"TEA PARTY activists assemble in Nevada desert town"

1. 60

   fishskinfreak2008posted 13 years ago

   http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_tea_party_rally
   
   Short analysis: This group includes SARAH PALIN and therefore HAS NO CREDIBILITY

   replyreport
   1. 0

      Brenda Durhamposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      She sure drew a huge crowd for someone having "no credibility".
      
      And said a lotta things the Administration didn't wanna hear.

      replyreport
2. 0

   StormRyderposted 13 years ago

   Lets nuke'm!!
   

   replyreport
   1. 61

      Danny R Handposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Your after my heart!

      replyreport
   2. 0

      sneakorocksolidposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      "Not No but Hell No!!!!

      replyreport
3. 69

   Ralph Deedsposted 13 years ago

   This worries me for some reason!
   
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2RyMmX3ipQ
   
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5ttDmFPB40

   replyreport
   1. 67

      SparklingJewelposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      ...if I went looking for that kind of stuff to watch, I would be worried too

      replyreport
      1. 69

         Ralph Deedsposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         How about this?
         
         http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQGBYY6H … er_embedde

         replyreport
         1. 0

            Brenda Durhamposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            What the heck WAS that video?
            
            Anyway, the main thought that hit me while watching "Hitler" rave about how Republicans have no ideas, was
            the fact that sometimes, yeah even in a nation in economic crisis,  the best policy is to WAIT THINGS OUT.
            
            Besides, it's not true that Republicans had no ideas.
            
            I for one am so tired of Obama "experimenting" with our nation.
            (That's what he called it in a tv interview I saw---an experiment).
            
            The Republican Party might have lost some face and some ground,  but at least it normally doesn't advocate "experimenting" with our national security, our national morale, our money, our jobs, our health care system, our education system, our morale and our morality.
            
            Have I said Obama's policies stink?
            Well, I'll say it again.

            replyreport
            1. 61

               Danny R Handposted 13 years agoin reply to this

               REALLY? The Iraq war experimented with our national security, Lack of financial regulation covers morale, money and jobs. Education? No child left behind, hell they ALL got left behind. Morale and morality? Abugrad, the dungeon we have in cuba, Torturing people to obtain information, I thought we were suppose to be better people than that. It's correct to question political motives and actions, but don't dismiss the actions of those who happen to be in your party.

               replyreport
               1. 0

                  Brenda Durhamposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Uh oh.
                  We're in danger of getting into the discussion about how torturing suspected terrorists or terrorists is EVEN comparable to condoning the killing of an unborn child, aren't we?!

                  replyreport
                  1. 61

                     Danny R Handposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                     I will NEVER make the decision to abort MY child. What somebody else decides is between them and God. And if we expect people to honor our troops and NOT TORTURE THEM, then we need to honor our word which we gave when WE SIGNED the Geneva Convention treaties.

                     replyreport
                     1. 67

                        SparklingJewelposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                        not saying I agree, but the Geneva Convention does not apply to terrorist, so I have heard, but don't know why

                        replyreport
                        1. 61

                           Danny R Handposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                           Because terrorists are not a soveigrn nation. But I believe we are dealing with amoral issue here. If the oppisite little league team is cheating, would'nt it be appropriate to beat that team without cheating. It's a moral principle. Were either for it, or were not. Which is it?

                           replyreport
                           1. 0

                              Brenda Durhamposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                              War isn't a little league team..

                              replyreport
                              1. 61

                                 Danny R Handposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                                 Yet the children still learn from our actions, be it little league or war.

                                 replyreport
                                 1. 0

                                    Brenda Durhamposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                                    or daily life.  Or our moral values/nonvalues.
                                    
                                    I don't get your point.
                                    I think you're just against the Republican Party right now.

                                    replyreport
                                    1. 61

                                       Danny R Handposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                                       Damn right I am! But I'm also against any party that continues to spend our money on wars, foreign governments, corporations, or any other entity except the American people. Noone seems to want to address immigration, corporations moving to different countries to avoid taxes, BILLONS going to foreign nations while our people complain about giving handouts to American citizens, BILLONS spent on policing the world, yet noone says a word about our prisons being full of AMERICAN CITIZENS guilty of victimless crimes. Everyone is so willing to give our taxes to foreigners, but to use for America, NOOOOOOO! Can't do that! Thats Socialism, Communism, anti-American. It's bullsh*& is what it is. I can't believe everyone isn't mad at both republicans andd democrates.They both spew crap and do nothing for America except drive us deeper in debt spending OUR money on everything but Americans!

                                       report
                                       1. 0

                                          sneakorocksolidposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                                          Wow! That was an impressive and powerful rant and I agree with you I must be halucinating!

                                          report
         2. 60

            Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Brilliant.  That guy knows his Republicans

            replyreport
4. 0

   Brenda Durhamposted 13 years ago

   hmm...
   Danny, Are you and StormRyder serious?
   One little smiley icon ...kinda doesn't...make up for the idea of nuking conservatives....

   replyreport
   1. 61

      Danny R Handposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      No I am Not serious! I'm serious about never wanting another republican, and a number of democrates to ever hold office again. I hope I say this without offending anyone. I am so tired of getting the same ole crap from both democrates and republicans, and year after year, people keep supporting these parties. How much dryf$#&%^* does it take for people to get tired of thier bullcrap? I mean really, are we stupid?!!!

      replyreport
5. 0

   Brenda Durhamposted 13 years ago

   Not stupid.
   
   ...Americans should be able to go about their daily business and trust that their representatives are doing the job we pay 'em to do.
   
   If we have to do their jobs for them, we might as well BE the ones in Office.
   
   I think all the crap has watered down the Republican Party.
   Not the Party's Platform (unless Michael Steele has managed to somehow change that), but the Party itself.
   
   I'd rather lose Elections and retain the Party values than to win with a watered-down Platform.

   replyreport
   1. 69

      Ralph Deedsposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Works for me! I hope Palin runs with Glenn Beck.

      replyreport
      1. 61

         Doug Hughesposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Who would be on top?

         replyreport
6. 0

   sneakorocksolidposted 13 years ago

   The left has always felt life is one big social experiment. Here they want to be Europe and want anything American to just go away. Every apologetic social experiment has failed to serve the best interests of America. The welfare and quota systems have done nothing but stifle the drive to suceed.

   replyreport
7. 93

   habeeposted 13 years ago

   I thought Palin was too radical and too far right until recently. Now I'm thinking it might take someone like her to temper our uber liberal congress!

   replyreport