""The real transgression occurs when religion wants government to tell citizens how to live uniquely personal parts of their lives. ... the proper role of religion is to appeal to the conscience of the individual, not the coercive power of the state."
Senator Ted Kennedy
In my opinion Ted Kennedy was corrupt but to each his own.
True, religion should not dictate policy for a nation. However, as protected in the sacred writs of this nation, we as citizens have the right to band together, protest and petition the government on behalf of that which we feel strongly about or cherish. Whether as an individual or even a religious organization we have the right to influence and persuade the hearts and minds of our government leaders.
On the flipside, government is to stay clear of religious rights and practices. The Judicial branch has no right under the Constitution to rule on moral issues. Only the states can do that. The Congress has yet to grow a set of nuggets and exercise their power, as part of checks and balances, to halt the Judicial branch from ruling on moral issues. This is why the Fathers put the term "exceptions" in the Constitution when expressing the role of the Judicial branch.
I mised the clause in the Constitution that says the States can rule on issues 'moral' that the Judicial branch cannot?
The courts on a State or Federal level don't rule on 'moral' grounds. They rule on matters of law. 'Moral' is the value you place on an issue and morality has a place in the home and in the church you select. It's not an appropriate criteria for making LAWS.
"How Should Lawmakers Balance Religion and Statecraft?"
IMO they shouldn't, at least ideally. However realistically, politicians all want to be seen as being religion-friendly because that gets votes.
Lawmakers are charged with making sure we maintain freedom of religion but beyond that, they have no related role.
There is now a local dispute brewing b/c a closed church is being moved back onto the property tax roles (since it's no longer eligible for a religious exemption). It'll be interesting to see which side our lawmakers choose.
by ErictheGator7 years ago
What should the role of government be in helping the 8.5 million Americans out of work?
by cooldad6 years ago
Were the founding fathers of this country Christians? I have always been under the impression that our country was founded by people who were escaping religious persecution. Why then, do so many people claim...
by Doug Hughes7 years ago
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; …”First Amendment – in that Constitution thingie.Granted, the prohibition is against *Congress*...
by Jack Lee8 months ago
Let's just cut to the chase. I have initiated a discussion here on hubpages forum regarding the media and conservatives but here is the bottom line.This is an appeal to all liberals and progressives...and...
by John D Wilson18 months ago
With the recent decisions by the Supreme Court, are we losing the fabric that once made up the U.S.?Changing laws to fit decisions, deciding that homosexuals can marry, getting rid of the Ten Commandments...
by Peeples3 years ago
Can someone explain how it is constitutionally acceptable to have Sunday alcohol bans?I live in a state that still has Blue Laws and slowly more and more towns are getting rid of them, but some cities still have bans on...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.