Is it because they take wealth away from the person who earned or created said wealth?
Taxes are bad because it takes capital out of the economy. Without capital investment, there can be no economic growth. In Western democracies, legislators and other politicians love taxes because it allows them to redistribute capital in such a way that it gives them votes during an election. This is otherwise known as corruption.
Taxes are bad because they are taken by force. It is impossible for them to generate wealth.
Let's think about this in a slightly different way.
Let's say you had the option between having $30, or a basketball, an ice cream cone, a cup of coffee, and a box of spaghetti (let's assume that the items all cost a total of $30... which would you rather have: the items? or the money?
I'm pretty sure that everyone would choose the money. Why? Because you can USE that money to buy ANYTHING, even the items listed above.
Now... how does this relate to taxes? What would you rather have? 50% of the money you earned? or the things that the government chose to spend your money on? Would you rather have $15k? or a chunk of a road built somewhere?
That's point one.
Point two is that the money is taken aggressively from you. Any system where someone gets to take your money away from you at the point of a gun and the threat of jail is NOT a freedom loving system.
Let's think of it this way. Do you think the US should be at war in Iraq? If you answer "yes", then go ahead and pay the taxes - fine, whatever!
But! If you answer "no", then why do you have to pay the taxes? Don't you have the right to free speech and to NOT pay for war and death? Don't you have the right to say "no, i'm not going to pay for these things"? If you say "of course you have the right... it's just that you'll go to jail at the point of a gun for USING that right!"... then... you're insane.
and the third argument would be that they can NOT generate wealth to the optimum efficiency of a free-market.
Let's think about it this way - you want to drive on a road. What's the best way to do it?
1- someone decides that they could make money by building a road between X and Y, and so they take money out of a bank, build the road, and then charge people money to use it?
2- the money to build a road that may or may not be economically feasible* is taken by force by police (the police need paychecks!) from the population, then it's sent to a big coffer of tax payer money. Then some guy who has to be elected in a big huge election that costs millions gets to decide how to spend the money. He is not risking his own money to build it, and he likely knows a few friends who want a bit of the dough. They then ask companies to "bid" on the best price to build the road - but these companies already know how much the people can spend, and so inflate their numbers artificially...
... anyway, you get the point.
*(we'll never know: how can you know if it's impossible to make a profit from the trip? maybe it's better to just use different roads already in existence!)
Taxes are just an inefficient, bone-headed, aggressive, tyrannical way of doing things!! That's why they're evil!
by IDONO 2 years ago
Do you have to be evil to be rich and successful?It seems like anyone that is successful is automatically scrutinized by media and the public in general as a person with a dark side. I realize it's next to impossible to be successful without stepping on someone along the way, but does that make you...
by tksensei 8 years ago
BARNEY FRANK: "I'm a supporter as many in the House are, of a surtax on very wealthy people. We should probably be restraining this. But secondly, this is why a surtax on the very wealthy ought to go forward. This is a way in which we can make up for some of the problems of having to pay for...
by ptosis 13 months ago
federal income tax rates history, During the eight years of the Eisenhower presidency, from 1953 to 1961, the top marginal rate was 91 percent. (It was 92 percent the year he came into office.)What does it mean, though? For the duration of Eisenhower’s presidency, that rate affected individuals...
by Evan G Rogers 6 years ago
Billionaires are evil, right? Liberals are always on here reminding us of this.http://www.latimes.com/business/money/l … 9484.storyKABOOM, go the heads.
by Sooner28 5 years ago
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/1 … lp00000009Um...
by Sooner28 5 years ago
"Income can, under the present system, be quite apart frompersonal effort or service. The owner of capital can earn withoutworking. The essential human function of exchange of effort forincome can become the abstracted manipulation of money formore money. This is most obvious in the case of...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|