I'm wondering if there is going to be any fall out for Amazon...
i'm definitely less likely to use them as an online shopping center.
Unfortunately almost all of my advertisements on my hubs go to them - I'll have to stop putting up ads on my sites, or add a disclaimer at the end.
Did you hear about the rape alligations against the owner of wiki leaks? Seems awfully suspicious to me
The freedom of my speech is limited by the expanse of my vocabulary and the ability for spell check to figure out what the heck I am trying to say!
Well if Google follow suit and shut them out it would present a massive opportunity for Baidu its Chinese counterpart to host the Wiki site
If you see teh Wiki man tell him that I would be only too pleased to arrange the hosting of his site on a Chinese server - after all that is what happens to sites that criticize China, they get hosted outside and then given funds by some black bag organisation.
How about HP, they might close this forum thread, LOL!!
I can see why Amazon dropped them. But I don't agree with hunting the founder, Assange, like a dog and carrying out a witch hunt against him with phony rape charges. He embarrassed world leaders and showed them for what they are, and now they are carrying out a personal vendetta against him. I don't necessarily agree with what wikileaks is doing, but let's not make the founder the target of misplaced rage.
Assange and Wikileaks deserve all the support anyone can give them, and we (Joe Public) should make it known that freedom of speech is paramount to a civilised society.
If the power elite are embarrassed that their true opinions are being exposed, all the better.
They deserve to be exposed.
The rape charges and the actions of Wikileaks should be dealt with, on their merits, as completely separate, unrelated issues.
And this follows on the heels of Amazon refusing to take down that eBook promoting pedophilia just a few weeks ago, under the "freedom of speech" argument. Interesting.
Amazon is a business. Just like HP is a business. I see people all the time defending HP's right to pull down the most innocuous hubs for the most retarded reasons just to appease the source of revenue. That's how business works. It gets to decide what is in the best interest of its bottom line.
Amazon decided this move was in the best interest of its bottom line. Don't hate Amazon for watching its own ass.
If the government wanted to keep its secrets, it should have done more to keep its secrets. If people on the inside allowed themselves to be corrupted/tempted by that guy at Wikileaks, they should be executed as traitors. They were given trust of the U.S. Government, and paid to do a job, and betrayed both mandates. That is traitorous by definition, and absolutely a hanging offense (which I fully support... F--- that guy and anyone else involved).
The guy at Wikileaks is just doing his job as he sees it... making money by getting information. He's got his information and he's making his money. The only thing I would say to him as a non-U.S. citizen, or to anyone feeling sorry for him, is "play with fire, you might get burned." He wants to set himself up as some kind of liberal super-hero, that's fine. But part of being a hero means risk and sacrifice.
I doub the guy at wkikleaks is doing this for money. That's not how the process works.
Also, he is not buying information. The process to upload to wikileaks is completely anonymous. Nobody can tell where the information comes from. That protects the person who sends the information.
The people who 'sell out' do so because they believe what is being done is ethically wrong and that's why they do it.
The press used to play that role in something called investigative journalism. But investigative journalism is all but dead because the press has been bought out by business interests that manipulate readers to believe what it wants them to believe.
Scotland Yard poised to arrest WikiLeaks boss over rape allegations after Interpol issues warrant
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … z170Vtz3c8
Gues Shades is correct, he has played with the power elite and now they are after him..... but it's a serious blow to free speech if they shut him up.
Let's hope he has a structure in place to carry Wikileaks on once they crucify him.
Interestingly I sent a report to Interpol two weeks ago about a guy who has committed international fraud in four continents, with evidence, and yet heard nothing back from them, I guess Red Alerts need to be started by powerful people!
I think Amazon is afraid that Hilary will make an attempt to have the government prosecute them for the leaks to "national security." And quite frankly, I'd be a bit of a fraidy cat of the government if I was in their shoes.
I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying the government's got a lot more intimidation than I want to handle, let alone some business like Amazon.
wikileaks site is now wikileaks.ch - under a new Swiss address but still hosted in France and in Sweden according to latest news.
The original domain host, EveryDNS.net, says it terminated its services because Wikileaks had been coming under "massive" cyber attacks.
by LoliHey 2 years ago
Doesn't freedom of speech mean that there are no consequences?Lately we hear about people losing their jobs for stuff they tweet and post. People say, "Well, freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences." I beg to differ, though. You're supposed to be able...
by Stacie L 8 years ago
Amazon defends 'Pedophile's Guide'NEW YORK Amazon is selling a self-published book defending pedophiles, sparking discussions about the retailer's obligation to vet items before they are sold in its online stores, and threats of boycott from Amazon customers if the book is not removed.The...
by RocketCityWriter 8 years ago
Do people honestly think that what Wikileaks has done was exercising freedom of speech?Really? These secrets were supplied by someone who swore an oath to protect them - not secrets because it would make the U.S. and others look bad, but because people could die if they were revealed. Sure,...
by irachx 5 months ago
Do we really have freedom of speech?
by Amanda Littlejohn 4 years ago
Which is more important, freedom of faith or freedom of speech?Many religious folks are decent, good people. Some of my best friends subscribe to institutionalised superstition - and are good humored enough to let me say that without taking offense. But most religions per se enshrine some deeply...
by Diana Grant 5 years ago
Should extremists be gagged, or should freedom of speech be allowed?When an English soldier was murdered in the streets of Woolwich, London, on 22nd May 2013, video film on various news stations, including but not limited to the BBC, showed substantial footage of Michael Adeboloja (who grew...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|