http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacar … ee-speech/
It seems that the administration is now threatening economic retaliation against those who don't parrot the administration on Obamacare.
Not a single one of you who believes in the 2nd Amendment should any longer believe in Obama. He's had many other threatening moves made in the past, but this time, it's broadly clear that disagreeing publicly, means the government can harm you.
I think you mean the First Amendment?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
Corporate America can take away your free speech in a heartbeat. They just sue you and get a restraining order.
However, I do not agree with you as to our government trying to take away our free speech.
Read the link. It's in black and white, factual and clear.
BTW, "corporate America" cannot take your freedom of speech away.
indeed, in your example, it would have been the government taking away your civil liberties...
... but nice try!
"BTW, "corporate America" cannot take your freedom of speech away."
I suppose if you happen to have lots and lots and lots of money to fight back with in court, you could indeed get the restraining order removed; in other words, you are right.
You pretend that just having lawyers and spending money to file something automatically grants them power over you. Why?
Where's all the cases of corporations winning cases to silence people's political views? Or anything else? They don't exist.
I know, you want to misrepresent the idea that you can slander a company in public and not be called to account for it as free speech, but it isn't, and neither is an entity defending itself in public stifling your rights.
Who said anything about slander? Jeez, learn how to intelligently debate.
I did make one mistake however. I should have said “injunction”, not “restraining order”.
I’ll give you a couple weeks to straighten yourself out and then maybe I’ll check back.
"Who said anything about slander? Jeez, learn how to intelligently debate."
He said something about slander.
That is the only way a private company can shut you up.
The only thing a company can do to prevent you from talking is asking the court for a gag order until the case is solved.
And then its the court shutting you up not a private company.
1 point for him 0 for you.
I"m not quibbling about the terminology... But the only case where an entity of any kind, be it human or corporate, can in any way interfere with what you want to say, is when you specifically speak about that entity in public, and in a way that is not true AND it harms them.
Being able to hurt or harm someone is not free speech. It is merely license to harm, and no such thing exists.
If you wished to be honest, and state straightforward what you wished to debate, and that is libel and slander laws as they pertain to non human entities, then debate it. But your assertion about "corporations taking away your freedom of speech" is nonsense and we all know that. Which is why my answer was curt and contemptuous. Don't lie to me. I'm not an "opportunist" who tries to distort things to what they are not. I see no problem with the merits of slander and libel laws, as such, I find little interest in debating them .
Have you some take that merits debate?
Hmmm, stay tuned for a future hub.
Your free speech is not being taken away or impinged upon by any measure. The healthcare companies, who provide millions for lobbying Washington on their behalf, were pressured to not flat out lie to the American people with regards to this individual notion. They can do it all they want, but with actions come reactions. What you are arguing about is that corporations be allowed to publicly lie as a marketing campaign to impede upon legislation for their individual gain. Basically, you are a shill for the right wing and nothing more.
by RealityTalk4 years ago
Is freedom of speech compromised in America today?It appears difficult to publish articles pertaining to racism, unless the racist in question is white skinned. It also appears difficult to publish articles...
by Jacqueline Williamson BBA MPA MS3 years ago
Many people see the 1st Amendment today as an avenue to say “whatever they want” without regards of the feelings of others. However, according to the United States Exceptions of Free Speech: “Speeches that involve...
by Amanda Littlejohn3 years ago
Which is more important, freedom of faith or freedom of speech?Many religious folks are decent, good people. Some of my best friends subscribe to institutionalised superstition - and are good humored enough to let me...
by Lions Den Media5 years ago
Obama has used the Espionage Act, passed under Woodrow Wilson to shut down media opposition WWI, 6 times in 3 years, whilst it had been used 3 times since 1917, to target or shut down journalists that Obama targeted. In...
by Kenneth Dantzler2 years ago
People are saying that their amendment right are taken away, especially the freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in America is definitely safeguarded by the First Amendment to the United states of America Constitution...
by Lolita Monroe14 months ago
Doesn't freedom of speech mean that there are no consequences?Lately we hear about people losing their jobs for stuff they tweet and post. People say, "Well, freedom of speech does not mean freedom from...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.