
  It just that he handles things like a bull in a China shop. What would possess him to think that could ignore the desires of the residents of Greenland to strike some sort of real estate deal?
  
  Then to pout like a baby when he received the only answer Denmark could give and, if he had any sense, would have anticipated.
  reply report
82
GA Andersonposted 5 years ago
Damn Don, Hopefully, we will never meet at a party. We might turn it into a wake.

I have also followed some of the 'when the Arctic Ocean is assessable' scenarios. My interest was first piqued a few years ago by stories of the Russian efforts to establish a credible presence in the area.

If I recall correctly it was stories about the radar stations and something to do with sub-bases that first caught my attention.

Anyway, I can only be optimistic that there are more serious efforts to address this coming reality than a Let's buy it. thought.

But, give this a second thought. By my thinking, (and apparently yours too), this Arctic Ocean thing is a future reality that needs serious consideration, (and for strategic reasons as much as financial mineral access ones), not just whimsical musings. So, should we give the President some credit for at least recognizing an issue?

GA
reply report
1. 0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  "Should we give the President some credit for at least recognizing an issue?"
  
  The bar just keeps getting lower and lower.
  reply report
  82
  GA Andersonposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Damn! I never thought of it that way. I was half-joking. But I do see your point. And I do not want to, in any way, contribute to lowering the "bar"
  
  It is already beyond belief.
  
  Maybe I should have included a smiley?
  
  Remember that saying that if you put enough monkeys in front of typewriters, for long enough, sooner or later one of them will end up typing a Pulitzer prize winner?
  
  GA
  reply report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I didn't read it as a joke, but I am relieved to learn it was a least half of one.
  reply report
67
JAKE Earthshineposted 5 years ago
The Donald Bankrupted casinos which were financed with other peoples money, he bankrupted the once great USA which is financed by other peoples money, he's bankrupting our once great farming industry and bankrupting many working Americans with his crazy Trade War Tariff TAXES which only benefits Vladimir Putin: WHY not start bankrupting other countries?
reply report
76
Valeantposted 5 years ago
For when someone claims Trump is good for the stock market...

reply report
80
Credence2posted 5 years ago
So now, the big orange baby has abruptly cancelled the planned meeting with Denmark, offending both it and Greenland, embarrassing me as an American just because he could not get his way?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald … n-n1044651
reply report
1. 0
  PrettyPantherposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  How many more stupid ways will he embarrass us before we boot his pathetic a$$ out in 2020?
  
  Wait, don't answer that. LOL
  reply report
59
Randy Godwinposted 5 years ago
Where can one purchase a big orange baby balloon? I'd love to have one to fly by I-75 where it passes through our farm. What a brat!
reply report
76
Valeantposted 5 years ago
Trump is the most American patriot ever. Marries All-American women several times over. Pays his fair share of taxes. Served with honor in the armed services. Makes all his products here in America. Ensured that all the money from the Trump Foundation went to Americans in need. Makes all his buildings with only American labor and materials. Spent the majority of his life ensuring that all his workers were documented and had the proper work visas or were sponsored. And of course showed much respect to McCain, Mattis, Kerry, and other veterans at all times. #MAGA - McDonald's And Golf Again
reply report
60
Live to Learnposted 5 years ago
I don't think this was serious but if it was for sale it wouldn't be such a bad purchase. I'm sure Russia and China would be more than happy to buy it.
reply report
1. 78
  lobobrandonposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  If it were not serious, he would not use that as the reason for him turning down the invite by the Danish royal family.
  
  If it were up for sale, but it's not. It's like being invited to a friends birthday, you put his or her house on the market without their consent and when they say no they are not selling to you, you use that to decline the invitation.
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Not a good analogy.
  
  I haven't been following this but this wouldn't the first, second or millionth time one party thought of purchasing something another party wasn't thinking about selling.
  
  Nor would it be the first time the U.S. expressed an interest in this particular piece of real estate, and was rebuffed.
  reply report
60
TessSchlesingerposted 5 years ago
wtf??? Please explain to me what you've just said.

1. People in the civilized world do not sell countries. They do not sell people. They do not put people in cages. They put humanity above profit.

2. There is no way in hell that a first world country like Denmark would sell Greenland to the USA - even if it was for sale. Just the human rights disaster, the anti-climbate change, the racism, and Trump for president would horrify the civilized world. It's not all about money.

3. The left freaks out over the abuse of human rights, inhumanity, and unfairness. The right freaks out over not being top dog, over science showing up religion as fake news, and over men not being that attractive to women anymore.
reply report
1. 60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  I don't think the sale of Greenland would be Denmark's call. It was an ignorant conversation from the outset.
  
  I think, as freak outs go, you've just displayed one.
  reply report
  60
  TessSchlesingerposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  Sweetie, I'm an INTJ. I don't freak out. Other people freak out at us.
  
  Of course, it was an ignorant remark of Trump. I don't deny that.
  
  Another Ad hominem. It amazes me that when speaking to a conservative, all they can do is insult the opposition.
  
  Why don't you actually try presenting a reasoned university level argument?
  reply report
  60
  Live to Learnposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  
  If we are all in agreement the thought was a silly one, why are you going on and on? Why do you make blanket statements about people you don't know and then accuse others of being insulting?
  
  Those were rhetorical questions. I already know the answer.
  reply report
  60
  TessSchlesingerposted 5 years agoin reply to this
  WTF?
  
  Well so long as you agree that Donald Trump made an ignorant remark is offering to buy Greenland, I don't have an issue.
  
  I'm going on and on because you have only now admitted that Trump made a stupid remark.
  
  But I'll leave it at that.
  reply report
60
TessSchlesingerposted 5 years ago
+++
reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

I know that Trump is not serious about buying Greenland?

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

I know that Trump is not serious about buying Greenland?

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies