Do you support this action although it may result in U.S. involvement in a third war? Are the humanitarian considerations sufficient to justify this action?
Sometimes you have a choice between bad and worse and the unpleasant task is figuring out which is less ugly. Ghadafi is a terrorist, and he has huge reserves of oil. That's not a good scenario.
The timing is lousy but it is what it is. Europe has shown interest in shouldering the load. If the regime is toppled and an elected government takes control of the wealth to benefit the people and not harbor terrorism, that's a good deal. The question is - can we shape that outcome without a huge investment of ground troops and cash?
Beg to differ my friend. The only two terrorist countries in the middle east not including the Palestinians of course are the two that are not controlled by the big oil companies, namely Iran and Libya. If they go into Libya it is for the oil. Their only consideration is, will it increase the uprisings already going on, such that they could lose control of what they already control like Bahrain. But according to
Pepe Escobar, "The Arab counter-revolution is winning".
by pisean2823117 years ago
In a surprise move, Iran invited all 15 UN Security Council members to dinner Thursday in New York, yielding one of the highest-level US-Iran contacts since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
by Dave McClure6 years ago
Alone among 15 members of the Security Council, the US vetoes the Arab resolution condemning Israeli expansion.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12512732At a time when US involvement in Middle East is under...
by limengnemo8 years ago
I just read an article on the Times.It talked about the relationship between the US and Brazil.The two powerhouses based in the north and south of the New New world.It's really interesting. As we know,Brazil has...
by Rydin6 years ago
There were frequent reports of the membership of the Security Council to accept Palestine as a full member of the UN.
by fishskinfreak20086 years ago
Web-site/URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101218/ap_ … reas_clashIt's HIGHLY UNLIKELY that anything substantive will be achieved at this meeting. IT SEEMS LIKE the North Koreans are only TALKING tough...yet again
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.