The labor department released the jobless numbers and the good news is the rate dropped to 9%! The bad news is only 36,000 jobs were created...
So what's the story? It seems the numbers don't add up! AP reported more than a year ago that it would take 3 million new jobs created to drop the unemployment rate 1% and we have dropped .8% in the last couple of months while only adding about 300,000 jobs for the year! So how can this be? Simple, the unemployment rate doesn't COUNT anyone that hasn't looked for a job in the last 4 weeks! From their website:
So the Obama assault on American prosperity continues! Obama hopes to make that rate appear lower because NO president since FDR has ever been re-elected with an unemployment rate over 8%!
Obama- liar in chief will do anything to hold onto power!
Wow. Getting Americans back to work.
That's pretty desperate, I must say.
Perhaps if you were thoughtful enough to provide a LINK to the story you are referencing we could read all the way through.
Nowhere in what your posted does it say anything about 17%.
It's not a story It's from the Bureau Of Labor Statistics which I quoted in part. It's your government at work! LOL
Excuse me... they are reporting it as 16.1% and showing a declining trend....
Keep in mind 42% of all unemployed have been out of work for more than 27 weeks and those out more than 12 months are NOT counted in the above rate!
I read the Dept. of Labor Statistics report. NOWHERE did I see any reference to ANYTHING at 17%. Please tell us where you got that number.
Here are some sidebar headline excerpts from marketwatch.com
The authors seem to feel that the new jobs creation numbers are directly related to the hellatious (but not related to global warming!) weather and storms that have struck most of the US in the past several weeks.
More Economic Report
Feb. 3, 2011 Payrolls expected to rise at modest pace
Feb. 3, 2011 U.S. productivity rises 2.6% in fourth quarter
Feb. 3, 2011 U.S. jobless claims fall 42,000 to 415,000
Feb. 2, 2011 U.S. private-sector jobs up 187,000: ADP
LaLo, you just cannot tolerate any positive news out of this administration, can you?
Any way you read that chart the trend is that the numbers for January 2011 are better than January 2010.
BTW, that figure of 16.1% you quoted? READ the description.
It incudes people are ARE EMPLOYED PART-TIME! So it's a mixed bag of unemployed + marginally attached + part-time employed.
In other words, a statistic you picked simply because you liked the big number, but that does not really support your point.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force
Please show me where in your OP there are any links.
There are no links. That is why I asked for them.
Let's look at some of the other numbers from the same Department of Labor Statistics report.
I am including both the positive and the negative -- not trying to paint a picture that is not there.
Except for construction and transportation and warehousing, all sectors are showing jobs added.
Boy that really sucks, doesn't it?
Total nonfarm payroll employment changed little in January (+36,000).
Manufacturing and retail trade added jobs over the month, while
employment declined in construction and in transportation and
Since a recent low in February 2010, total payroll
employment has increased by an average of 93,000 per month. (See table
Manufacturing added 49,000 jobs in January.
Over the month, job gains
occurred in durable goods, including motor vehicles and parts
(+20,000), fabricated metal products (+13,000), machinery (+10,000),and computer and electronic products (+5,000).
Employment in nondurable goods manufacturing declined by 13,000 over the month.
Employment in retail trade rose by 28,000 in January, after changing little in December. Retail trade has added 123,000 jobs since itsrecent low point in December 2009. In January, employment in clothing stores increased by 15,000.
Health care employment continued to trend up over the month (+11,000). Over the prior 12 months, health care had added an average of 22,000 jobs per month.
In January, construction employment declined by 32,000. Within
construction, there were job losses among nonresidential specialty trade contractors (-22,000) and in construction of buildings (-10,000). Employment in construction may have been impacted by severe winter weather affecting parts of the country during the survey reference period. (See the Frequently Asked Questions.)
Transportation and warehousing employment fell by 38,000 in January,reflecting a sharp decline among couriers and messengers (-45,000).
Couriers and messengers had an unusually large job gain in December, followed by layoffs of a similar magnitude in January.
Within professional and business services, employment in temporary help services was little changed in January
Temporary help had added an average of 25,000 jobs per month over the prior 12 months.
Surprised that Lady Love hasn't been back to explain why they aren't real jobs:)
I'm beginning to think that Lady Love actually works for the Faux News Network. It would explain her inability to see any truth that hasn't been pre-approved by the right or more correctly, the wrong.
Lady Love has switched forums. Last I checked she was defending the unconstitutionality of the new health care bill and claiming Obama is going to be held in contempt of court (yeah, some piddly federal court in Florida -- ok then!).
Most recently she has been spotted sparring with our European hubber friends telling them they need to be grateful that the US allows them to continue their socialist fairyland existences.
I did invite her specifically to come back and explain the 16.1% unemployment number she cited here.
by MikeNV 10 years ago
"The unemployment rate rose from 9.7 percent in March to 9.9 percent in April, mainly because 805,000 jobseekers — perhaps feeling better about their prospects — resumed their searches for work." - API read this... and it just points out how ridiculous unemployment numbers are as reported...
by Tammy Barnette 8 years ago
http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/lauhsthl.htm Current Unemployment numbers by state, includes historic highs and lows...Interestingly most historic highs came during the Reagan Administration.
by OLYHOOCH 9 years ago
I thought you all said we need jobs. Funny thing. Every month I see a figure like this and I say to my self, this JOB ISSUE, is like, THE OBAMA BC ISSUE. ( Here they are, you just cant see or find them.) We say one thing, they say another. Well, anyway here is there version.The United States...
by Cassie Smith 8 years ago
Who believes that the latest job numbers and the lowered unemployment rate are even real?It is odd that these numbers have improved after Obama bombed at his debate. Jack Welch who is CEO was very bold to speak up about it and he's right. It doesn't seem that we can trust any published...
by Cassie Smith 7 years ago
How will Obama explain away the higher 7.3% unemployment rate?Let's face it. This was another lie or at the very least another broken promise by Obama. How does he think he can lower the unemployment rate while increasing taxes to fund Obamacare? He obviously doesn't see the...
by Mike Russo 4 years ago
Is Trump going to take credit for Obama's job and unemployment Numbers for the month of January?According to Reuters News, Jobs in January. increased by 277,000. Unemployment is down to 4.8 %. Trump said while campaigning, "don't believe those numbers. The real rate is 28% to...
Copyright © 2021 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|