Chriss Dodd is the Chairman Of The Senate Banking Committee. It was legislation he, and Barny Frank passed that contributed to the recent economic meltdown. The very regulations they pushed through to encourage lending they have now outlawed.
Now take a look at these quotes from Dodd:
"This is about as important as it gets, because it deals with every single aspect of our lives," said Sen. Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.), a chief architect of the compromise.
That's from the Wall Street Journal. Notice Dodd is the chief architect! Now look at this quote from Dodd.
“It’s a great moment. I’m proud to have been here,” said a teary-eyed Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.), who as chairman of the Senate Banking Committee led the effort in the Senate. “No one will know until this is actually in place how it works. But we believe we’ve done something that has been needed for a long time. It took a crisis to bring us to the point where we could actually get this job done.”
Sound familiar? Pelosi said something similar how the health care bill.
The fact is, these politicians passing these bills have no idea what they are doing or what the effects will be. They are the cause of our problems not the solution! Notice how they created the crisis and now claim that it took a crisis for them to pass a bill to fix it yet they admittedly don't even know how it will work!
Anyone that votes for a democrat ever again has got to be insane!
You will always find a politician that says something contradictory to something they said in the past. You could take this in a few lights, for one he may be trying to change his own views for the better. Or maybe he's a flip-flop who shouldn't be allowed to be able to have a voice in anything as big as financial reform or healthcare reform.
While I certainly agree in principal that voting for a politician that doesn't know how a bill works is a bad idea, can you safely say the majority of people also know more than a few things about the people they vote for? It's really frightening when you start to think about it.
On that note, I remember reading a quote about banking from a Hub some days ago. It went along the lines of "There would be riots if in the streets if people knew how banks worked." I'm glad to see politicians aren't rioting.
Is there something about the finance reform bill that you disagree with? Or is yours just a knee jerk reaction against a bill supported by the Democrats. It would be helpful if you actually told us why you disagree with the bill or what it is about it that you disagree with. Do you agree there is a need for some more up-to-date rules for the Wall Street Banksters?
Here's an article which details some of the provisions of the law that will benefit consumers--
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/your- … ey.html?hp
Did you read my post? The chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, the expert, doesn't know how the bill will work! How can anyone be for this let alone pass it, without knowing the ramifications of what they're doing? This seems to be a pattern lately with the dems!
He was just being honest enough to say that he doesn't know how the banks will respond--in the spirit of the law or by looking for ways to get around it. And the Dems didn't get everything they wanted. Compromises were required in order to get enough votes to pass the bill which is a step forward but not perfect. Also, the way it works will depend on the implementing regulations and whether there is an administration in the White House that supports the needs to regulate the markets to assure they deliver the benefits they promise.
Yes, they're doing something. What little something they can with the stranglehold money has in America.
At least they're doing it!
And you have to kiss repubs bums to even get a smile, let alone pass any decent legislation.
But it is important! Because it is changing the attitude towards banks.
They have been ripping us off for CENTURIES!
Whoever was involved in the past...at least they are doing it now.
Nothing has been reformed. It's all posturing. The real core problem is still not being addressed.
These are Political Reforms to appease a pissed off public.
The banks are already shifting the "cost burden" to the consumer in other ways. They are eliminating free checking and raising other fees.
This Reform supposedly limits loans to only those who can pay. That makes sense right? Maybe they should only loan to people who can pay?
So yesterday there is a big article on how Government Motors isn't selling enough cars because they can't reach the subprime market. And they want the Government to step in and increase funding for these subprime people so they can buy cars they can not afford.
Until the very system that creates the debt is addressed there will be no "Fix".
I read another article today that said the debt to income ratio of Americans is 120% and in 1985 it was 70%.
So now we have Americans that owe more than they can make, and a buch of pretend reform that only shifts the burden to the consumner from one area to another.
And Dodd is a useless criminal.
Your points about passing laws then figuring out what they mean and what they involve later is very valid. This is the new Democratic Party way of doing business... (perhaps not completely new?) but being used more and more.
Make a law and do anything to get it passed, then "fix" it later. "Fix" meaning change it to whatever the hell they want.
I've read a dozen articles on what's supposedly in this Reform... and it's all bunk. It won't change a thing. It has no real teeth. And it will not prevent a further collapse.
The crash is still coming.
Can anyone point out to me how increasing the National Debt, Increasing the Military Budget, Increasing Social Programs, and not having any way to fund any of it other that borrowing and printing more money is "Fixing" the economy?
by Susie Lehto 24 months ago
The New York Times is one of the mainstream news outlets that has gone further left-wing than the others with out-right lies, so I am wondering how they will cover this story. They cannot keep covering up for the Clinton Crime Family and save face. This is a good report by the NYP. ...
by Jack Lee 12 months ago
It seems another side effect of the latest sexual harrassment revelations, is that some democratic women, including Senator Gillibrand of NY is having a conscience after 20 years...Now they are claiming that Bill Clinton should have resigned after the Monica Leuwinski affair came to light...Just...
by Holle Abee 8 years ago
I thought this article was interesting, especially since it appeared in the NYT. According to this guru, costs will INCREASE, not decrease. This is the same guru that democrats hailed as wonderful when he challenged Bush. Don't worry, though, costs will increase by only a few billion, and what's a...
by Nicole 5 years ago
Shouldn't the implementation of the immigration reform bill be slower?The debate of the immigration reform bill 2013 is rather fast. We all know the good side; however, it is very important to understand the bad side of the bill. The Media is reporting half the truth. The American public deserves...
by Don Bobbitt 5 years ago
Are our politicians really this Stupid? Or are we that Complacent as voters?It isOct.15,2013. Is this day going to go down as another "Day of Infamy" in our History,or will we and the rest of the world just laugh the budget impasse as another example of our beloved politicians just being...
by Sab Oh 8 years ago
...for Obama to shut up, I'd imagine. He was on the tube today demanding reconciliation and essentially pushing a health reform bill that the public doesn't want down that public's throat. I imagine a lot of dems are looking to November and wishing he'd just shut up already.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|